[equalizer]

Common perception is that dems are traitors. Thus, they are rightfully held to much higher standards.
This is why the O man is talking about nuking iran. Rove would second that motion if he ran the O man’s camp. However, since its way too late to diverge from O man’s party line ways, the new views have ZERO credibility. Does anyone really think for a second that good guys like Veritas (no offense, handy target) would honestly believe the new policies? Wouldn’t most call him a flip flopper and vote for McCain anyway? Still sticking with my mathematically impossible for O man to win.

BTW: These two repbs below have the gravitas, sincerity to forward this resolution without being called names. Big difference, you gotta earn respect.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1865586/posts

On July 12, 2007, Sens. Warner and Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) introduced an amendment to the FY2008 defense appropriations bill that would require the President to devise an exit strategy from Iraq within three months.

[equalizer]

Brooks: Even If Troop Surge Completely Fails, It Will Help McCain Politically

This is from Chris Matthews show Dec 2006. Chris and New York Times columnist David Brooks.

Very obvious from this little clip that troop surge had good or even great likelihood to work. To appease voters, the exec party went in with too few troops, the dems promised to bring troops home and didnt back surge. It took a moronic NYT America hater reporter to figure that out. And yet the stupid dems couldnt understand this 3rd grade logic??? Talk about obstinate. Powell’s two rules were so apt here: go in with overwhelming force (failed since Iraqi army essentially fired) and the Pottery Barn rule (you broke it, you fix it).

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/mccain-brooks/

“David, you think if Bush moves for more troops, following the Army’s advice, McCain’s on board, in fact, his biggest booster, that’s a doubling down for the bet for both those guys. What does it do to McCain’s future?

Mr. BROOKS: Well, I think people look at his conviction. I mean, if you look at every analysis of the war, every book that’s been written about it, it all comes back to three words: not enough troops. And John McCain has been saying that for three years, and the White House did not listen to him for three years, and people are going to remember that, I think.

MATTHEWS: But if it turns out that more troops don’t do the job, is he disproven.

Mr. BROOKS: Right. Well, not at this late date. I mean, then they’ll just say — and I think he’ll say with a lot of justice, it’s too late. And he said that even this week. One more surge, and then we have to look at a new reality. “

[equalizer]

Brooks: Even If Troop Surge Completely Fails, It Will Help McCain Politically

This is from Chris Matthews show Dec 2006. Chris and New York Times columnist David Brooks.

Very obvious from this little clip that troop surge had good or even great likelihood to work. To appease voters, the exec party went in with too few troops, the dems promised to bring troops home and didnt back surge. It took a moronic NYT America hater reporter to figure that out. And yet the stupid dems couldnt understand this 3rd grade logic??? Talk about obstinate. Powell’s two rules were so apt here: go in with overwhelming force (failed since Iraqi army essentially fired) and the Pottery Barn rule (you broke it, you fix it).

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/mccain-brooks/

“David, you think if Bush moves for more troops, following the Army’s advice, McCain’s on board, in fact, his biggest booster, that’s a doubling down for the bet for both those guys. What does it do to McCain’s future?

Mr. BROOKS: Well, I think people look at his conviction. I mean, if you look at every analysis of the war, every book that’s been written about it, it all comes back to three words: not enough troops. And John McCain has been saying that for three years, and the White House did not listen to him for three years, and people are going to remember that, I think.

MATTHEWS: But if it turns out that more troops don’t do the job, is he disproven.

Mr. BROOKS: Right. Well, not at this late date. I mean, then they’ll just say — and I think he’ll say with a lot of justice, it’s too late. And he said that even this week. One more surge, and then we have to look at a new reality. “

[equalizer]

Brooks: Even If Troop Surge Completely Fails, It Will Help McCain Politically

This is from Chris Matthews show Dec 2006. Chris and New York Times columnist David Brooks.

Very obvious from this little clip that troop surge had good or even great likelihood to work. To appease voters, the exec party went in with too few troops, the dems promised to bring troops home and didnt back surge. It took a moronic NYT America hater reporter to figure that out. And yet the stupid dems couldnt understand this 3rd grade logic??? Talk about obstinate. Powell’s two rules were so apt here: go in with overwhelming force (failed since Iraqi army essentially fired) and the Pottery Barn rule (you broke it, you fix it).

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/mccain-brooks/

“David, you think if Bush moves for more troops, following the Army’s advice, McCain’s on board, in fact, his biggest booster, that’s a doubling down for the bet for both those guys. What does it do to McCain’s future?

Mr. BROOKS: Well, I think people look at his conviction. I mean, if you look at every analysis of the war, every book that’s been written about it, it all comes back to three words: not enough troops. And John McCain has been saying that for three years, and the White House did not listen to him for three years, and people are going to remember that, I think.

MATTHEWS: But if it turns out that more troops don’t do the job, is he disproven.

Mr. BROOKS: Right. Well, not at this late date. I mean, then they’ll just say — and I think he’ll say with a lot of justice, it’s too late. And he said that even this week. One more surge, and then we have to look at a new reality. “

[equalizer]

Brooks: Even If Troop Surge Completely Fails, It Will Help McCain Politically

This is from Chris Matthews show Dec 2006. Chris and New York Times columnist David Brooks.

