Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
faterikcartman
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=joec]This is pretty interesting. Out of curiosity, do they do the higher assessment to raise more revenue or is it a power trip thing for the assessors?[/quote]
None of the above, joec, it’s automatic in keeping with Prop 13. Your assessment will be raised 2% per year unless you fight it (or unless the assessor has automatically lowered it [temporarily]) as they have many in hard-hit areas.[/quote]
Um, I’m guessing the amounts the OP is talking about have nothing to do with 2% a year.
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=joec]This is pretty interesting. Out of curiosity, do they do the higher assessment to raise more revenue or is it a power trip thing for the assessors?[/quote]
None of the above, joec, it’s automatic in keeping with Prop 13. Your assessment will be raised 2% per year unless you fight it (or unless the assessor has automatically lowered it [temporarily]) as they have many in hard-hit areas.[/quote]
Um, I’m guessing the amounts the OP is talking about have nothing to do with 2% a year.
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=joec]This is pretty interesting. Out of curiosity, do they do the higher assessment to raise more revenue or is it a power trip thing for the assessors?[/quote]
None of the above, joec, it’s automatic in keeping with Prop 13. Your assessment will be raised 2% per year unless you fight it (or unless the assessor has automatically lowered it [temporarily]) as they have many in hard-hit areas.[/quote]
Um, I’m guessing the amounts the OP is talking about have nothing to do with 2% a year.
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=joec]This is pretty interesting. Out of curiosity, do they do the higher assessment to raise more revenue or is it a power trip thing for the assessors?[/quote]
None of the above, joec, it’s automatic in keeping with Prop 13. Your assessment will be raised 2% per year unless you fight it (or unless the assessor has automatically lowered it [temporarily]) as they have many in hard-hit areas.[/quote]
Um, I’m guessing the amounts the OP is talking about have nothing to do with 2% a year.
Participant[quote=davelj] If FOREIGNERS start selling long-term US Treasuries (or not buying them “when issued”), THEN we have a problem. [/quote]
As I’m sure you know Dave, the canary in the coal mine reads like this: “If CHINA starts selling […] or not buying […]”.
Participant[quote=davelj] If FOREIGNERS start selling long-term US Treasuries (or not buying them “when issued”), THEN we have a problem. [/quote]
As I’m sure you know Dave, the canary in the coal mine reads like this: “If CHINA starts selling […] or not buying […]”.
Participant[quote=davelj] If FOREIGNERS start selling long-term US Treasuries (or not buying them “when issued”), THEN we have a problem. [/quote]
As I’m sure you know Dave, the canary in the coal mine reads like this: “If CHINA starts selling […] or not buying […]”.
Participant[quote=davelj] If FOREIGNERS start selling long-term US Treasuries (or not buying them “when issued”), THEN we have a problem. [/quote]
As I’m sure you know Dave, the canary in the coal mine reads like this: “If CHINA starts selling […] or not buying […]”.
Participant[quote=davelj] If FOREIGNERS start selling long-term US Treasuries (or not buying them “when issued”), THEN we have a problem. [/quote]
As I’m sure you know Dave, the canary in the coal mine reads like this: “If CHINA starts selling […] or not buying […]”.
ParticipantUR — I can’t imagine title companies covering this sort of thing. Have you read the exclusions lately? Anything that isn’t a public record located at X, Y, or Z is probably not going to be covered. Nor can I imagine most ever getting near this sort of coverage via a standard policy.
ParticipantUR — I can’t imagine title companies covering this sort of thing. Have you read the exclusions lately? Anything that isn’t a public record located at X, Y, or Z is probably not going to be covered. Nor can I imagine most ever getting near this sort of coverage via a standard policy.
ParticipantUR — I can’t imagine title companies covering this sort of thing. Have you read the exclusions lately? Anything that isn’t a public record located at X, Y, or Z is probably not going to be covered. Nor can I imagine most ever getting near this sort of coverage via a standard policy.
ParticipantUR — I can’t imagine title companies covering this sort of thing. Have you read the exclusions lately? Anything that isn’t a public record located at X, Y, or Z is probably not going to be covered. Nor can I imagine most ever getting near this sort of coverage via a standard policy.
ParticipantUR — I can’t imagine title companies covering this sort of thing. Have you read the exclusions lately? Anything that isn’t a public record located at X, Y, or Z is probably not going to be covered. Nor can I imagine most ever getting near this sort of coverage via a standard policy.
-
AuthorPosts
