Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 19, 2008 at 4:31 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #242904July 19, 2008 at 4:31 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #243047
gandalf
ParticipantLooking at the numbers, I’m guessing WAMU has about a year left, assuming current conditions remain the same or deteriorate. If things improve, or if they secure additional capital, they should be okay. If they go underwater, it’s likely the feds will step in, too big to fail, another corporate welfare bailout.
And I agree about the psychological impact of such a large failure, BTW. It would not be good.
July 19, 2008 at 4:31 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #243055gandalf
ParticipantLooking at the numbers, I’m guessing WAMU has about a year left, assuming current conditions remain the same or deteriorate. If things improve, or if they secure additional capital, they should be okay. If they go underwater, it’s likely the feds will step in, too big to fail, another corporate welfare bailout.
And I agree about the psychological impact of such a large failure, BTW. It would not be good.
July 19, 2008 at 4:31 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #243110gandalf
ParticipantLooking at the numbers, I’m guessing WAMU has about a year left, assuming current conditions remain the same or deteriorate. If things improve, or if they secure additional capital, they should be okay. If they go underwater, it’s likely the feds will step in, too big to fail, another corporate welfare bailout.
And I agree about the psychological impact of such a large failure, BTW. It would not be good.
July 19, 2008 at 4:31 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #243121gandalf
ParticipantLooking at the numbers, I’m guessing WAMU has about a year left, assuming current conditions remain the same or deteriorate. If things improve, or if they secure additional capital, they should be okay. If they go underwater, it’s likely the feds will step in, too big to fail, another corporate welfare bailout.
And I agree about the psychological impact of such a large failure, BTW. It would not be good.
July 19, 2008 at 4:10 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #242896gandalf
ParticipantAmen. We had a good OT politics thread about a month ago. There was a good straightforward exchange of views, different sides of the issues, consideration, mostly respectful. Here and there the usual freak-show types, replete with usual “You must believe what I do” syndrome.
BTW, I suspect jfiq and Marion are related. Soul mates, cut from the same cloth. Both of them from crazy-land.
Hey Allan, what did you think of Al Gore’s speech the other day? Politics aside, I was pleased to hear the energy and national security connection being put forward. As you know, I think improving our strategic position vis-a-vis energy supplies is the key to advancing our foreign policy interests, getting the upper hand in dealing with the Middle East. So I liked what he had to say, overall. (BTW, I voted against Gore. Yeah, I know.)
In the next few posts, we get to listen to ranting partisan hacks ramble about Gore and global warming… (They’re annoying aren’t they?)
July 19, 2008 at 4:10 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #243039gandalf
ParticipantAmen. We had a good OT politics thread about a month ago. There was a good straightforward exchange of views, different sides of the issues, consideration, mostly respectful. Here and there the usual freak-show types, replete with usual “You must believe what I do” syndrome.
BTW, I suspect jfiq and Marion are related. Soul mates, cut from the same cloth. Both of them from crazy-land.
Hey Allan, what did you think of Al Gore’s speech the other day? Politics aside, I was pleased to hear the energy and national security connection being put forward. As you know, I think improving our strategic position vis-a-vis energy supplies is the key to advancing our foreign policy interests, getting the upper hand in dealing with the Middle East. So I liked what he had to say, overall. (BTW, I voted against Gore. Yeah, I know.)
In the next few posts, we get to listen to ranting partisan hacks ramble about Gore and global warming… (They’re annoying aren’t they?)
July 19, 2008 at 4:10 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #243049gandalf
ParticipantAmen. We had a good OT politics thread about a month ago. There was a good straightforward exchange of views, different sides of the issues, consideration, mostly respectful. Here and there the usual freak-show types, replete with usual “You must believe what I do” syndrome.
BTW, I suspect jfiq and Marion are related. Soul mates, cut from the same cloth. Both of them from crazy-land.
Hey Allan, what did you think of Al Gore’s speech the other day? Politics aside, I was pleased to hear the energy and national security connection being put forward. As you know, I think improving our strategic position vis-a-vis energy supplies is the key to advancing our foreign policy interests, getting the upper hand in dealing with the Middle East. So I liked what he had to say, overall. (BTW, I voted against Gore. Yeah, I know.)
In the next few posts, we get to listen to ranting partisan hacks ramble about Gore and global warming… (They’re annoying aren’t they?)
July 19, 2008 at 4:10 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #243104gandalf
ParticipantAmen. We had a good OT politics thread about a month ago. There was a good straightforward exchange of views, different sides of the issues, consideration, mostly respectful. Here and there the usual freak-show types, replete with usual “You must believe what I do” syndrome.
BTW, I suspect jfiq and Marion are related. Soul mates, cut from the same cloth. Both of them from crazy-land.
Hey Allan, what did you think of Al Gore’s speech the other day? Politics aside, I was pleased to hear the energy and national security connection being put forward. As you know, I think improving our strategic position vis-a-vis energy supplies is the key to advancing our foreign policy interests, getting the upper hand in dealing with the Middle East. So I liked what he had to say, overall. (BTW, I voted against Gore. Yeah, I know.)
In the next few posts, we get to listen to ranting partisan hacks ramble about Gore and global warming… (They’re annoying aren’t they?)
July 19, 2008 at 4:10 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #243113gandalf
ParticipantAmen. We had a good OT politics thread about a month ago. There was a good straightforward exchange of views, different sides of the issues, consideration, mostly respectful. Here and there the usual freak-show types, replete with usual “You must believe what I do” syndrome.
BTW, I suspect jfiq and Marion are related. Soul mates, cut from the same cloth. Both of them from crazy-land.
Hey Allan, what did you think of Al Gore’s speech the other day? Politics aside, I was pleased to hear the energy and national security connection being put forward. As you know, I think improving our strategic position vis-a-vis energy supplies is the key to advancing our foreign policy interests, getting the upper hand in dealing with the Middle East. So I liked what he had to say, overall. (BTW, I voted against Gore. Yeah, I know.)
In the next few posts, we get to listen to ranting partisan hacks ramble about Gore and global warming… (They’re annoying aren’t they?)
gandalf
ParticipantThat’s interesting. On the corporate side, I believe our software purchases are expensed at the time of purchase, as opposed to capitalizing them as a durable equipment asset and following a depreciation schedule. Makes sense.
gandalf
ParticipantThat’s interesting. On the corporate side, I believe our software purchases are expensed at the time of purchase, as opposed to capitalizing them as a durable equipment asset and following a depreciation schedule. Makes sense.
gandalf
ParticipantThat’s interesting. On the corporate side, I believe our software purchases are expensed at the time of purchase, as opposed to capitalizing them as a durable equipment asset and following a depreciation schedule. Makes sense.
gandalf
ParticipantThat’s interesting. On the corporate side, I believe our software purchases are expensed at the time of purchase, as opposed to capitalizing them as a durable equipment asset and following a depreciation schedule. Makes sense.
gandalf
ParticipantThat’s interesting. On the corporate side, I believe our software purchases are expensed at the time of purchase, as opposed to capitalizing them as a durable equipment asset and following a depreciation schedule. Makes sense.
-
AuthorPosts
