Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Daniel
ParticipantUnreal indeed. I’ve seen stupid things published before, but this one takes the cake. Doesn’t that paper have an editor?
ParticipantUnreal indeed. I’ve seen stupid things published before, but this one takes the cake. Doesn’t that paper have an editor?
ParticipantUnreal indeed. I’ve seen stupid things published before, but this one takes the cake. Doesn’t that paper have an editor?
ParticipantAs Homer Simpson once said, you can get off jury duty by claiming that you’re biased against all races 🙂
On the other hand, IMO, the best idea is just to be honest. The odds are (overwhelmingly) that you won’t be picked anyways. It’s not worth gaming the system, work deadlines and all.
PS: if you happen to be highly educated, your chance of being picked is nearly zero. Lawyers seem to very much dislike educated jurors; that’s saying something sad about our legal system.
ParticipantAs Homer Simpson once said, you can get off jury duty by claiming that you’re biased against all races 🙂
On the other hand, IMO, the best idea is just to be honest. The odds are (overwhelmingly) that you won’t be picked anyways. It’s not worth gaming the system, work deadlines and all.
PS: if you happen to be highly educated, your chance of being picked is nearly zero. Lawyers seem to very much dislike educated jurors; that’s saying something sad about our legal system.
ParticipantAs Homer Simpson once said, you can get off jury duty by claiming that you’re biased against all races 🙂
On the other hand, IMO, the best idea is just to be honest. The odds are (overwhelmingly) that you won’t be picked anyways. It’s not worth gaming the system, work deadlines and all.
PS: if you happen to be highly educated, your chance of being picked is nearly zero. Lawyers seem to very much dislike educated jurors; that’s saying something sad about our legal system.
ParticipantAs Homer Simpson once said, you can get off jury duty by claiming that you’re biased against all races 🙂
On the other hand, IMO, the best idea is just to be honest. The odds are (overwhelmingly) that you won’t be picked anyways. It’s not worth gaming the system, work deadlines and all.
PS: if you happen to be highly educated, your chance of being picked is nearly zero. Lawyers seem to very much dislike educated jurors; that’s saying something sad about our legal system.
ParticipantAs Homer Simpson once said, you can get off jury duty by claiming that you’re biased against all races 🙂
On the other hand, IMO, the best idea is just to be honest. The odds are (overwhelmingly) that you won’t be picked anyways. It’s not worth gaming the system, work deadlines and all.
PS: if you happen to be highly educated, your chance of being picked is nearly zero. Lawyers seem to very much dislike educated jurors; that’s saying something sad about our legal system.
ParticipantNo, the county won’t initiate foreclosure, it’s too much of a hassle. The county will sell the lien to investors. You can google “tax lien investing”, or something like that, I’m sure there is a ton written on it on the internet.
The idea is that an investor pays the county the entire past due amount, then takes it upon himself or herself to initiate foreclosure proceedings. If the delinquent homeowner pays up the amount plus interest (the usual outcome), the investor goes away with a profit. If the owner balks, the investor can take the house, but that doesn’t happen very often, though.
ParticipantNo, the county won’t initiate foreclosure, it’s too much of a hassle. The county will sell the lien to investors. You can google “tax lien investing”, or something like that, I’m sure there is a ton written on it on the internet.
The idea is that an investor pays the county the entire past due amount, then takes it upon himself or herself to initiate foreclosure proceedings. If the delinquent homeowner pays up the amount plus interest (the usual outcome), the investor goes away with a profit. If the owner balks, the investor can take the house, but that doesn’t happen very often, though.
ParticipantNo, the county won’t initiate foreclosure, it’s too much of a hassle. The county will sell the lien to investors. You can google “tax lien investing”, or something like that, I’m sure there is a ton written on it on the internet.
The idea is that an investor pays the county the entire past due amount, then takes it upon himself or herself to initiate foreclosure proceedings. If the delinquent homeowner pays up the amount plus interest (the usual outcome), the investor goes away with a profit. If the owner balks, the investor can take the house, but that doesn’t happen very often, though.
ParticipantNo, the county won’t initiate foreclosure, it’s too much of a hassle. The county will sell the lien to investors. You can google “tax lien investing”, or something like that, I’m sure there is a ton written on it on the internet.
The idea is that an investor pays the county the entire past due amount, then takes it upon himself or herself to initiate foreclosure proceedings. If the delinquent homeowner pays up the amount plus interest (the usual outcome), the investor goes away with a profit. If the owner balks, the investor can take the house, but that doesn’t happen very often, though.
ParticipantNo, the county won’t initiate foreclosure, it’s too much of a hassle. The county will sell the lien to investors. You can google “tax lien investing”, or something like that, I’m sure there is a ton written on it on the internet.
The idea is that an investor pays the county the entire past due amount, then takes it upon himself or herself to initiate foreclosure proceedings. If the delinquent homeowner pays up the amount plus interest (the usual outcome), the investor goes away with a profit. If the owner balks, the investor can take the house, but that doesn’t happen very often, though.
ParticipantPlease tell me it’s not called Carmel Valley Highlands 🙂 What’s next? “Carmel Mountain Flatlands”? “Carmel Rainy Deserts”?
-
AuthorPosts
