Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
DWCAP
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=XBoxBoy]
I’m no expert on the Tea Party, (nor would I categorize myself as a supporter) but my take runs something like this.The Tea Party started as grass roots thing. It’s agenda was pretty undefined, with lots of different people all with their own idea of what it was about.
[/quote]
Your take is in conflict with history. It did not begin as a grass roots thing. And it’s agenda was better defined at its origin than it is now.
Look into who funded and promoted the initial events. Despite their claims to the contrary, it is astroturf gone organic.[/quote]
Id like to see some links or other supporting evidence.
ParticipantIf this is as bad as it gets I think it should be counted as a huge victory. Most threads are RE, and those that are not are marked OT and easily avoided if desired.
ParticipantIf this is as bad as it gets I think it should be counted as a huge victory. Most threads are RE, and those that are not are marked OT and easily avoided if desired.
ParticipantIf this is as bad as it gets I think it should be counted as a huge victory. Most threads are RE, and those that are not are marked OT and easily avoided if desired.
ParticipantIf this is as bad as it gets I think it should be counted as a huge victory. Most threads are RE, and those that are not are marked OT and easily avoided if desired.
ParticipantIf this is as bad as it gets I think it should be counted as a huge victory. Most threads are RE, and those that are not are marked OT and easily avoided if desired.
ParticipantYou are confusing value with money. Alice doesnt have 3million, she has something that someone will give her 3million for. She has to sell the asset to get the money. If the bad earnings come in, and no one will give her 3 million anymore, then nothing happened to the total amount of money, her asset VALUE decreased.
Value isnt money. Value is how much money someone will give you for the object.
Or in the original example, there is 3 million dollars and 1 million $3 shares. If the bad earnings come in, then there is $3 million dollars and 1 million $2 shares. The values changed, not the money. If alice sells, then there is $3 million (2m alice, 1m bob) and 1 million shares (bob) worth $2 each. Nothing was destroyed, Alice prob feels poorer, bob may feel richer, but nothing except ownership has changed. There is still $3million and 1 million shares.
ParticipantYou are confusing value with money. Alice doesnt have 3million, she has something that someone will give her 3million for. She has to sell the asset to get the money. If the bad earnings come in, and no one will give her 3 million anymore, then nothing happened to the total amount of money, her asset VALUE decreased.
Value isnt money. Value is how much money someone will give you for the object.
Or in the original example, there is 3 million dollars and 1 million $3 shares. If the bad earnings come in, then there is $3 million dollars and 1 million $2 shares. The values changed, not the money. If alice sells, then there is $3 million (2m alice, 1m bob) and 1 million shares (bob) worth $2 each. Nothing was destroyed, Alice prob feels poorer, bob may feel richer, but nothing except ownership has changed. There is still $3million and 1 million shares.
ParticipantYou are confusing value with money. Alice doesnt have 3million, she has something that someone will give her 3million for. She has to sell the asset to get the money. If the bad earnings come in, and no one will give her 3 million anymore, then nothing happened to the total amount of money, her asset VALUE decreased.
Value isnt money. Value is how much money someone will give you for the object.
Or in the original example, there is 3 million dollars and 1 million $3 shares. If the bad earnings come in, then there is $3 million dollars and 1 million $2 shares. The values changed, not the money. If alice sells, then there is $3 million (2m alice, 1m bob) and 1 million shares (bob) worth $2 each. Nothing was destroyed, Alice prob feels poorer, bob may feel richer, but nothing except ownership has changed. There is still $3million and 1 million shares.
ParticipantYou are confusing value with money. Alice doesnt have 3million, she has something that someone will give her 3million for. She has to sell the asset to get the money. If the bad earnings come in, and no one will give her 3 million anymore, then nothing happened to the total amount of money, her asset VALUE decreased.
Value isnt money. Value is how much money someone will give you for the object.
Or in the original example, there is 3 million dollars and 1 million $3 shares. If the bad earnings come in, then there is $3 million dollars and 1 million $2 shares. The values changed, not the money. If alice sells, then there is $3 million (2m alice, 1m bob) and 1 million shares (bob) worth $2 each. Nothing was destroyed, Alice prob feels poorer, bob may feel richer, but nothing except ownership has changed. There is still $3million and 1 million shares.
ParticipantYou are confusing value with money. Alice doesnt have 3million, she has something that someone will give her 3million for. She has to sell the asset to get the money. If the bad earnings come in, and no one will give her 3 million anymore, then nothing happened to the total amount of money, her asset VALUE decreased.
Value isnt money. Value is how much money someone will give you for the object.
Or in the original example, there is 3 million dollars and 1 million $3 shares. If the bad earnings come in, then there is $3 million dollars and 1 million $2 shares. The values changed, not the money. If alice sells, then there is $3 million (2m alice, 1m bob) and 1 million shares (bob) worth $2 each. Nothing was destroyed, Alice prob feels poorer, bob may feel richer, but nothing except ownership has changed. There is still $3million and 1 million shares.
ParticipantYou dont think it has anything to do with the stock market? I do. Stocks were on their way up up and away three months ago. They were below 10k again, and peoples expecations of the future were made just alittle more realistic. No?
ParticipantYou dont think it has anything to do with the stock market? I do. Stocks were on their way up up and away three months ago. They were below 10k again, and peoples expecations of the future were made just alittle more realistic. No?
ParticipantYou dont think it has anything to do with the stock market? I do. Stocks were on their way up up and away three months ago. They were below 10k again, and peoples expecations of the future were made just alittle more realistic. No?
-
AuthorPosts
