Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 2, 2021 at 8:23 AM in reply to: June inflation way below expections, MSM clickbait hypers and inflata-doomers lose interest in topic #822736August 2, 2021 at 8:14 AM in reply to: June inflation way below expections, MSM clickbait hypers and inflata-doomers lose interest in topic #822735gzzParticipant
[quote=Coronita]wait, how are you srguing theres no inflation on this thread but on the other thread talking about how rents are going to the moon???
[/quote]
The rent increases are real, not artifacts of high background inflation.
Even with low overall inflation, some prices will go up a lot while others will drop.
gzzParticipantIt’s a literal long term interest rate hedge. It would be an inflation hedge too to the extent they are correlated.
However, there’s tons of ways to hedge inflation, and I don’t think it is a particularly good one.
July 30, 2021 at 5:25 PM in reply to: June inflation way below expections, MSM clickbait hypers and inflata-doomers lose interest in topic #822708gzzParticipantReminder: From 1995 to the present, the money supply in Japan went up more than 400%, but prices went up about 4%. Not per year, 4% total over 26 years.
July 30, 2021 at 5:15 PM in reply to: June inflation way below expections, MSM clickbait hypers and inflata-doomers lose interest in topic #822707gzzParticipantCleveland Fed’s inflation market-based inflation expectation measure: 1.61% per year the next five years, and 2.01% over 30 years.
But that’s booooooring. Nobody will click on that!
https://www.clevelandfed.org/our-research/indicators-and-data/inflation-expectations.aspx
July 30, 2021 at 4:56 PM in reply to: June inflation way below expections, MSM clickbait hypers and inflata-doomers lose interest in topic #822706gzzParticipantWrong. In March 1947 it was 19.7%, and was last above 10% in Dec 1981.
Inflata-doomers, in addition to false claims of “record inflation” like this, also constantly change their measure. When 1-month inflation is high, they annualize. When the monthly goes down, then they go to YoY.
The click-bait peddlers that hook the inflatadoomers so easily love to have little interviews and human interest stories about high inflation outliers, but you never seem them interview some guy buying a 60 inch TV at Wal-Mart for fewer nominal dollars than a 25 inch one ten years ago and saying “Hey this deflation’s awesome!”
July 30, 2021 at 1:14 PM in reply to: June inflation way below expections, MSM clickbait hypers and inflata-doomers lose interest in topic #822699gzzParticipantMore good news from 2 weeks ago: that stupid $1500 “adverse market fee” that raised conventional refi rates by .125-.25 is now GONE.
gzzParticipant2400 to 2800 in two years is 8.3% per year and to $2900 is 10.4% a year.
Not bad!
5k more undergrads must mean a lot more staff and faculty too. The new trolley line however will let them live off campus more easily. It seems to be a rare government project with fast paced construction.
gzzParticipantI had no idea Ryzen 5 had such better built in graphics as Intel chips.
Ultimately it’s not very important. ZK will probably barely notice his new PC is faster than his 4 year old one, and not notice at all the speed difference between these two PCs, unless he is doing some power user stuff like video edits.
I still use my 2011ish Gen 1 i7-890 desktop, and it really is barely any slower for most daily tasks than my shiny new Omen 25L.
The biggest difference for general office use is that the new PC does OCR of large scanned documents a ton faster than older PCs. Not sure how often people need to do giant OCR projects however.
gzzParticipantGigantic UCSD housing shortage sends UTC rents up 17%:
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/education/story/2021-07-18/housing-shortage-uc-san-diego
“La Jolla has been a focal point of the expansion. Since 2015, UCSD has increased its undergraduate enrollment by 5,252 — more than any other UC school. ”
gzzParticipantThat PC looks like a great value with great specs. It is only a 90W power supply which would have been way too low a few years ago but I assume is OK now.
From a clutter standpoint you can add a 2nd 2TB HD to the inside rather than get another external. The internals are usually about $5-10 cheaper too.
The specs on their website say it supports this:
Storage Storage Support Up to 2 drives, 1x 3.5″ HDD + 1x M.2 SSD • 3.5″ HDD up to 2TB • M.2 SSD up to 512GB
gzzParticipantNah my views on everything discussed here are not strongly held, they may come off that way because they’re confidently expressed as a vocational habit.
gzzParticipantFlu suggests something a lot more expensive than me. A 12GB external RAID would be I’d guess something like $500+ on top of the normal computer price. I had something similar for my business for about 8 years called a NAS. The NAS itself failed but not the drives inside, and I ended up parting out the drives to PCs and using a regular PC to host the office network.
The only home PC use of such size would be storing a huge collection of HD quality videos. With smart phones able to take 4k video and maybe ripping your favorite blurays that’s not an exotic requirement like it would have been a few years ago. Still it is atypical.
If you want a desktop for typical home use something like this would be great and probably provide more like 8 years of good use:
https://www.hp.com/us-en/shop/pdp/hp-slim-desktop-s01-af0134z
It has the SSD + HD setup already in it and HP is the most reliable brand in my experience for computer equipment. It also has a DVD drive and burner, which I think is still pretty useful but is becoming harder to find on new PCs.
gzzParticipantWow, did one of your listings end up in the McMansion Hell blog?
I don’t have strong views on styles, I just know what’s ugly and what’s nice, and have a soft spot for Carrara marble. Now this is classy, but became a tear down because it was too small:
gzzParticipantThere are some easy software fixes for a slightly bad hard drive, which you can run by just hooking it up to a new working PC.
If those don’t work, you’re looking at costly data recovery services that will be $2,000+.
In my view the best system for regular PC users is to have an SSD as their windows C drive and use a regular HD for large seldomly used files plus as a windows backup. There are other backup options for even more important stuff, but most failures will not hit both drives at once so this will be a good setup for most people.
I had an SSD completely fail once, and Windows backup completely fixed it with just a few clicks.
-
AuthorPosts