Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
investor
ParticipantBS. If you do wire transfers, no reporting to the government/IRS. Still supposed to claim capital gains. I’ve bought off of mike maloney’s web site and I was pleased.
investor
ParticipantBS. If you do wire transfers, no reporting to the government/IRS. Still supposed to claim capital gains. I’ve bought off of mike maloney’s web site and I was pleased.
investor
ParticipantBS. If you do wire transfers, no reporting to the government/IRS. Still supposed to claim capital gains. I’ve bought off of mike maloney’s web site and I was pleased.
investor
ParticipantBS. If you do wire transfers, no reporting to the government/IRS. Still supposed to claim capital gains. I’ve bought off of mike maloney’s web site and I was pleased.
investor
ParticipantGood point. The problem is both parties do similar things when it comes to money. The problem is our system of congressmen/women that set up decades of power along with the intense lobby money thrown at them that over the years, gets the best of almost anyone. Thats why term limits for congress are the only real solution. Also, having congress be volenteer only and meet only for 6 months a year would also reduce mis-behavior. A number of states govern quite well only meeting for 1-2 months a year. The country does not have to be re-invemted every year. Tweaked yes. Re-invented no. Back to work.
investor
ParticipantGood point. The problem is both parties do similar things when it comes to money. The problem is our system of congressmen/women that set up decades of power along with the intense lobby money thrown at them that over the years, gets the best of almost anyone. Thats why term limits for congress are the only real solution. Also, having congress be volenteer only and meet only for 6 months a year would also reduce mis-behavior. A number of states govern quite well only meeting for 1-2 months a year. The country does not have to be re-invemted every year. Tweaked yes. Re-invented no. Back to work.
investor
ParticipantGood point. The problem is both parties do similar things when it comes to money. The problem is our system of congressmen/women that set up decades of power along with the intense lobby money thrown at them that over the years, gets the best of almost anyone. Thats why term limits for congress are the only real solution. Also, having congress be volenteer only and meet only for 6 months a year would also reduce mis-behavior. A number of states govern quite well only meeting for 1-2 months a year. The country does not have to be re-invemted every year. Tweaked yes. Re-invented no. Back to work.
investor
ParticipantGood point. The problem is both parties do similar things when it comes to money. The problem is our system of congressmen/women that set up decades of power along with the intense lobby money thrown at them that over the years, gets the best of almost anyone. Thats why term limits for congress are the only real solution. Also, having congress be volenteer only and meet only for 6 months a year would also reduce mis-behavior. A number of states govern quite well only meeting for 1-2 months a year. The country does not have to be re-invemted every year. Tweaked yes. Re-invented no. Back to work.
investor
ParticipantGood point. The problem is both parties do similar things when it comes to money. The problem is our system of congressmen/women that set up decades of power along with the intense lobby money thrown at them that over the years, gets the best of almost anyone. Thats why term limits for congress are the only real solution. Also, having congress be volenteer only and meet only for 6 months a year would also reduce mis-behavior. A number of states govern quite well only meeting for 1-2 months a year. The country does not have to be re-invemted every year. Tweaked yes. Re-invented no. Back to work.
investor
ParticipantBs. By the way, I do believe that the current administration has reinflated the bubble by throwing 850 billion in TARP at it and backing untold trillions in debt bonds. I do think that the 1.3 trillion in commercial bad debt as well as the millions of homes not servicing their debt but still off the banks books does mean that we are in for a downturn at some point in the next 1-2 years. How bad? depends on how successful the fed is at throwing money at it, risking inflation and an erosion of foreign investors in dollar denominated assets. Hard to know how all of these factors will play out. Most economists really don’t have a clue, IMHO.
investor
ParticipantBs. By the way, I do believe that the current administration has reinflated the bubble by throwing 850 billion in TARP at it and backing untold trillions in debt bonds. I do think that the 1.3 trillion in commercial bad debt as well as the millions of homes not servicing their debt but still off the banks books does mean that we are in for a downturn at some point in the next 1-2 years. How bad? depends on how successful the fed is at throwing money at it, risking inflation and an erosion of foreign investors in dollar denominated assets. Hard to know how all of these factors will play out. Most economists really don’t have a clue, IMHO.
investor
ParticipantBs. By the way, I do believe that the current administration has reinflated the bubble by throwing 850 billion in TARP at it and backing untold trillions in debt bonds. I do think that the 1.3 trillion in commercial bad debt as well as the millions of homes not servicing their debt but still off the banks books does mean that we are in for a downturn at some point in the next 1-2 years. How bad? depends on how successful the fed is at throwing money at it, risking inflation and an erosion of foreign investors in dollar denominated assets. Hard to know how all of these factors will play out. Most economists really don’t have a clue, IMHO.
investor
ParticipantBs. By the way, I do believe that the current administration has reinflated the bubble by throwing 850 billion in TARP at it and backing untold trillions in debt bonds. I do think that the 1.3 trillion in commercial bad debt as well as the millions of homes not servicing their debt but still off the banks books does mean that we are in for a downturn at some point in the next 1-2 years. How bad? depends on how successful the fed is at throwing money at it, risking inflation and an erosion of foreign investors in dollar denominated assets. Hard to know how all of these factors will play out. Most economists really don’t have a clue, IMHO.
investor
ParticipantBs. By the way, I do believe that the current administration has reinflated the bubble by throwing 850 billion in TARP at it and backing untold trillions in debt bonds. I do think that the 1.3 trillion in commercial bad debt as well as the millions of homes not servicing their debt but still off the banks books does mean that we are in for a downturn at some point in the next 1-2 years. How bad? depends on how successful the fed is at throwing money at it, risking inflation and an erosion of foreign investors in dollar denominated assets. Hard to know how all of these factors will play out. Most economists really don’t have a clue, IMHO.
-
AuthorPosts
