Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
dbapig
ParticipantStarting in 1750, whites in the 13 colonies chose to separate from UK with this chant.
“No taxation without representation”
With this new ruling here’s the new chant.
“Real Representation only with $$$$$”
Awesome, it’s getting better and better.
ParticipantStarting in 1750, whites in the 13 colonies chose to separate from UK with this chant.
“No taxation without representation”
With this new ruling here’s the new chant.
“Real Representation only with $$$$$”
Awesome, it’s getting better and better.
ParticipantStarting in 1750, whites in the 13 colonies chose to separate from UK with this chant.
“No taxation without representation”
With this new ruling here’s the new chant.
“Real Representation only with $$$$$”
Awesome, it’s getting better and better.
ParticipantStarting in 1750, whites in the 13 colonies chose to separate from UK with this chant.
“No taxation without representation”
With this new ruling here’s the new chant.
“Real Representation only with $$$$$”
Awesome, it’s getting better and better.
Participant[quote=pri_dk]I’m pretty sure this decision is universally unpopular with members of both parties (with the exception of incumbent politicians, CEOs, union leaders, etc.)
It offers nothing to Joe public, regardless of his political viewpoint.
Perhaps a Constitutional amendment is in order?
It’s been a while since we had one…[/quote]
I’m for it. It’s such an obvious concept, a human being =! corporation. And Free Speech is for human beings.
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.
Participant[quote=pri_dk]I’m pretty sure this decision is universally unpopular with members of both parties (with the exception of incumbent politicians, CEOs, union leaders, etc.)
It offers nothing to Joe public, regardless of his political viewpoint.
Perhaps a Constitutional amendment is in order?
It’s been a while since we had one…[/quote]
I’m for it. It’s such an obvious concept, a human being =! corporation. And Free Speech is for human beings.
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.
Participant[quote=pri_dk]I’m pretty sure this decision is universally unpopular with members of both parties (with the exception of incumbent politicians, CEOs, union leaders, etc.)
It offers nothing to Joe public, regardless of his political viewpoint.
Perhaps a Constitutional amendment is in order?
It’s been a while since we had one…[/quote]
I’m for it. It’s such an obvious concept, a human being =! corporation. And Free Speech is for human beings.
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.
Participant[quote=pri_dk]I’m pretty sure this decision is universally unpopular with members of both parties (with the exception of incumbent politicians, CEOs, union leaders, etc.)
It offers nothing to Joe public, regardless of his political viewpoint.
Perhaps a Constitutional amendment is in order?
It’s been a while since we had one…[/quote]
I’m for it. It’s such an obvious concept, a human being =! corporation. And Free Speech is for human beings.
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.
Participant[quote=pri_dk]I’m pretty sure this decision is universally unpopular with members of both parties (with the exception of incumbent politicians, CEOs, union leaders, etc.)
It offers nothing to Joe public, regardless of his political viewpoint.
Perhaps a Constitutional amendment is in order?
It’s been a while since we had one…[/quote]
I’m for it. It’s such an obvious concept, a human being =! corporation. And Free Speech is for human beings.
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=Casca][quote=svelte][quote=Casca]Detroit is the posterchild for what the Dems/left want to do to America. [/quote]
San Francisco County has 273K registered Democrats and 66K registered Republicans.
The main street of SF looks nothing like the main street of Detroit.[/quote]
Have you ever made a trip across the bay Svelte? Drive down Fruitvale, preferably after dark.[/quote]
Last I heard, SF County does not extend across the bay…[/quote]
What? No response by geographically challenged (aka Casca) ? 🙂
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=Casca][quote=svelte][quote=Casca]Detroit is the posterchild for what the Dems/left want to do to America. [/quote]
San Francisco County has 273K registered Democrats and 66K registered Republicans.
The main street of SF looks nothing like the main street of Detroit.[/quote]
Have you ever made a trip across the bay Svelte? Drive down Fruitvale, preferably after dark.[/quote]
Last I heard, SF County does not extend across the bay…[/quote]
What? No response by geographically challenged (aka Casca) ? 🙂
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=Casca][quote=svelte][quote=Casca]Detroit is the posterchild for what the Dems/left want to do to America. [/quote]
San Francisco County has 273K registered Democrats and 66K registered Republicans.
The main street of SF looks nothing like the main street of Detroit.[/quote]
Have you ever made a trip across the bay Svelte? Drive down Fruitvale, preferably after dark.[/quote]
Last I heard, SF County does not extend across the bay…[/quote]
What? No response by geographically challenged (aka Casca) ? 🙂
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=Casca][quote=svelte][quote=Casca]Detroit is the posterchild for what the Dems/left want to do to America. [/quote]
San Francisco County has 273K registered Democrats and 66K registered Republicans.
The main street of SF looks nothing like the main street of Detroit.[/quote]
Have you ever made a trip across the bay Svelte? Drive down Fruitvale, preferably after dark.[/quote]
Last I heard, SF County does not extend across the bay…[/quote]
What? No response by geographically challenged (aka Casca) ? 🙂
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=Casca][quote=svelte][quote=Casca]Detroit is the posterchild for what the Dems/left want to do to America. [/quote]
San Francisco County has 273K registered Democrats and 66K registered Republicans.
The main street of SF looks nothing like the main street of Detroit.[/quote]
Have you ever made a trip across the bay Svelte? Drive down Fruitvale, preferably after dark.[/quote]
Last I heard, SF County does not extend across the bay…[/quote]
What? No response by geographically challenged (aka Casca) ? 🙂
-
AuthorPosts
