[Djshakes]

[quote=zk][quote=Djshakes]I love it. Lefties run the state into the hole and then when criticized bark “why don’t you tell us how to fix it then, huh” as if it is our problem. They will never admit “yeah…our policies f’d stuff up”.

I’m sorry that people can’t come up with a quick response as to how to fix this colossal problem you have got us into over the years. You have dug the hole so deep with limited options out it is pretty much a trick question. I applaud your bailout mentality and unwillingness to accept responsibility though. However, years of liberal policies and government have gotten us into this situation……live with it. The state can burn for all I care. Maybe others would wake up. I’m willing to have it be a sacrificial lamb. [/quote]

[quote=Djshakes]Lefties run the state into the hole…[/quote]

You assume I’m a “lefty.” You’re wrong.

[quote=Djshakes]and then when criticized…[/quote]

I wasn’t criticized by anyone, but if there’s something you’d like to say, I’m listening.

[quote=Djshakes]…bark…[/quote]

I’m not barking, I’m trying, quite unsuccessfully (except for flu), to get an exchange of ideas started.

[quote=Djshakes]…as if it is our problem.[/quote]

If you live in California, it is your problem.

[quote=Djshakes]They will never admit ‘yeah…our policies f’d stuff up’. [/quote]

That I agree with. Except you left something out. It’s not just the left. Neither side will step up and say that. The right blames the state of the economy on Obama, when it was Bush and the Republican congress who (in large part) destroyed it. Both sides are incapable of accepting blame.

At this point, however, blame is irrelevant. There’s a huge problem that needs to be fixed.

[quote=Djshakes]I’m sorry that people can’t come up with a quick response as to how to fix this colossal problem…[/quote]

My point is if they have no ideas on how to fix it, they shouldn’t be blaming our first fiscally responsible governor in decades for actually trying to do something that will actually fix the budget problem. Bitch, bitch, bitch, but no ideas. Lame.

[quote=Djshakes]…you have got us into over the years.[/quote]

Who’s “you”?

[quote=Djshakes]You have dug the hole so deep with limited options out it is pretty much a trick question.[/quote]

A trick question? Really? So are you saying we’ve given Jerry Brown a trick question and there’s nothing he can do?

[quote=Djshakes]I applaud your bailout mentality…[/quote]

My what!? Anyone can see that you made that up out of thin air. You should avoid doing such things if you want any credibility.

[quote=Djshakes]However, years of liberal policies and government have gotten us into this situation…[/quote]

I think that’s mostly true. I also think fiscal irresponsibility is rampant on both sides of the aisle.

[quote=Djshakes]…live with it[/quote]

Why would I do that? Why would I not want to see it fixed?

[quote=Djshakes]The state can burn for all I care.[/quote]

I’d guess that you don’t mean that, in which case I can’t see why you’d say it. (If you do mean it, then you desperately need professional psychiatric care).

[quote=Djshakes]Maybe others would wake up.[/quote]

Doubtful.

[quote=Djshakes]I’m willing to have it be a sacrificial lamb.[/quote]

Why?[/quote]

Let me rant once and a while damn it. It makes me feel manly. I’ll kiss and make up with you in a bit…sexy.

[Djshakes]

[quote=zk][quote=Djshakes]I love it. Lefties run the state into the hole and then when criticized bark “why don’t you tell us how to fix it then, huh” as if it is our problem. They will never admit “yeah…our policies f’d stuff up”.

I’m sorry that people can’t come up with a quick response as to how to fix this colossal problem you have got us into over the years. You have dug the hole so deep with limited options out it is pretty much a trick question. I applaud your bailout mentality and unwillingness to accept responsibility though. However, years of liberal policies and government have gotten us into this situation……live with it. The state can burn for all I care. Maybe others would wake up. I’m willing to have it be a sacrificial lamb. [/quote]

[quote=Djshakes]Lefties run the state into the hole…[/quote]

You assume I’m a “lefty.” You’re wrong.

[quote=Djshakes]and then when criticized…[/quote]

I wasn’t criticized by anyone, but if there’s something you’d like to say, I’m listening.

[quote=Djshakes]…bark…[/quote]

I’m not barking, I’m trying, quite unsuccessfully (except for flu), to get an exchange of ideas started.

[quote=Djshakes]…as if it is our problem.[/quote]

If you live in California, it is your problem.

[quote=Djshakes]They will never admit ‘yeah…our policies f’d stuff up’. [/quote]

That I agree with. Except you left something out. It’s not just the left. Neither side will step up and say that. The right blames the state of the economy on Obama, when it was Bush and the Republican congress who (in large part) destroyed it. Both sides are incapable of accepting blame.

At this point, however, blame is irrelevant. There’s a huge problem that needs to be fixed.

[quote=Djshakes]I’m sorry that people can’t come up with a quick response as to how to fix this colossal problem…[/quote]

My point is if they have no ideas on how to fix it, they shouldn’t be blaming our first fiscally responsible governor in decades for actually trying to do something that will actually fix the budget problem. Bitch, bitch, bitch, but no ideas. Lame.

[quote=Djshakes]…you have got us into over the years.[/quote]

Who’s “you”?

[quote=Djshakes]You have dug the hole so deep with limited options out it is pretty much a trick question.[/quote]

A trick question? Really? So are you saying we’ve given Jerry Brown a trick question and there’s nothing he can do?

[quote=Djshakes]I applaud your bailout mentality…[/quote]

My what!? Anyone can see that you made that up out of thin air. You should avoid doing such things if you want any credibility.

