[gandalf]

I hope the GOP regains their senses, serve as a check-and-balance on Dem rule. We need everyone at the table — with all their faculties and for the right reasons. Unfortunately, republicans are just lost at sea right now.

Thread-jack, anybody buying gold these days? Currency concerns?

[gandalf]

I hope the GOP regains their senses, serve as a check-and-balance on Dem rule. We need everyone at the table — with all their faculties and for the right reasons. Unfortunately, republicans are just lost at sea right now.

Thread-jack, anybody buying gold these days? Currency concerns?

[gandalf]

I hope the GOP regains their senses, serve as a check-and-balance on Dem rule. We need everyone at the table — with all their faculties and for the right reasons. Unfortunately, republicans are just lost at sea right now.

Thread-jack, anybody buying gold these days? Currency concerns?

[gandalf]

I hope the GOP regains their senses, serve as a check-and-balance on Dem rule. We need everyone at the table — with all their faculties and for the right reasons. Unfortunately, republicans are just lost at sea right now.

Thread-jack, anybody buying gold these days? Currency concerns?

[gandalf]

I hope the GOP regains their senses, serve as a check-and-balance on Dem rule. We need everyone at the table — with all their faculties and for the right reasons. Unfortunately, republicans are just lost at sea right now.

Thread-jack, anybody buying gold these days? Currency concerns?

[gandalf]

I do agree Stewart and Colbert ‘lean left’, at least after the Bush years. But on this CNBC thing, Stewart is pretty squarely focused on bogus financial news ‘personalities’ and the ridiculous drivel they pass off as ‘news’…

I’ve got a ‘mixed’ take on Obama so far. I don’t like Geithner or Sumners. Response to crisis has been too ‘establishment’, propping up the bezzle. But I think the GOP response has been worse. So it’s basically, same as it ever was.

[gandalf]

I do agree Stewart and Colbert ‘lean left’, at least after the Bush years. But on this CNBC thing, Stewart is pretty squarely focused on bogus financial news ‘personalities’ and the ridiculous drivel they pass off as ‘news’…

I’ve got a ‘mixed’ take on Obama so far. I don’t like Geithner or Sumners. Response to crisis has been too ‘establishment’, propping up the bezzle. But I think the GOP response has been worse. So it’s basically, same as it ever was.

[gandalf]

I do agree Stewart and Colbert ‘lean left’, at least after the Bush years. But on this CNBC thing, Stewart is pretty squarely focused on bogus financial news ‘personalities’ and the ridiculous drivel they pass off as ‘news’…

I’ve got a ‘mixed’ take on Obama so far. I don’t like Geithner or Sumners. Response to crisis has been too ‘establishment’, propping up the bezzle. But I think the GOP response has been worse. So it’s basically, same as it ever was.

[gandalf]

I do agree Stewart and Colbert ‘lean left’, at least after the Bush years. But on this CNBC thing, Stewart is pretty squarely focused on bogus financial news ‘personalities’ and the ridiculous drivel they pass off as ‘news’…

I’ve got a ‘mixed’ take on Obama so far. I don’t like Geithner or Sumners. Response to crisis has been too ‘establishment’, propping up the bezzle. But I think the GOP response has been worse. So it’s basically, same as it ever was.

[gandalf]

I do agree Stewart and Colbert ‘lean left’, at least after the Bush years. But on this CNBC thing, Stewart is pretty squarely focused on bogus financial news ‘personalities’ and the ridiculous drivel they pass off as ‘news’…

I’ve got a ‘mixed’ take on Obama so far. I don’t like Geithner or Sumners. Response to crisis has been too ‘establishment’, propping up the bezzle. But I think the GOP response has been worse. So it’s basically, same as it ever was.

[gandalf]

There’s no need for a ‘partisan pivot’. Last time I checked, the ‘NBC’ gang was supposed to be in the tank for Obama, right? So the NBC vs. Stewart thing being about Obama just doesn’t hold water.