Very obvious from this little clip that troop surge had good or even great likelihood to work. To appease voters, the exec party went in with too few troops, the dems promised to bring troops home and didnt back surge. It took a moronic NYT America hater reporter to figure that out. And yet the stupid dems couldnt understand this 3rd grade logic??? Talk about obstinate. Powell’s two rules were so apt here: go in with overwhelming force (failed since Iraqi army essentially fired) and the Pottery Barn rule (you broke it, you fix it).

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/mccain-brooks/

“David, you think if Bush moves for more troops, following the Army’s advice, McCain’s on board, in fact, his biggest booster, that’s a doubling down for the bet for both those guys. What does it do to McCain’s future?

Mr. BROOKS: Well, I think people look at his conviction. I mean, if you look at every analysis of the war, every book that’s been written about it, it all comes back to three words: not enough troops. And John McCain has been saying that for three years, and the White House did not listen to him for three years, and people are going to remember that, I think.

MATTHEWS: But if it turns out that more troops don’t do the job, is he disproven.

Mr. BROOKS: Right. Well, not at this late date. I mean, then they’ll just say — and I think he’ll say with a lot of justice, it’s too late. And he said that even this week. One more surge, and then we have to look at a new reality. “

[equalizer]

Brooks: Even If Troop Surge Completely Fails, It Will Help McCain Politically

This is from Chris Matthews show Dec 2006. Chris and New York Times columnist David Brooks.

Very obvious from this little clip that troop surge had good or even great likelihood to work. To appease voters, the exec party went in with too few troops, the dems promised to bring troops home and didnt back surge. It took a moronic NYT America hater reporter to figure that out. And yet the stupid dems couldnt understand this 3rd grade logic??? Talk about obstinate. Powell’s two rules were so apt here: go in with overwhelming force (failed since Iraqi army essentially fired) and the Pottery Barn rule (you broke it, you fix it).

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/mccain-brooks/

“David, you think if Bush moves for more troops, following the Army’s advice, McCain’s on board, in fact, his biggest booster, that’s a doubling down for the bet for both those guys. What does it do to McCain’s future?

Mr. BROOKS: Well, I think people look at his conviction. I mean, if you look at every analysis of the war, every book that’s been written about it, it all comes back to three words: not enough troops. And John McCain has been saying that for three years, and the White House did not listen to him for three years, and people are going to remember that, I think.

MATTHEWS: But if it turns out that more troops don’t do the job, is he disproven.

Mr. BROOKS: Right. Well, not at this late date. I mean, then they’ll just say — and I think he’ll say with a lot of justice, it’s too late. And he said that even this week. One more surge, and then we have to look at a new reality. “

[equalizer]

what j said. if you have uncommon car, autotrader will bring in people from all over socal, sold car to someone from Palm Springs and for cheap car, UT. CL can bring the superlow bids and you exclude people who dont waste time on PC.

[equalizer]

what j said. if you have uncommon car, autotrader will bring in people from all over socal, sold car to someone from Palm Springs and for cheap car, UT. CL can bring the superlow bids and you exclude people who dont waste time on PC.

[equalizer]

what j said. if you have uncommon car, autotrader will bring in people from all over socal, sold car to someone from Palm Springs and for cheap car, UT. CL can bring the superlow bids and you exclude people who dont waste time on PC.

[equalizer]

what j said. if you have uncommon car, autotrader will bring in people from all over socal, sold car to someone from Palm Springs and for cheap car, UT. CL can bring the superlow bids and you exclude people who dont waste time on PC.

[equalizer]

what j said. if you have uncommon car, autotrader will bring in people from all over socal, sold car to someone from Palm Springs and for cheap car, UT. CL can bring the superlow bids and you exclude people who dont waste time on PC.

[equalizer]

here is older thread where we discussed banks. too bad the older list for weiss is gone

http://piggington.com/is_your_bank_safe

thanks to internet archive we have from July 07

http://web.archive.org/web/20070803184332/http://weissratings.com/HL_Bank.asp

netbank #1 weakest, it was gone in 6 months.

[equalizer]

here is older thread where we discussed banks. too bad the older list for weiss is gone

http://piggington.com/is_your_bank_safe

thanks to internet archive we have from July 07

http://web.archive.org/web/20070803184332/http://weissratings.com/HL_Bank.asp

netbank #1 weakest, it was gone in 6 months.

[equalizer]

here is older thread where we discussed banks. too bad the older list for weiss is gone

http://piggington.com/is_your_bank_safe

thanks to internet archive we have from July 07

http://web.archive.org/web/20070803184332/http://weissratings.com/HL_Bank.asp

netbank #1 weakest, it was gone in 6 months.

[equalizer]

here is older thread where we discussed banks. too bad the older list for weiss is gone

http://piggington.com/is_your_bank_safe

thanks to internet archive we have from July 07

http://web.archive.org/web/20070803184332/http://weissratings.com/HL_Bank.asp

netbank #1 weakest, it was gone in 6 months.

[Author]

Posts