Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dougie944Participant
I love having my house paid off. You will be able to save $2500/mth in not having a mortgage, plus gain about $2500/$3000 month in rent while you are not there. That is $60K/yr you will be able to save, plus whatever else you save with the higher paying job you took. You will still be able to deduct expenses, taxes, and depreciation against your rental income.
In the early 90s, the Japanese probably thought their interest rates would rise also. They’re still waiting. We are in a deflationary cycle as credit contracts around the world.
Take the security and move on. I still have money in a savings account that I am looking to invest. It is, in my opinion, a difficult and frustrating time in history to invest money and be sure you are doing the right thing. If you need that money in the future, you can always mortgage the house again. It isn’t as if you have thrown it in a trash can. With $400k down, you have already assumed all the downside risk if prices keep falling.
Dougie944ParticipantI love having my house paid off. You will be able to save $2500/mth in not having a mortgage, plus gain about $2500/$3000 month in rent while you are not there. That is $60K/yr you will be able to save, plus whatever else you save with the higher paying job you took. You will still be able to deduct expenses, taxes, and depreciation against your rental income.
In the early 90s, the Japanese probably thought their interest rates would rise also. They’re still waiting. We are in a deflationary cycle as credit contracts around the world.
Take the security and move on. I still have money in a savings account that I am looking to invest. It is, in my opinion, a difficult and frustrating time in history to invest money and be sure you are doing the right thing. If you need that money in the future, you can always mortgage the house again. It isn’t as if you have thrown it in a trash can. With $400k down, you have already assumed all the downside risk if prices keep falling.
Dougie944ParticipantI love having my house paid off. You will be able to save $2500/mth in not having a mortgage, plus gain about $2500/$3000 month in rent while you are not there. That is $60K/yr you will be able to save, plus whatever else you save with the higher paying job you took. You will still be able to deduct expenses, taxes, and depreciation against your rental income.
In the early 90s, the Japanese probably thought their interest rates would rise also. They’re still waiting. We are in a deflationary cycle as credit contracts around the world.
Take the security and move on. I still have money in a savings account that I am looking to invest. It is, in my opinion, a difficult and frustrating time in history to invest money and be sure you are doing the right thing. If you need that money in the future, you can always mortgage the house again. It isn’t as if you have thrown it in a trash can. With $400k down, you have already assumed all the downside risk if prices keep falling.
Dougie944ParticipantAustralia is in the final stages of a massive housing bubble. Lending qualifications have already been reduced. Inventory is building and price drops are imminent. The following link gives some facts and insight into the problems.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/02/pool-of-greater-housing-fools-in.html
I would enjoy renting.
Dougie944ParticipantAustralia is in the final stages of a massive housing bubble. Lending qualifications have already been reduced. Inventory is building and price drops are imminent. The following link gives some facts and insight into the problems.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/02/pool-of-greater-housing-fools-in.html
I would enjoy renting.
Dougie944ParticipantAustralia is in the final stages of a massive housing bubble. Lending qualifications have already been reduced. Inventory is building and price drops are imminent. The following link gives some facts and insight into the problems.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/02/pool-of-greater-housing-fools-in.html
I would enjoy renting.
Dougie944ParticipantAustralia is in the final stages of a massive housing bubble. Lending qualifications have already been reduced. Inventory is building and price drops are imminent. The following link gives some facts and insight into the problems.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/02/pool-of-greater-housing-fools-in.html
I would enjoy renting.
Dougie944ParticipantAustralia is in the final stages of a massive housing bubble. Lending qualifications have already been reduced. Inventory is building and price drops are imminent. The following link gives some facts and insight into the problems.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/02/pool-of-greater-housing-fools-in.html
I would enjoy renting.
Dougie944ParticipantDon’t take this the wrong way……but you are hopelessly lost. They have peed on your head, told you it was raining, and you believed them. Best of luck to you.
Dougie944ParticipantDon’t take this the wrong way……but you are hopelessly lost. They have peed on your head, told you it was raining, and you believed them. Best of luck to you.
Dougie944ParticipantDon’t take this the wrong way……but you are hopelessly lost. They have peed on your head, told you it was raining, and you believed them. Best of luck to you.
Dougie944ParticipantDon’t take this the wrong way……but you are hopelessly lost. They have peed on your head, told you it was raining, and you believed them. Best of luck to you.
Dougie944ParticipantDon’t take this the wrong way……but you are hopelessly lost. They have peed on your head, told you it was raining, and you believed them. Best of luck to you.
Dougie944ParticipantBrian, this is your problem. You base all your arguments off this:
“As Geithner said”
Geithner stating things does not make them facts.
What about this option?
How about a government controlled bankruptcy where the bondholders lose everything since that is what you deserve when your bonds are attached to a bankrupt company?The bank shareholders would lose everything because that is what happens in a bankruptcy.
The current banks would probably emerge from the controlled bankruptcy with new management and boards as we should have no confidence In those people. If new banks needed to form to take their place, there are mechanisms for raising capital through IPOs.
The books would now be cleaner, the right people would have lost their money, and we would have different management. If the gov’t had to kick in extra money to help smooth it out, then so be it.
The same people that are saying this couldn’t have worked, also said the same thing about the car companies going through bankruptcy. They were wrong.
Paulson and company did it their way because it saved the bondholders/shareholders (extremely wealthy people) from losing their money. These people were making the decisions for their benefit at the expense of the other 99.9% of the country. Paulson was one of those rich people. So were his friends. He saved himself and his friends.
Now Geithner has the audacity to spin it like he saved the world and the worst part is that some people are believing him.
Brian, you never addressed the fact that Geithner oversaw the lending that started the meltdown.
-
AuthorPosts