Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 11, 2008 at 7:43 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #285968October 11, 2008 at 7:43 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286261
HereWeGo
ParticipantFNM and FRM were as much victims as perpetrators. The great majority of the bad paper out there does not involve FNM or FRM.
October 11, 2008 at 7:43 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286282ParticipantFNM and FRM were as much victims as perpetrators. The great majority of the bad paper out there does not involve FNM or FRM.
October 11, 2008 at 7:43 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286304ParticipantFNM and FRM were as much victims as perpetrators. The great majority of the bad paper out there does not involve FNM or FRM.
October 11, 2008 at 7:43 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286310ParticipantFNM and FRM were as much victims as perpetrators. The great majority of the bad paper out there does not involve FNM or FRM.
ParticipantI can’t say that I can differentiate between the home debtor that refied out all their equity and spent it on toys and the I-bank chief that head every chance to sell assets to stay afloat, but ended up in BK instead. They both deserve to be followed by annoying people in Pink Panther suits, as I see it.
The US can’t really default since we borrow in dollars. We can just print more.
ParticipantI can’t say that I can differentiate between the home debtor that refied out all their equity and spent it on toys and the I-bank chief that head every chance to sell assets to stay afloat, but ended up in BK instead. They both deserve to be followed by annoying people in Pink Panther suits, as I see it.
The US can’t really default since we borrow in dollars. We can just print more.
ParticipantI can’t say that I can differentiate between the home debtor that refied out all their equity and spent it on toys and the I-bank chief that head every chance to sell assets to stay afloat, but ended up in BK instead. They both deserve to be followed by annoying people in Pink Panther suits, as I see it.
The US can’t really default since we borrow in dollars. We can just print more.
ParticipantI can’t say that I can differentiate between the home debtor that refied out all their equity and spent it on toys and the I-bank chief that head every chance to sell assets to stay afloat, but ended up in BK instead. They both deserve to be followed by annoying people in Pink Panther suits, as I see it.
The US can’t really default since we borrow in dollars. We can just print more.
ParticipantI can’t say that I can differentiate between the home debtor that refied out all their equity and spent it on toys and the I-bank chief that head every chance to sell assets to stay afloat, but ended up in BK instead. They both deserve to be followed by annoying people in Pink Panther suits, as I see it.
The US can’t really default since we borrow in dollars. We can just print more.
ParticipantWell, it beats the old school cure of selling the defaulting debtor into slavery.
The US better wake up to the fact that we have a default crisis that’s causing a credit crisis.
ParticipantWell, it beats the old school cure of selling the defaulting debtor into slavery.
The US better wake up to the fact that we have a default crisis that’s causing a credit crisis.
ParticipantWell, it beats the old school cure of selling the defaulting debtor into slavery.
The US better wake up to the fact that we have a default crisis that’s causing a credit crisis.
ParticipantWell, it beats the old school cure of selling the defaulting debtor into slavery.
The US better wake up to the fact that we have a default crisis that’s causing a credit crisis.
ParticipantWell, it beats the old school cure of selling the defaulting debtor into slavery.
The US better wake up to the fact that we have a default crisis that’s causing a credit crisis.
-
AuthorPosts