Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 17, 2008 at 8:39 AM in reply to: My letter to my congressman and Senetors, what do you think of it? #240995July 17, 2008 at 8:39 AM in reply to: My letter to my congressman and Senetors, what do you think of it? #240998
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantI agree with ucodegen on the oil issue. The end price is not really being driven by speculators.
So, most here would likely agree with your main points on housing, but many might disagree on the oil thing.ParticipantI would not voluntarily sell in today’s market in most parts of San Diego.
ParticipantI would not voluntarily sell in today’s market in most parts of San Diego.
ParticipantI would not voluntarily sell in today’s market in most parts of San Diego.
ParticipantI would not voluntarily sell in today’s market in most parts of San Diego.
ParticipantI would not voluntarily sell in today’s market in most parts of San Diego.
July 17, 2008 at 8:29 AM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #240782ParticipantI’m not really an Obama supporter. I like most of these changes. These seem like rational, real-world, pragmatic positions, rather than the rhetorical idealistic positions held previously.
One example: Iraq – Do you want him to say that regardless of the conditions on the ground he should order an immediate withdrawal, based on the fact that 10-12 months ago he thought that was the proper course of action. Just to save face ? To me, adapting to what has changed in Iraq and the willingness to reconsider his position is a HUGE improvement over GWB, who usually takes a position and never lets go, regardless.
These changes demonstrate adaptibility and maturity. He’s starting to me to look more electable and presidential, rather than an idealogue.
July 17, 2008 at 8:29 AM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #240918ParticipantI’m not really an Obama supporter. I like most of these changes. These seem like rational, real-world, pragmatic positions, rather than the rhetorical idealistic positions held previously.
One example: Iraq – Do you want him to say that regardless of the conditions on the ground he should order an immediate withdrawal, based on the fact that 10-12 months ago he thought that was the proper course of action. Just to save face ? To me, adapting to what has changed in Iraq and the willingness to reconsider his position is a HUGE improvement over GWB, who usually takes a position and never lets go, regardless.
These changes demonstrate adaptibility and maturity. He’s starting to me to look more electable and presidential, rather than an idealogue.
July 17, 2008 at 8:29 AM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #240926ParticipantI’m not really an Obama supporter. I like most of these changes. These seem like rational, real-world, pragmatic positions, rather than the rhetorical idealistic positions held previously.
One example: Iraq – Do you want him to say that regardless of the conditions on the ground he should order an immediate withdrawal, based on the fact that 10-12 months ago he thought that was the proper course of action. Just to save face ? To me, adapting to what has changed in Iraq and the willingness to reconsider his position is a HUGE improvement over GWB, who usually takes a position and never lets go, regardless.
These changes demonstrate adaptibility and maturity. He’s starting to me to look more electable and presidential, rather than an idealogue.
July 17, 2008 at 8:29 AM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #240979ParticipantI’m not really an Obama supporter. I like most of these changes. These seem like rational, real-world, pragmatic positions, rather than the rhetorical idealistic positions held previously.
One example: Iraq – Do you want him to say that regardless of the conditions on the ground he should order an immediate withdrawal, based on the fact that 10-12 months ago he thought that was the proper course of action. Just to save face ? To me, adapting to what has changed in Iraq and the willingness to reconsider his position is a HUGE improvement over GWB, who usually takes a position and never lets go, regardless.
These changes demonstrate adaptibility and maturity. He’s starting to me to look more electable and presidential, rather than an idealogue.
July 17, 2008 at 8:29 AM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #240983ParticipantI’m not really an Obama supporter. I like most of these changes. These seem like rational, real-world, pragmatic positions, rather than the rhetorical idealistic positions held previously.
One example: Iraq – Do you want him to say that regardless of the conditions on the ground he should order an immediate withdrawal, based on the fact that 10-12 months ago he thought that was the proper course of action. Just to save face ? To me, adapting to what has changed in Iraq and the willingness to reconsider his position is a HUGE improvement over GWB, who usually takes a position and never lets go, regardless.
These changes demonstrate adaptibility and maturity. He’s starting to me to look more electable and presidential, rather than an idealogue.
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]peterb: I mentioned something similar to this on another thread when I said I thought we’d see a return to 1930s style WPA-type projects (i.e. infrastructure related goverment spending on a very large scale).
The US infrastructure is in a dire state, and it will probably take massive amounts of government spending (a la what occurred during FDR’s reconstruction programs, WWII, or the Japanese government programs of the 1990s) to turn things around.[/quote]
Maybe be are due for a New Deal type of initiative. But this time it should be focused on achieving energy independence.
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]peterb: I mentioned something similar to this on another thread when I said I thought we’d see a return to 1930s style WPA-type projects (i.e. infrastructure related goverment spending on a very large scale).
The US infrastructure is in a dire state, and it will probably take massive amounts of government spending (a la what occurred during FDR’s reconstruction programs, WWII, or the Japanese government programs of the 1990s) to turn things around.[/quote]
Maybe be are due for a New Deal type of initiative. But this time it should be focused on achieving energy independence.
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]peterb: I mentioned something similar to this on another thread when I said I thought we’d see a return to 1930s style WPA-type projects (i.e. infrastructure related goverment spending on a very large scale).
The US infrastructure is in a dire state, and it will probably take massive amounts of government spending (a la what occurred during FDR’s reconstruction programs, WWII, or the Japanese government programs of the 1990s) to turn things around.[/quote]
Maybe be are due for a New Deal type of initiative. But this time it should be focused on achieving energy independence.
-
AuthorPosts
