Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 30, 2011 at 1:19 PM in reply to: OT: Anybody had any success in getting rid of cigarrette smell from a home? #681849March 30, 2011 at 1:19 PM in reply to: OT: Anybody had any success in getting rid of cigarrette smell from a home? #681903dbapigParticipant
Don’t mean to hijack the thread but at least the previous residents were normal people.
I never understood why some smokers would come out of their home to patio/yard to smoke and let all the smoke escape. I always wondered wouldn’t smoking in enclosed place (own house/apt/car) be better as it will allow them to get more enjoyment out of their expensive cigarettes….
March 30, 2011 at 1:19 PM in reply to: OT: Anybody had any success in getting rid of cigarrette smell from a home? #682525dbapigParticipantDon’t mean to hijack the thread but at least the previous residents were normal people.
I never understood why some smokers would come out of their home to patio/yard to smoke and let all the smoke escape. I always wondered wouldn’t smoking in enclosed place (own house/apt/car) be better as it will allow them to get more enjoyment out of their expensive cigarettes….
March 30, 2011 at 1:19 PM in reply to: OT: Anybody had any success in getting rid of cigarrette smell from a home? #682664dbapigParticipantDon’t mean to hijack the thread but at least the previous residents were normal people.
I never understood why some smokers would come out of their home to patio/yard to smoke and let all the smoke escape. I always wondered wouldn’t smoking in enclosed place (own house/apt/car) be better as it will allow them to get more enjoyment out of their expensive cigarettes….
March 30, 2011 at 1:19 PM in reply to: OT: Anybody had any success in getting rid of cigarrette smell from a home? #683020dbapigParticipantDon’t mean to hijack the thread but at least the previous residents were normal people.
I never understood why some smokers would come out of their home to patio/yard to smoke and let all the smoke escape. I always wondered wouldn’t smoking in enclosed place (own house/apt/car) be better as it will allow them to get more enjoyment out of their expensive cigarettes….
March 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT: how disruptive is for kids to change school districts? #679302dbapigParticipantBased on my personal experience, some kids have problem with changing school no matter what the age is…
March 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT: how disruptive is for kids to change school districts? #679358dbapigParticipantBased on my personal experience, some kids have problem with changing school no matter what the age is…
March 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT: how disruptive is for kids to change school districts? #679968dbapigParticipantBased on my personal experience, some kids have problem with changing school no matter what the age is…
March 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT: how disruptive is for kids to change school districts? #680106dbapigParticipantBased on my personal experience, some kids have problem with changing school no matter what the age is…
March 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT: how disruptive is for kids to change school districts? #680457dbapigParticipantBased on my personal experience, some kids have problem with changing school no matter what the age is…
dbapigParticipant[quote=CA renter][quote=gandalf][quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.[/quote]
Remember how the Tea Party originally started out as being against bailing out bankers and FBs? Then, it quietly morphed into being anti-union, anti-healthcare, and anti-taxes. I don’t think that was an accident.[/quote]
I agree. I have to say though the handlers behind them are pretty brilliant. The economic crisis was largely caused by wall street and reckless risk taking. But now somehow the blame falls on public employee unions. Really???
dbapigParticipant[quote=CA renter][quote=gandalf][quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.[/quote]
Remember how the Tea Party originally started out as being against bailing out bankers and FBs? Then, it quietly morphed into being anti-union, anti-healthcare, and anti-taxes. I don’t think that was an accident.[/quote]
I agree. I have to say though the handlers behind them are pretty brilliant. The economic crisis was largely caused by wall street and reckless risk taking. But now somehow the blame falls on public employee unions. Really???
dbapigParticipant[quote=CA renter][quote=gandalf][quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.[/quote]
Remember how the Tea Party originally started out as being against bailing out bankers and FBs? Then, it quietly morphed into being anti-union, anti-healthcare, and anti-taxes. I don’t think that was an accident.[/quote]
I agree. I have to say though the handlers behind them are pretty brilliant. The economic crisis was largely caused by wall street and reckless risk taking. But now somehow the blame falls on public employee unions. Really???
dbapigParticipant[quote=CA renter][quote=gandalf][quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.[/quote]
Remember how the Tea Party originally started out as being against bailing out bankers and FBs? Then, it quietly morphed into being anti-union, anti-healthcare, and anti-taxes. I don’t think that was an accident.[/quote]
I agree. I have to say though the handlers behind them are pretty brilliant. The economic crisis was largely caused by wall street and reckless risk taking. But now somehow the blame falls on public employee unions. Really???
dbapigParticipant[quote=CA renter][quote=gandalf][quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.[/quote]
Remember how the Tea Party originally started out as being against bailing out bankers and FBs? Then, it quietly morphed into being anti-union, anti-healthcare, and anti-taxes. I don’t think that was an accident.[/quote]
I agree. I have to say though the handlers behind them are pretty brilliant. The economic crisis was largely caused by wall street and reckless risk taking. But now somehow the blame falls on public employee unions. Really???
-
AuthorPosts