Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]probably a short sale.[/quote]
I agree. Nobody writes a $200k check at escrow just for the pleasure of selling. They’d rather walk away.
Does the listing say short sale?[/quote]
Maybe they put 20%+ down which they lost – could be about $216000+
Lender loses nothing unless the price falls bellow $864000 minus 3 years of principal payments . This brings you very close to the sale price.
enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]probably a short sale.[/quote]
I agree. Nobody writes a $200k check at escrow just for the pleasure of selling. They’d rather walk away.
Does the listing say short sale?[/quote]
Maybe they put 20%+ down which they lost – could be about $216000+
Lender loses nothing unless the price falls bellow $864000 minus 3 years of principal payments . This brings you very close to the sale price.
enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=DataAgent][quote=ocrenter]jp, our favorite whipping boy, the fabulous “smashing stonebridge sanctuary” finally sold for $850k after 3 years of drama.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
That’s a huge total loss. I bet the seller is really happy to be done with that great adventure.[/quote]
Any idea if this was a (re)foreclosure? RE-REO?
enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=DataAgent][quote=ocrenter]jp, our favorite whipping boy, the fabulous “smashing stonebridge sanctuary” finally sold for $850k after 3 years of drama.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
That’s a huge total loss. I bet the seller is really happy to be done with that great adventure.[/quote]
Any idea if this was a (re)foreclosure? RE-REO?
enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=DataAgent][quote=ocrenter]jp, our favorite whipping boy, the fabulous “smashing stonebridge sanctuary” finally sold for $850k after 3 years of drama.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
That’s a huge total loss. I bet the seller is really happy to be done with that great adventure.[/quote]
Any idea if this was a (re)foreclosure? RE-REO?
enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=DataAgent][quote=ocrenter]jp, our favorite whipping boy, the fabulous “smashing stonebridge sanctuary” finally sold for $850k after 3 years of drama.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
That’s a huge total loss. I bet the seller is really happy to be done with that great adventure.[/quote]
Any idea if this was a (re)foreclosure? RE-REO?
enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=DataAgent][quote=ocrenter]jp, our favorite whipping boy, the fabulous “smashing stonebridge sanctuary” finally sold for $850k after 3 years of drama.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
That’s a huge total loss. I bet the seller is really happy to be done with that great adventure.[/quote]
Any idea if this was a (re)foreclosure? RE-REO?
enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantGold is a religion masquerading as an asset class.
http://www.businessinsider.com/gold-is-a-religion-2010-9?slop=1#slideshow-start#ixzz19SDDRDWh
enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantGold is a religion masquerading as an asset class.
http://www.businessinsider.com/gold-is-a-religion-2010-9?slop=1#slideshow-start#ixzz19SDDRDWh
enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantGold is a religion masquerading as an asset class.
http://www.businessinsider.com/gold-is-a-religion-2010-9?slop=1#slideshow-start#ixzz19SDDRDWh
enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantGold is a religion masquerading as an asset class.
http://www.businessinsider.com/gold-is-a-religion-2010-9?slop=1#slideshow-start#ixzz19SDDRDWh
enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantGold is a religion masquerading as an asset class.
http://www.businessinsider.com/gold-is-a-religion-2010-9?slop=1#slideshow-start#ixzz19SDDRDWh
enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantLet’s move forward.
Everyone agrees if taxes were 100%, reducing taxes will bring in more revenue and if taxes were 0%, increasing taxes will more revenue.
We have none of the 2 cases. Clearly there is an optimal level. What is that? 10%? 20%? 50%? 75%?
enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantLet’s move forward.
Everyone agrees if taxes were 100%, reducing taxes will bring in more revenue and if taxes were 0%, increasing taxes will more revenue.
We have none of the 2 cases. Clearly there is an optimal level. What is that? 10%? 20%? 50%? 75%?
-
AuthorPosts
