Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Diego Mamani
ParticipantThe wrap itself is all starch and full of calories. The BBQ sauce is loaded with sugar (that’s why is so “tasty”). Caesar salad dressing is like mayo: mostly fat.
The chicken part was light, but the wrap, the sauce, the salad dressing are all JUNK!
I don’t even eat animals any more, except for the ocassional fish.
ParticipantThe wrap itself is all starch and full of calories. The BBQ sauce is loaded with sugar (that’s why is so “tasty”). Caesar salad dressing is like mayo: mostly fat.
The chicken part was light, but the wrap, the sauce, the salad dressing are all JUNK!
I don’t even eat animals any more, except for the ocassional fish.
ParticipantThe wrap itself is all starch and full of calories. The BBQ sauce is loaded with sugar (that’s why is so “tasty”). Caesar salad dressing is like mayo: mostly fat.
The chicken part was light, but the wrap, the sauce, the salad dressing are all JUNK!
I don’t even eat animals any more, except for the ocassional fish.
ParticipantThe wrap itself is all starch and full of calories. The BBQ sauce is loaded with sugar (that’s why is so “tasty”). Caesar salad dressing is like mayo: mostly fat.
The chicken part was light, but the wrap, the sauce, the salad dressing are all JUNK!
I don’t even eat animals any more, except for the ocassional fish.
Participant[quote=DWCAP]Considering China’s current track record I wouldnt be too worried about China taking over everything like they seem to be planning. Their food sucks, their drugs suck, their toys suck, their high tech sucks or is just a ripoff that would be sued so fast it wouldnt be funny. China is good at making lots of cheap stuff that is disposable. Itll break in a year, but who cares it was dirt cheap and served its purpose. This will not bode will for a large purchase like a car, not matter how ambishious their buisness men are.[/quote]
What you wrote was also true of Japan and Japanese products in the 1950s and 1960s. We know how that turned out in the end…
Participant[quote=DWCAP]Considering China’s current track record I wouldnt be too worried about China taking over everything like they seem to be planning. Their food sucks, their drugs suck, their toys suck, their high tech sucks or is just a ripoff that would be sued so fast it wouldnt be funny. China is good at making lots of cheap stuff that is disposable. Itll break in a year, but who cares it was dirt cheap and served its purpose. This will not bode will for a large purchase like a car, not matter how ambishious their buisness men are.[/quote]
What you wrote was also true of Japan and Japanese products in the 1950s and 1960s. We know how that turned out in the end…
Participant[quote=DWCAP]Considering China’s current track record I wouldnt be too worried about China taking over everything like they seem to be planning. Their food sucks, their drugs suck, their toys suck, their high tech sucks or is just a ripoff that would be sued so fast it wouldnt be funny. China is good at making lots of cheap stuff that is disposable. Itll break in a year, but who cares it was dirt cheap and served its purpose. This will not bode will for a large purchase like a car, not matter how ambishious their buisness men are.[/quote]
What you wrote was also true of Japan and Japanese products in the 1950s and 1960s. We know how that turned out in the end…
Participant[quote=DWCAP]Considering China’s current track record I wouldnt be too worried about China taking over everything like they seem to be planning. Their food sucks, their drugs suck, their toys suck, their high tech sucks or is just a ripoff that would be sued so fast it wouldnt be funny. China is good at making lots of cheap stuff that is disposable. Itll break in a year, but who cares it was dirt cheap and served its purpose. This will not bode will for a large purchase like a car, not matter how ambishious their buisness men are.[/quote]
What you wrote was also true of Japan and Japanese products in the 1950s and 1960s. We know how that turned out in the end…
Participant[quote=DWCAP]Considering China’s current track record I wouldnt be too worried about China taking over everything like they seem to be planning. Their food sucks, their drugs suck, their toys suck, their high tech sucks or is just a ripoff that would be sued so fast it wouldnt be funny. China is good at making lots of cheap stuff that is disposable. Itll break in a year, but who cares it was dirt cheap and served its purpose. This will not bode will for a large purchase like a car, not matter how ambishious their buisness men are.[/quote]
What you wrote was also true of Japan and Japanese products in the 1950s and 1960s. We know how that turned out in the end…
Participant[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
Participant[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
Participant[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
Participant[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
Participant[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
-
AuthorPosts