[quote=Djshakes]However, years of liberal policies and government have gotten us into this situation…[/quote]

I think that’s mostly true. I also think fiscal irresponsibility is rampant on both sides of the aisle.

[quote=Djshakes]…live with it[/quote]

Why would I do that? Why would I not want to see it fixed?

[quote=Djshakes]The state can burn for all I care.[/quote]

I’d guess that you don’t mean that, in which case I can’t see why you’d say it. (If you do mean it, then you desperately need professional psychiatric care).

[quote=Djshakes]Maybe others would wake up.[/quote]

Doubtful.

[quote=Djshakes]I’m willing to have it be a sacrificial lamb.[/quote]

Why?[/quote]

Let me rant once and a while damn it. It makes me feel manly. I’ll kiss and make up with you in a bit…sexy.

[Djshakes]

[quote=bubba99]
IMHO the tea party is a direct result of the exceptional abilty of the reps ability to stay on short tag line messages.[/quote]

The tea party is a direct result of the Republican party abandoning traditional conservative ideals and to provide an alternative to the failed party. Even Chris Matthews admits that.

[Djshakes]

[quote=bubba99]
IMHO the tea party is a direct result of the exceptional abilty of the reps ability to stay on short tag line messages.[/quote]

The tea party is a direct result of the Republican party abandoning traditional conservative ideals and to provide an alternative to the failed party. Even Chris Matthews admits that.

[Djshakes]

[quote=bubba99]
IMHO the tea party is a direct result of the exceptional abilty of the reps ability to stay on short tag line messages.[/quote]

The tea party is a direct result of the Republican party abandoning traditional conservative ideals and to provide an alternative to the failed party. Even Chris Matthews admits that.

[Djshakes]

[quote=bubba99]
IMHO the tea party is a direct result of the exceptional abilty of the reps ability to stay on short tag line messages.[/quote]

The tea party is a direct result of the Republican party abandoning traditional conservative ideals and to provide an alternative to the failed party. Even Chris Matthews admits that.

[Djshakes]

[quote=bubba99]
IMHO the tea party is a direct result of the exceptional abilty of the reps ability to stay on short tag line messages.[/quote]

The tea party is a direct result of the Republican party abandoning traditional conservative ideals and to provide an alternative to the failed party. Even Chris Matthews admits that.

[Djshakes]

bubba…you should shut up if you don’t know what you are talking about.

FY10 Scripps expenses per GL:

Professional Srvcs to SCMG (Scripps Clinical Medical Group) – $161,513,071

Depreciation, Amoritization, interst fee & expense and Bond interest series 2008 – $18,580,177

I don’t even want to waste time addressing the rest of the fail in the previous responses.

[Djshakes]

bubba…you should shut up if you don’t know what you are talking about.

FY10 Scripps expenses per GL:

Professional Srvcs to SCMG (Scripps Clinical Medical Group) – $161,513,071

Depreciation, Amoritization, interst fee & expense and Bond interest series 2008 – $18,580,177

I don’t even want to waste time addressing the rest of the fail in the previous responses.

[Djshakes]

bubba…you should shut up if you don’t know what you are talking about.

FY10 Scripps expenses per GL:

Professional Srvcs to SCMG (Scripps Clinical Medical Group) – $161,513,071

Depreciation, Amoritization, interst fee & expense and Bond interest series 2008 – $18,580,177

I don’t even want to waste time addressing the rest of the fail in the previous responses.

[Djshakes]

bubba…you should shut up if you don’t know what you are talking about.

FY10 Scripps expenses per GL:

Professional Srvcs to SCMG (Scripps Clinical Medical Group) – $161,513,071

Depreciation, Amoritization, interst fee & expense and Bond interest series 2008 – $18,580,177

I don’t even want to waste time addressing the rest of the fail in the previous responses.

[Djshakes]

bubba…you should shut up if you don’t know what you are talking about.

FY10 Scripps expenses per GL:

Professional Srvcs to SCMG (Scripps Clinical Medical Group) – $161,513,071

Depreciation, Amoritization, interst fee & expense and Bond interest series 2008 – $18,580,177

I don’t even want to waste time addressing the rest of the fail in the previous responses.

[Djshakes]

[quote=CA renter]
Additionally, the taxpayers pay for the majority of our medical research, either through the NIH or public universities or grants, etc. Why should the private industry reap the rewards from the research (especially the foundational R&D) that the taxpayers have paid for?[/quote]

While NIH is government funded, not many institutions have access to this money. A majority of research is paid for my pharma companies through clinical trials and philanthropic funds distributed through grants.

– Previous accountant for the research department of Scripps

[Djshakes]

[quote=CA renter]
Additionally, the taxpayers pay for the majority of our medical research, either through the NIH or public universities or grants, etc. Why should the private industry reap the rewards from the research (especially the foundational R&D) that the taxpayers have paid for?[/quote]

While NIH is government funded, not many institutions have access to this money. A majority of research is paid for my pharma companies through clinical trials and philanthropic funds distributed through grants.

– Previous accountant for the research department of Scripps

[Djshakes]

[quote=CA renter]
Additionally, the taxpayers pay for the majority of our medical research, either through the NIH or public universities or grants, etc. Why should the private industry reap the rewards from the research (especially the foundational R&D) that the taxpayers have paid for?[/quote]

While NIH is government funded, not many institutions have access to this money. A majority of research is paid for my pharma companies through clinical trials and philanthropic funds distributed through grants.

– Previous accountant for the research department of Scripps

[Author]

Posts