[fm]

It’s possible that it just means no cost to you, and that they cover the cost of the PMI. Not really sure. However, when I asked about this loan, I was told it was going to be higher than a regular loan (in order to cover the cost of no closing costs in the long run).

Or, if they don’t pay PMI, then it might be hard to qualify.

[fm]

It’s possible that it just means no cost to you, and that they cover the cost of the PMI. Not really sure. However, when I asked about this loan, I was told it was going to be higher than a regular loan (in order to cover the cost of no closing costs in the long run).

Or, if they don’t pay PMI, then it might be hard to qualify.

[fm]

It’s possible that it just means no cost to you, and that they cover the cost of the PMI. Not really sure. However, when I asked about this loan, I was told it was going to be higher than a regular loan (in order to cover the cost of no closing costs in the long run).

Or, if they don’t pay PMI, then it might be hard to qualify.

[fm]

It’s possible that it just means no cost to you, and that they cover the cost of the PMI. Not really sure. However, when I asked about this loan, I was told it was going to be higher than a regular loan (in order to cover the cost of no closing costs in the long run).

Or, if they don’t pay PMI, then it might be hard to qualify.

[fm]

It’s possible that it just means no cost to you, and that they cover the cost of the PMI. Not really sure. However, when I asked about this loan, I was told it was going to be higher than a regular loan (in order to cover the cost of no closing costs in the long run).

Or, if they don’t pay PMI, then it might be hard to qualify.

[fm]

Depends on how you think people will act. Let’s say the household income is 100k, at 20% down (30 yr, 6.5%) a mortgage of about $2200 monthly is doable (~28% of gross income), which leads to a house price around $440k, but if only 10% down then to stay at that monthly mortgage the house would have to be about $390. Basically this is what would be “affordable” with that income at those down payments. It could always go lower of course.

[fm]

Depends on how you think people will act. Let’s say the household income is 100k, at 20% down (30 yr, 6.5%) a mortgage of about $2200 monthly is doable (~28% of gross income), which leads to a house price around $440k, but if only 10% down then to stay at that monthly mortgage the house would have to be about $390. Basically this is what would be “affordable” with that income at those down payments. It could always go lower of course.

[fm]

Depends on how you think people will act. Let’s say the household income is 100k, at 20% down (30 yr, 6.5%) a mortgage of about $2200 monthly is doable (~28% of gross income), which leads to a house price around $440k, but if only 10% down then to stay at that monthly mortgage the house would have to be about $390. Basically this is what would be “affordable” with that income at those down payments. It could always go lower of course.

[fm]

Depends on how you think people will act. Let’s say the household income is 100k, at 20% down (30 yr, 6.5%) a mortgage of about $2200 monthly is doable (~28% of gross income), which leads to a house price around $440k, but if only 10% down then to stay at that monthly mortgage the house would have to be about $390. Basically this is what would be “affordable” with that income at those down payments. It could always go lower of course.

[fm]

Depends on how you think people will act. Let’s say the household income is 100k, at 20% down (30 yr, 6.5%) a mortgage of about $2200 monthly is doable (~28% of gross income), which leads to a house price around $440k, but if only 10% down then to stay at that monthly mortgage the house would have to be about $390. Basically this is what would be “affordable” with that income at those down payments. It could always go lower of course.

[fm]

[quote=LuckyInOC]This is how OC solves its water problem..

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jan/02/local/me-reclaim2

Amaizingly good article from LA Times…

Lucky In OC[/quote]

I saw that on TV, where they toured the plant. However, in San Diego that is called “toilet to tap,” and people (at least the governing officials) have not wanted this.

[fm]

[quote=LuckyInOC]This is how OC solves its water problem..

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jan/02/local/me-reclaim2

Amaizingly good article from LA Times…

Lucky In OC[/quote]

I saw that on TV, where they toured the plant. However, in San Diego that is called “toilet to tap,” and people (at least the governing officials) have not wanted this.

[fm]

[quote=LuckyInOC]This is how OC solves its water problem..

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jan/02/local/me-reclaim2

Amaizingly good article from LA Times…

Lucky In OC[/quote]

I saw that on TV, where they toured the plant. However, in San Diego that is called “toilet to tap,” and people (at least the governing officials) have not wanted this.

[fm]

[quote=LuckyInOC]This is how OC solves its water problem..

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jan/02/local/me-reclaim2

Amaizingly good article from LA Times…

Lucky In OC[/quote]

I saw that on TV, where they toured the plant. However, in San Diego that is called “toilet to tap,” and people (at least the governing officials) have not wanted this.

[fm]

[quote=LuckyInOC]This is how OC solves its water problem..

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jan/02/local/me-reclaim2

Amaizingly good article from LA Times…

Lucky In OC[/quote]

I saw that on TV, where they toured the plant. However, in San Diego that is called “toilet to tap,” and people (at least the governing officials) have not wanted this.

[Author]

Posts