[equalizer]

On related note, Where is the Anthrax killer? Rendition is sometimes required and if so why NOT in this case. Someone killed 5 people with the deadly warfare agent and injured 17 and now the feds (my money) paid $5M to Hatfield for (feds) ostensibly doing nothing wrong. As soon as Hatfield is mentioned, all mailing stop, makes the feds think, Hmmm. And the cover up with the reporters who “forget” where they got the source info. Why is the press details hidden and covered up? What are the 5 reporters hiding? The source for the anthrax is most likely someone like Hatfield, very very few people have access to that specific agent. Contrary to scaremail, deadly agents are extremely difficult to make outside full scale lab. So, if the mailing continued weekly, would not rendition of the reporters and all people with access to deadly agent be reasonable for protection of public?

If I went to Harvard Law I could tell you why feds get to steal my money to pay someone and deny they did anything wrong. Is this so they don’t have to discipline bosses? Other people’s money, gotta love as Danny Devito said.

[equalizer]

It probably does but you need the builder to stay in business. That’s why it is key to buy from builder with long history in San Diego. Can someone provide a list of builders (not shell companies that exist in name only) that were around in 80’s and survived the crash of the 90’s and still around today? Possibily Shea?

[equalizer]

It probably does but you need the builder to stay in business. That’s why it is key to buy from builder with long history in San Diego. Can someone provide a list of builders (not shell companies that exist in name only) that were around in 80’s and survived the crash of the 90’s and still around today? Possibily Shea?

[equalizer]

It probably does but you need the builder to stay in business. That’s why it is key to buy from builder with long history in San Diego. Can someone provide a list of builders (not shell companies that exist in name only) that were around in 80’s and survived the crash of the 90’s and still around today? Possibily Shea?

[equalizer]

It probably does but you need the builder to stay in business. That’s why it is key to buy from builder with long history in San Diego. Can someone provide a list of builders (not shell companies that exist in name only) that were around in 80’s and survived the crash of the 90’s and still around today? Possibily Shea?

[equalizer]

It probably does but you need the builder to stay in business. That’s why it is key to buy from builder with long history in San Diego. Can someone provide a list of builders (not shell companies that exist in name only) that were around in 80’s and survived the crash of the 90’s and still around today? Possibily Shea?

[equalizer]

Not sure if you meant oil sands or oil shale. Oil shale extraction has been thermodynamic nightmare so far.

“As with oil sands, enormous amounts of energy would be needed for both the heating and freezing processes. Rand estimates that a single 100,000-barrel-a-day operation would require a dedicated 1.2-gigawatt electricity generating station–a size that would be comparable to one of the nation’s largest power plants, like the New Hampshire nuclear giant, Seabrook, which serves 900,000 customers.” Need lot of nukes, 10-15 year lead time and $5-10Billion a pop. older USNews article

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/biztech/articles/060424/24oil_4.htm

If that oil process is profitable at $5 up, then wouldn’t new oil supply drive down prices? Then prices would drop below $5 and new process would no longer be profitable. It’s a recursive decision analysis not unlike macroeconomic decision and game theory. Luckily, you don’t need a PhD to figure out this game, just read what Lee Raymond, Goldman and company say in Petroleum Intelligence Weekly. Sorry, it is $3K/yr for a subscription. 30 day free trial.
http://www.energyintel.com/PublicationHomePage.asp?publication_id=4

Some refresher notes on game theory:
http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/whatis.htm

[equalizer]

Not sure if you meant oil sands or oil shale. Oil shale extraction has been thermodynamic nightmare so far.

“As with oil sands, enormous amounts of energy would be needed for both the heating and freezing processes. Rand estimates that a single 100,000-barrel-a-day operation would require a dedicated 1.2-gigawatt electricity generating station–a size that would be comparable to one of the nation’s largest power plants, like the New Hampshire nuclear giant, Seabrook, which serves 900,000 customers.” Need lot of nukes, 10-15 year lead time and $5-10Billion a pop. older USNews article

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/biztech/articles/060424/24oil_4.htm

If that oil process is profitable at $5 up, then wouldn’t new oil supply drive down prices? Then prices would drop below $5 and new process would no longer be profitable. It’s a recursive decision analysis not unlike macroeconomic decision and game theory. Luckily, you don’t need a PhD to figure out this game, just read what Lee Raymond, Goldman and company say in Petroleum Intelligence Weekly. Sorry, it is $3K/yr for a subscription. 30 day free trial.
http://www.energyintel.com/PublicationHomePage.asp?publication_id=4

Some refresher notes on game theory:
http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/whatis.htm

[equalizer]

Not sure if you meant oil sands or oil shale. Oil shale extraction has been thermodynamic nightmare so far.

