Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
equalizer
ParticipantJust amazing. After selling their place at bubble prices to likely first time home buyers (who could have been disabled single mom veteran) people still feel that they are throwing their money away on rent. Thats why, like the Donald, we Piggs pledge to never sell so we don’t end up throwing our money away. Why rent when you can end up in better situation like the US Congresswoman?
equalizer
ParticipantJust amazing. After selling their place at bubble prices to likely first time home buyers (who could have been disabled single mom veteran) people still feel that they are throwing their money away on rent. Thats why, like the Donald, we Piggs pledge to never sell so we don’t end up throwing our money away. Why rent when you can end up in better situation like the US Congresswoman?
equalizer
ParticipantJust amazing. After selling their place at bubble prices to likely first time home buyers (who could have been disabled single mom veteran) people still feel that they are throwing their money away on rent. Thats why, like the Donald, we Piggs pledge to never sell so we don’t end up throwing our money away. Why rent when you can end up in better situation like the US Congresswoman?
equalizer
ParticipantJust amazing. After selling their place at bubble prices to likely first time home buyers (who could have been disabled single mom veteran) people still feel that they are throwing their money away on rent. Thats why, like the Donald, we Piggs pledge to never sell so we don’t end up throwing our money away. Why rent when you can end up in better situation like the US Congresswoman?
equalizer
ParticipantJust amazing. After selling their place at bubble prices to likely first time home buyers (who could have been disabled single mom veteran) people still feel that they are throwing their money away on rent. Thats why, like the Donald, we Piggs pledge to never sell so we don’t end up throwing our money away. Why rent when you can end up in better situation like the US Congresswoman?
equalizer
ParticipantPrivate companies would be prosecuted for deceptive marketing practices if they promised multi-million dollar payouts, but only paid only 50K per year per million won. Only recently has CA given lump sump payout option. So JSP winning a few million is typically only getting a 100-200K per year but thinks he is rich and speding like he has 6M in the bank. Pretty stupid, but then again most people (even here) think he had 6M in the bank.
equalizer
ParticipantPrivate companies would be prosecuted for deceptive marketing practices if they promised multi-million dollar payouts, but only paid only 50K per year per million won. Only recently has CA given lump sump payout option. So JSP winning a few million is typically only getting a 100-200K per year but thinks he is rich and speding like he has 6M in the bank. Pretty stupid, but then again most people (even here) think he had 6M in the bank.
equalizer
ParticipantPrivate companies would be prosecuted for deceptive marketing practices if they promised multi-million dollar payouts, but only paid only 50K per year per million won. Only recently has CA given lump sump payout option. So JSP winning a few million is typically only getting a 100-200K per year but thinks he is rich and speding like he has 6M in the bank. Pretty stupid, but then again most people (even here) think he had 6M in the bank.
equalizer
ParticipantPrivate companies would be prosecuted for deceptive marketing practices if they promised multi-million dollar payouts, but only paid only 50K per year per million won. Only recently has CA given lump sump payout option. So JSP winning a few million is typically only getting a 100-200K per year but thinks he is rich and speding like he has 6M in the bank. Pretty stupid, but then again most people (even here) think he had 6M in the bank.
equalizer
ParticipantPrivate companies would be prosecuted for deceptive marketing practices if they promised multi-million dollar payouts, but only paid only 50K per year per million won. Only recently has CA given lump sump payout option. So JSP winning a few million is typically only getting a 100-200K per year but thinks he is rich and speding like he has 6M in the bank. Pretty stupid, but then again most people (even here) think he had 6M in the bank.
equalizer
Participantrubbies,
We are in agreement on the outcome. Didn’t mean to imply anything neg(except losing elections). I acknowledge your family has done more for this country than many (OK, most)of my party leaders. You have strong feelings and I would appreciate if you could explain why you feel appeasing the gay ruling this year would help more people in the country than not supporting this ruling. Is there any dem who is willing to tell the gays that
“For the greater good, stand down”.If its strictly on principle, then, well you know the outcome and you can’t blame me for not warning you.
equalizer
Participantrubbies,
We are in agreement on the outcome. Didn’t mean to imply anything neg(except losing elections). I acknowledge your family has done more for this country than many (OK, most)of my party leaders. You have strong feelings and I would appreciate if you could explain why you feel appeasing the gay ruling this year would help more people in the country than not supporting this ruling. Is there any dem who is willing to tell the gays that
“For the greater good, stand down”.If its strictly on principle, then, well you know the outcome and you can’t blame me for not warning you.
equalizer
Participantrubbies,
We are in agreement on the outcome. Didn’t mean to imply anything neg(except losing elections). I acknowledge your family has done more for this country than many (OK, most)of my party leaders. You have strong feelings and I would appreciate if you could explain why you feel appeasing the gay ruling this year would help more people in the country than not supporting this ruling. Is there any dem who is willing to tell the gays that
“For the greater good, stand down”.If its strictly on principle, then, well you know the outcome and you can’t blame me for not warning you.
equalizer
Participantrubbies,
We are in agreement on the outcome. Didn’t mean to imply anything neg(except losing elections). I acknowledge your family has done more for this country than many (OK, most)of my party leaders. You have strong feelings and I would appreciate if you could explain why you feel appeasing the gay ruling this year would help more people in the country than not supporting this ruling. Is there any dem who is willing to tell the gays that
“For the greater good, stand down”.If its strictly on principle, then, well you know the outcome and you can’t blame me for not warning you.
-
AuthorPosts