This is pretty squarely about the hypocrisy at CNBC, Mad Money, Fast Money, Squawk Box, etc. and all these bogus “financial news” shows that fueled the bubble rather than reporting it as the fraud that it was.

I’m with ‘Market-Ticker’: all of the bums who participated in the BEZZLE need to exposed or indicted. Stewart shaming Cramer into oblivion is long overdue. Mad Money is going the way of ridiculous ‘Crossfire’…

BTW, notice Bloomberg is not really part of this discussion? How come? My take is, because they stayed *relatively* focused on being a credible source of financial news, not cheerleading reckless frauds and financiers.

[gandalf]

There’s no need for a ‘partisan pivot’. Last time I checked, the ‘NBC’ gang was supposed to be in the tank for Obama, right? So the NBC vs. Stewart thing being about Obama just doesn’t hold water.

This is pretty squarely about the hypocrisy at CNBC, Mad Money, Fast Money, Squawk Box, etc. and all these bogus “financial news” shows that fueled the bubble rather than reporting it as the fraud that it was.

I’m with ‘Market-Ticker’: all of the bums who participated in the BEZZLE need to exposed or indicted. Stewart shaming Cramer into oblivion is long overdue. Mad Money is going the way of ridiculous ‘Crossfire’…

BTW, notice Bloomberg is not really part of this discussion? How come? My take is, because they stayed *relatively* focused on being a credible source of financial news, not cheerleading reckless frauds and financiers.

[gandalf]

There’s no need for a ‘partisan pivot’. Last time I checked, the ‘NBC’ gang was supposed to be in the tank for Obama, right? So the NBC vs. Stewart thing being about Obama just doesn’t hold water.

This is pretty squarely about the hypocrisy at CNBC, Mad Money, Fast Money, Squawk Box, etc. and all these bogus “financial news” shows that fueled the bubble rather than reporting it as the fraud that it was.

I’m with ‘Market-Ticker’: all of the bums who participated in the BEZZLE need to exposed or indicted. Stewart shaming Cramer into oblivion is long overdue. Mad Money is going the way of ridiculous ‘Crossfire’…

BTW, notice Bloomberg is not really part of this discussion? How come? My take is, because they stayed *relatively* focused on being a credible source of financial news, not cheerleading reckless frauds and financiers.

[gandalf]

There’s no need for a ‘partisan pivot’. Last time I checked, the ‘NBC’ gang was supposed to be in the tank for Obama, right? So the NBC vs. Stewart thing being about Obama just doesn’t hold water.

This is pretty squarely about the hypocrisy at CNBC, Mad Money, Fast Money, Squawk Box, etc. and all these bogus “financial news” shows that fueled the bubble rather than reporting it as the fraud that it was.

I’m with ‘Market-Ticker’: all of the bums who participated in the BEZZLE need to exposed or indicted. Stewart shaming Cramer into oblivion is long overdue. Mad Money is going the way of ridiculous ‘Crossfire’…

BTW, notice Bloomberg is not really part of this discussion? How come? My take is, because they stayed *relatively* focused on being a credible source of financial news, not cheerleading reckless frauds and financiers.

[gandalf]

There’s no need for a ‘partisan pivot’. Last time I checked, the ‘NBC’ gang was supposed to be in the tank for Obama, right? So the NBC vs. Stewart thing being about Obama just doesn’t hold water.

This is pretty squarely about the hypocrisy at CNBC, Mad Money, Fast Money, Squawk Box, etc. and all these bogus “financial news” shows that fueled the bubble rather than reporting it as the fraud that it was.

I’m with ‘Market-Ticker’: all of the bums who participated in the BEZZLE need to exposed or indicted. Stewart shaming Cramer into oblivion is long overdue. Mad Money is going the way of ridiculous ‘Crossfire’…

BTW, notice Bloomberg is not really part of this discussion? How come? My take is, because they stayed *relatively* focused on being a credible source of financial news, not cheerleading reckless frauds and financiers.

[Author]

Posts