“As with oil sands, enormous amounts of energy would be needed for both the heating and freezing processes. Rand estimates that a single 100,000-barrel-a-day operation would require a dedicated 1.2-gigawatt electricity generating station–a size that would be comparable to one of the nation’s largest power plants, like the New Hampshire nuclear giant, Seabrook, which serves 900,000 customers.” Need lot of nukes, 10-15 year lead time and $5-10Billion a pop. older USNews article

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/biztech/articles/060424/24oil_4.htm

If that oil process is profitable at $5 up, then wouldn’t new oil supply drive down prices? Then prices would drop below $5 and new process would no longer be profitable. It’s a recursive decision analysis not unlike macroeconomic decision and game theory. Luckily, you don’t need a PhD to figure out this game, just read what Lee Raymond, Goldman and company say in Petroleum Intelligence Weekly. Sorry, it is $3K/yr for a subscription. 30 day free trial.
http://www.energyintel.com/PublicationHomePage.asp?publication_id=4

Some refresher notes on game theory:
http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/whatis.htm

[equalizer]

Not sure if you meant oil sands or oil shale. Oil shale extraction has been thermodynamic nightmare so far.

“As with oil sands, enormous amounts of energy would be needed for both the heating and freezing processes. Rand estimates that a single 100,000-barrel-a-day operation would require a dedicated 1.2-gigawatt electricity generating station–a size that would be comparable to one of the nation’s largest power plants, like the New Hampshire nuclear giant, Seabrook, which serves 900,000 customers.” Need lot of nukes, 10-15 year lead time and $5-10Billion a pop. older USNews article

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/biztech/articles/060424/24oil_4.htm

If that oil process is profitable at $5 up, then wouldn’t new oil supply drive down prices? Then prices would drop below $5 and new process would no longer be profitable. It’s a recursive decision analysis not unlike macroeconomic decision and game theory. Luckily, you don’t need a PhD to figure out this game, just read what Lee Raymond, Goldman and company say in Petroleum Intelligence Weekly. Sorry, it is $3K/yr for a subscription. 30 day free trial.
http://www.energyintel.com/PublicationHomePage.asp?publication_id=4

Some refresher notes on game theory:
http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/whatis.htm

[equalizer]

Not sure if you meant oil sands or oil shale. Oil shale extraction has been thermodynamic nightmare so far.

“As with oil sands, enormous amounts of energy would be needed for both the heating and freezing processes. Rand estimates that a single 100,000-barrel-a-day operation would require a dedicated 1.2-gigawatt electricity generating station–a size that would be comparable to one of the nation’s largest power plants, like the New Hampshire nuclear giant, Seabrook, which serves 900,000 customers.” Need lot of nukes, 10-15 year lead time and $5-10Billion a pop. older USNews article

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/biztech/articles/060424/24oil_4.htm

If that oil process is profitable at $5 up, then wouldn’t new oil supply drive down prices? Then prices would drop below $5 and new process would no longer be profitable. It’s a recursive decision analysis not unlike macroeconomic decision and game theory. Luckily, you don’t need a PhD to figure out this game, just read what Lee Raymond, Goldman and company say in Petroleum Intelligence Weekly. Sorry, it is $3K/yr for a subscription. 30 day free trial.
http://www.energyintel.com/PublicationHomePage.asp?publication_id=4

Some refresher notes on game theory:
http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/whatis.htm

[equalizer]

Saw flyer which stated firm wanted $55 for service calls. Then they replace washers, etc instead of replacing faucet, they try to get out of replacing parts. Buy only if you have 20 year old water heater(cost for WH is now over $700) or other major appliance that is way past shelf life.

[equalizer]

Saw flyer which stated firm wanted $55 for service calls. Then they replace washers, etc instead of replacing faucet, they try to get out of replacing parts. Buy only if you have 20 year old water heater(cost for WH is now over $700) or other major appliance that is way past shelf life.

[equalizer]

Saw flyer which stated firm wanted $55 for service calls. Then they replace washers, etc instead of replacing faucet, they try to get out of replacing parts. Buy only if you have 20 year old water heater(cost for WH is now over $700) or other major appliance that is way past shelf life.

[equalizer]

Saw flyer which stated firm wanted $55 for service calls. Then they replace washers, etc instead of replacing faucet, they try to get out of replacing parts. Buy only if you have 20 year old water heater(cost for WH is now over $700) or other major appliance that is way past shelf life.

[Author]

Posts