Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantLOL!!!
enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantLOL!!!
enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.
With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.
As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]
yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.
looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.
here’s the original from John Laing:
http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm
here’s the second try from California West:
http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1
and now the latest from City Venture:
http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php%5B/quote%5D
Did I read that right?
The second link Plan-1 shows ONLY TWO BEDROOMS in a 3000sf house?enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.
With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.
As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]
yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.
looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.
here’s the original from John Laing:
http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm
here’s the second try from California West:
http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1
and now the latest from City Venture:
http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php%5B/quote%5D
Did I read that right?
The second link Plan-1 shows ONLY TWO BEDROOMS in a 3000sf house?enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.
With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.
As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]
yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.
looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.
here’s the original from John Laing:
http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm
here’s the second try from California West:
http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1
and now the latest from City Venture:
http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php%5B/quote%5D
Did I read that right?
The second link Plan-1 shows ONLY TWO BEDROOMS in a 3000sf house?enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.
With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.
As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]
yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.
looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.
here’s the original from John Laing:
http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm
here’s the second try from California West:
http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1
and now the latest from City Venture:
http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php%5B/quote%5D
Did I read that right?
The second link Plan-1 shows ONLY TWO BEDROOMS in a 3000sf house?enron_by_the_sea
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sdcellar]These are the same ones California West was (and maybe still is) selling? They were selling them in the sevens and eights. Guess they didn’t/don’t care to re-up? Could be that these last lots are the worst, but I have no idea how true that might be. I’m pretty sure these didn’t work out as well for them as Monteluz and Andalusia in 4S.
With regard to City Ventures, the houses they built in Stonebridge weren’t up to same standards as those built by Warmington (and I think the lots may have been inferior as well), so they weren’t quite the price savings it would seem on paper. Still pretty good prices, though, for BAHs.
As you said, they were the same floor plan, but I think it diverged a bit from there. It will be the same in The Crosby, I’m sure.[/quote]
yup, these are the same lots. I have heard the City Venture homes in Stonebridge are not quite as upscale as the Warmington version.
looks like developers are doing quite a bit of musical chair. a bit weird to have one development pass thru three different developers though.
here’s the original from John Laing:
http://www.scheurerarchitects.com/projects/residential/attached/crosby/crosby.htm
here’s the second try from California West:
http://www.californiawestcommunities.com/community.php?ID=1
and now the latest from City Venture:
http://www.cityventures.com/rancho-santa-fe.php%5B/quote%5D
Did I read that right?
The second link Plan-1 shows ONLY TWO BEDROOMS in a 3000sf house?June 20, 2011 at 6:11 PM in reply to: It’s not all gloom and doom. “Silly” Valley values booming #705034enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantBubble 2.0 is forming in Silly Valley. Here is a funny YouTube link about it
June 20, 2011 at 6:11 PM in reply to: It’s not all gloom and doom. “Silly” Valley values booming #705129enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantBubble 2.0 is forming in Silly Valley. Here is a funny YouTube link about it
June 20, 2011 at 6:11 PM in reply to: It’s not all gloom and doom. “Silly” Valley values booming #705725enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantBubble 2.0 is forming in Silly Valley. Here is a funny YouTube link about it
June 20, 2011 at 6:11 PM in reply to: It’s not all gloom and doom. “Silly” Valley values booming #705876enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantBubble 2.0 is forming in Silly Valley. Here is a funny YouTube link about it
June 20, 2011 at 6:11 PM in reply to: It’s not all gloom and doom. “Silly” Valley values booming #706240enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantBubble 2.0 is forming in Silly Valley. Here is a funny YouTube link about it
enron_by_the_sea
Participantdon’t want to get into this..
enron_by_the_sea
Participantdon’t want to get into this..
-
AuthorPosts
