Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2008 at 11:22 PM in reply to: OT: Good news at QC afterhours..Bad news. More people’s option in the money. #248209
equalizer
ParticipantArty,
Where was the Eli interview?
equalizer
ParticipantArty,
Where was the Eli interview?
equalizer
ParticipantArty,
Where was the Eli interview?
equalizer
ParticipantArty,
Where was the Eli interview?
equalizer
ParticipantArty,
Where was the Eli interview?
July 27, 2008 at 11:13 PM in reply to: Major event – BofA says no legal or moral obligation to contracts #248025equalizer
ParticipantSDR,
But why pay for common stock? Why not let stock fall to $1 and scoop in before FDIC takeover for bankside. Banks are not permitted to go into BK.
I think is a seminal event for bond managers. How can a bond manager trust bonds???
July 27, 2008 at 11:13 PM in reply to: Major event – BofA says no legal or moral obligation to contracts #248181equalizer
ParticipantSDR,
But why pay for common stock? Why not let stock fall to $1 and scoop in before FDIC takeover for bankside. Banks are not permitted to go into BK.
I think is a seminal event for bond managers. How can a bond manager trust bonds???
July 27, 2008 at 11:13 PM in reply to: Major event – BofA says no legal or moral obligation to contracts #248185equalizer
ParticipantSDR,
But why pay for common stock? Why not let stock fall to $1 and scoop in before FDIC takeover for bankside. Banks are not permitted to go into BK.
I think is a seminal event for bond managers. How can a bond manager trust bonds???
July 27, 2008 at 11:13 PM in reply to: Major event – BofA says no legal or moral obligation to contracts #248248equalizer
ParticipantSDR,
But why pay for common stock? Why not let stock fall to $1 and scoop in before FDIC takeover for bankside. Banks are not permitted to go into BK.
I think is a seminal event for bond managers. How can a bond manager trust bonds???
July 27, 2008 at 11:13 PM in reply to: Major event – BofA says no legal or moral obligation to contracts #248254equalizer
ParticipantSDR,
But why pay for common stock? Why not let stock fall to $1 and scoop in before FDIC takeover for bankside. Banks are not permitted to go into BK.
I think is a seminal event for bond managers. How can a bond manager trust bonds???
equalizer
ParticipantHere’s a very simple explanation. You pick door 1 and since there is a 1/3 chance of picking car, then there must be 2/3 chance that car is behind door 2 or 3. When Monty shows you door 2, he will never show you the car. Thus, he just spilled the beans, that is the odds of the car behind door 2 or 3 is still 2/3, but since he showed it is not door 2, the odds that it is just behine door #3 is 2/3.
Here’s the definitive explanation and simulation from nerds at UCSD math dept. Monty knows where the car is and that is why the odds from switching is 2/3. (He never open up the door with the car)
Simulation:
http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Monty/monty.html
explanation:
http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Monty/montybg.htmlequalizer
ParticipantHere’s a very simple explanation. You pick door 1 and since there is a 1/3 chance of picking car, then there must be 2/3 chance that car is behind door 2 or 3. When Monty shows you door 2, he will never show you the car. Thus, he just spilled the beans, that is the odds of the car behind door 2 or 3 is still 2/3, but since he showed it is not door 2, the odds that it is just behine door #3 is 2/3.
Here’s the definitive explanation and simulation from nerds at UCSD math dept. Monty knows where the car is and that is why the odds from switching is 2/3. (He never open up the door with the car)
Simulation:
http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Monty/monty.html
explanation:
http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Monty/montybg.htmlequalizer
ParticipantHere’s a very simple explanation. You pick door 1 and since there is a 1/3 chance of picking car, then there must be 2/3 chance that car is behind door 2 or 3. When Monty shows you door 2, he will never show you the car. Thus, he just spilled the beans, that is the odds of the car behind door 2 or 3 is still 2/3, but since he showed it is not door 2, the odds that it is just behine door #3 is 2/3.
Here’s the definitive explanation and simulation from nerds at UCSD math dept. Monty knows where the car is and that is why the odds from switching is 2/3. (He never open up the door with the car)
Simulation:
http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Monty/monty.html
explanation:
http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Monty/montybg.htmlequalizer
ParticipantHere’s a very simple explanation. You pick door 1 and since there is a 1/3 chance of picking car, then there must be 2/3 chance that car is behind door 2 or 3. When Monty shows you door 2, he will never show you the car. Thus, he just spilled the beans, that is the odds of the car behind door 2 or 3 is still 2/3, but since he showed it is not door 2, the odds that it is just behine door #3 is 2/3.
Here’s the definitive explanation and simulation from nerds at UCSD math dept. Monty knows where the car is and that is why the odds from switching is 2/3. (He never open up the door with the car)
Simulation:
http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Monty/monty.html
explanation:
http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Monty/montybg.html -
AuthorPosts
