Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
gandalf
ParticipantOMG, that made my side hurt!!!
LMAO…
ParticipantOMG, that made my side hurt!!!
LMAO…
ParticipantOMG, that made my side hurt!!!
LMAO…
ParticipantOMG, that made my side hurt!!!
LMAO…
October 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT – Inside Obama’s “Tax Cut” Can you say Redistribution! #287289ParticipantThat’s right. Income from a conceptual point of view is a positive change in wealth year over year. Income to a CFO or tax accountant is a whole different subject. Any discussions of tax policy that fail to address the definition of income are generally partisan bullshit.
That’s how you can tell if someone is full of shit, BTW. When they talk about income taxes being unfair but don’t talk about definitions of income.
Republicans used to be, but are not anymore, the party of conservatism and fiscal responsibility. Saying “Democrats are tax-n-spend socialists” is pretty much a joke now.
Want to blame ‘Wall Street’ or ‘Washington’? That would be okay. I agree. Think it’s a party issue? Democrats are going to steal your money, and republicans are for small government and fiscal sensibility? That’s a joke.
October 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT – Inside Obama’s “Tax Cut” Can you say Redistribution! #287588ParticipantThat’s right. Income from a conceptual point of view is a positive change in wealth year over year. Income to a CFO or tax accountant is a whole different subject. Any discussions of tax policy that fail to address the definition of income are generally partisan bullshit.
That’s how you can tell if someone is full of shit, BTW. When they talk about income taxes being unfair but don’t talk about definitions of income.
Republicans used to be, but are not anymore, the party of conservatism and fiscal responsibility. Saying “Democrats are tax-n-spend socialists” is pretty much a joke now.
Want to blame ‘Wall Street’ or ‘Washington’? That would be okay. I agree. Think it’s a party issue? Democrats are going to steal your money, and republicans are for small government and fiscal sensibility? That’s a joke.
October 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT – Inside Obama’s “Tax Cut” Can you say Redistribution! #287605ParticipantThat’s right. Income from a conceptual point of view is a positive change in wealth year over year. Income to a CFO or tax accountant is a whole different subject. Any discussions of tax policy that fail to address the definition of income are generally partisan bullshit.
That’s how you can tell if someone is full of shit, BTW. When they talk about income taxes being unfair but don’t talk about definitions of income.
Republicans used to be, but are not anymore, the party of conservatism and fiscal responsibility. Saying “Democrats are tax-n-spend socialists” is pretty much a joke now.
Want to blame ‘Wall Street’ or ‘Washington’? That would be okay. I agree. Think it’s a party issue? Democrats are going to steal your money, and republicans are for small government and fiscal sensibility? That’s a joke.
October 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT – Inside Obama’s “Tax Cut” Can you say Redistribution! #287632ParticipantThat’s right. Income from a conceptual point of view is a positive change in wealth year over year. Income to a CFO or tax accountant is a whole different subject. Any discussions of tax policy that fail to address the definition of income are generally partisan bullshit.
That’s how you can tell if someone is full of shit, BTW. When they talk about income taxes being unfair but don’t talk about definitions of income.
Republicans used to be, but are not anymore, the party of conservatism and fiscal responsibility. Saying “Democrats are tax-n-spend socialists” is pretty much a joke now.
Want to blame ‘Wall Street’ or ‘Washington’? That would be okay. I agree. Think it’s a party issue? Democrats are going to steal your money, and republicans are for small government and fiscal sensibility? That’s a joke.
October 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT – Inside Obama’s “Tax Cut” Can you say Redistribution! #287636ParticipantThat’s right. Income from a conceptual point of view is a positive change in wealth year over year. Income to a CFO or tax accountant is a whole different subject. Any discussions of tax policy that fail to address the definition of income are generally partisan bullshit.
That’s how you can tell if someone is full of shit, BTW. When they talk about income taxes being unfair but don’t talk about definitions of income.
Republicans used to be, but are not anymore, the party of conservatism and fiscal responsibility. Saying “Democrats are tax-n-spend socialists” is pretty much a joke now.
Want to blame ‘Wall Street’ or ‘Washington’? That would be okay. I agree. Think it’s a party issue? Democrats are going to steal your money, and republicans are for small government and fiscal sensibility? That’s a joke.
October 13, 2008 at 1:28 AM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286618Participantsfax, wouldn’t worry too much about jfiq. He gets ‘Frequent Blogger Points’ from the McCain campaign every time he posts that ridiculous crud. Here and there a thoughtful post, not so partisan, but mostly noise. Such is life.
October 13, 2008 at 1:28 AM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286912Participantsfax, wouldn’t worry too much about jfiq. He gets ‘Frequent Blogger Points’ from the McCain campaign every time he posts that ridiculous crud. Here and there a thoughtful post, not so partisan, but mostly noise. Such is life.
October 13, 2008 at 1:28 AM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286929Participantsfax, wouldn’t worry too much about jfiq. He gets ‘Frequent Blogger Points’ from the McCain campaign every time he posts that ridiculous crud. Here and there a thoughtful post, not so partisan, but mostly noise. Such is life.
October 13, 2008 at 1:28 AM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286957Participantsfax, wouldn’t worry too much about jfiq. He gets ‘Frequent Blogger Points’ from the McCain campaign every time he posts that ridiculous crud. Here and there a thoughtful post, not so partisan, but mostly noise. Such is life.
October 13, 2008 at 1:28 AM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286960Participantsfax, wouldn’t worry too much about jfiq. He gets ‘Frequent Blogger Points’ from the McCain campaign every time he posts that ridiculous crud. Here and there a thoughtful post, not so partisan, but mostly noise. Such is life.
-
AuthorPosts
