Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Deal Hunter
ParticipantActually there are only 2 kinds of people in the world – The Indebted and The Debt-free.
ParticipantActually there are only 2 kinds of people in the world – The Indebted and The Debt-free.
ParticipantActually there are only 2 kinds of people in the world – The Indebted and The Debt-free.
ParticipantActually there are only 2 kinds of people in the world – The Indebted and The Debt-free.
ParticipantActually there are only 2 kinds of people in the world – The Indebted and The Debt-free.
Participantdrunkle, you’re right. I wouldn’t pay more than $2 per share for the IB’s that took on those derivatives. Raising the interest rate, would make their building in Manhattan more valuable, but that’s it.
It’s the battle for paper assets that the Fed is trying to win. Of course, in the process they’re turning the US Dollar into Charmin.
Participantdrunkle, you’re right. I wouldn’t pay more than $2 per share for the IB’s that took on those derivatives. Raising the interest rate, would make their building in Manhattan more valuable, but that’s it.
It’s the battle for paper assets that the Fed is trying to win. Of course, in the process they’re turning the US Dollar into Charmin.
Participantdrunkle, you’re right. I wouldn’t pay more than $2 per share for the IB’s that took on those derivatives. Raising the interest rate, would make their building in Manhattan more valuable, but that’s it.
It’s the battle for paper assets that the Fed is trying to win. Of course, in the process they’re turning the US Dollar into Charmin.
Participantdrunkle, you’re right. I wouldn’t pay more than $2 per share for the IB’s that took on those derivatives. Raising the interest rate, would make their building in Manhattan more valuable, but that’s it.
It’s the battle for paper assets that the Fed is trying to win. Of course, in the process they’re turning the US Dollar into Charmin.
Participantdrunkle, you’re right. I wouldn’t pay more than $2 per share for the IB’s that took on those derivatives. Raising the interest rate, would make their building in Manhattan more valuable, but that’s it.
It’s the battle for paper assets that the Fed is trying to win. Of course, in the process they’re turning the US Dollar into Charmin.
March 17, 2008 at 6:50 PM in reply to: Remember the Cal Poly Professor who wrote a paper refuting the housing bubble? #171962ParticipantPhDs have no relevance in the markets. Remember the “geniuses” at LTCM? They were from Harvard and MIT. Then there’s “professor” Bernanke.
March 17, 2008 at 6:50 PM in reply to: Remember the Cal Poly Professor who wrote a paper refuting the housing bubble? #172294ParticipantPhDs have no relevance in the markets. Remember the “geniuses” at LTCM? They were from Harvard and MIT. Then there’s “professor” Bernanke.
March 17, 2008 at 6:50 PM in reply to: Remember the Cal Poly Professor who wrote a paper refuting the housing bubble? #172300ParticipantPhDs have no relevance in the markets. Remember the “geniuses” at LTCM? They were from Harvard and MIT. Then there’s “professor” Bernanke.
March 17, 2008 at 6:50 PM in reply to: Remember the Cal Poly Professor who wrote a paper refuting the housing bubble? #172321ParticipantPhDs have no relevance in the markets. Remember the “geniuses” at LTCM? They were from Harvard and MIT. Then there’s “professor” Bernanke.
-
AuthorPosts
