Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
cooperthedog
ParticipantJust remember the phrase:
Pig’s (not piggs) get slaughtered
Works in both market directions.Actually, its “pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered”.
So its good to be a pig(g)!cooperthedog
ParticipantJust remember the phrase:
Pig’s (not piggs) get slaughtered
Works in both market directions.Actually, its “pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered”.
So its good to be a pig(g)!cooperthedog
ParticipantJust remember the phrase:
Pig’s (not piggs) get slaughtered
Works in both market directions.Actually, its “pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered”.
So its good to be a pig(g)!cooperthedog
ParticipantJust remember the phrase:
Pig’s (not piggs) get slaughtered
Works in both market directions.Actually, its “pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered”.
So its good to be a pig(g)!cooperthedog
ParticipantInstead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
cooperthedog
ParticipantInstead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
cooperthedog
ParticipantInstead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
cooperthedog
ParticipantInstead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
cooperthedog
ParticipantInstead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
May 22, 2008 at 11:57 AM in reply to: Now tell me the Fed is not causing the current commodity crisis. #209782cooperthedog
ParticipantI tend to agree with arraya, especially in the long run.
I think the current price of oil is a little overdone, due in part to the dollar devaluation & easy money. If the world economies stall and/or the dollar rallies, oil should come off in the near term.
Long term though we run into declining supply and increased demand. The supply side can’t be remedied without major price increases, and even then the supply is still finite, so it just buys time. On the demand side, the world economies would have to peak or stagnant in order to curb demand, including a halt to emerging market infrastructure buildout & middle class consumption (which seems highly unlikely if oil prices moderate or decrease). Also, a concerted effort to use oil more efficiently, especially to power transportatnon, would need to occur. Ironically, transitioning everyone from gas guzzling vehicles to high mpg ones will require even more oil in order to extract the resources and build the new vehicles.
In my opinion, the only viable long term solution is to transition on a very large scale to renewable energy, primarily solar, using hydrogen as a carrier for high powered applications (liberated via renewable sources). I think the current oil “crisis” may actually be of great benefit if the US realizes that we need to build out this infrastructure now. In the intermediate term we will have to rely on coal, natgas, & nuclear until a truly renewable energy base is acquired. Of course all of this takes decades, and if we don’t start now, the pain will only get worse…
May 22, 2008 at 11:57 AM in reply to: Now tell me the Fed is not causing the current commodity crisis. #209848cooperthedog
ParticipantI tend to agree with arraya, especially in the long run.
I think the current price of oil is a little overdone, due in part to the dollar devaluation & easy money. If the world economies stall and/or the dollar rallies, oil should come off in the near term.
Long term though we run into declining supply and increased demand. The supply side can’t be remedied without major price increases, and even then the supply is still finite, so it just buys time. On the demand side, the world economies would have to peak or stagnant in order to curb demand, including a halt to emerging market infrastructure buildout & middle class consumption (which seems highly unlikely if oil prices moderate or decrease). Also, a concerted effort to use oil more efficiently, especially to power transportatnon, would need to occur. Ironically, transitioning everyone from gas guzzling vehicles to high mpg ones will require even more oil in order to extract the resources and build the new vehicles.
In my opinion, the only viable long term solution is to transition on a very large scale to renewable energy, primarily solar, using hydrogen as a carrier for high powered applications (liberated via renewable sources). I think the current oil “crisis” may actually be of great benefit if the US realizes that we need to build out this infrastructure now. In the intermediate term we will have to rely on coal, natgas, & nuclear until a truly renewable energy base is acquired. Of course all of this takes decades, and if we don’t start now, the pain will only get worse…
May 22, 2008 at 11:57 AM in reply to: Now tell me the Fed is not causing the current commodity crisis. #209880cooperthedog
ParticipantI tend to agree with arraya, especially in the long run.
I think the current price of oil is a little overdone, due in part to the dollar devaluation & easy money. If the world economies stall and/or the dollar rallies, oil should come off in the near term.
Long term though we run into declining supply and increased demand. The supply side can’t be remedied without major price increases, and even then the supply is still finite, so it just buys time. On the demand side, the world economies would have to peak or stagnant in order to curb demand, including a halt to emerging market infrastructure buildout & middle class consumption (which seems highly unlikely if oil prices moderate or decrease). Also, a concerted effort to use oil more efficiently, especially to power transportatnon, would need to occur. Ironically, transitioning everyone from gas guzzling vehicles to high mpg ones will require even more oil in order to extract the resources and build the new vehicles.
In my opinion, the only viable long term solution is to transition on a very large scale to renewable energy, primarily solar, using hydrogen as a carrier for high powered applications (liberated via renewable sources). I think the current oil “crisis” may actually be of great benefit if the US realizes that we need to build out this infrastructure now. In the intermediate term we will have to rely on coal, natgas, & nuclear until a truly renewable energy base is acquired. Of course all of this takes decades, and if we don’t start now, the pain will only get worse…
May 22, 2008 at 11:57 AM in reply to: Now tell me the Fed is not causing the current commodity crisis. #209899cooperthedog
ParticipantI tend to agree with arraya, especially in the long run.
I think the current price of oil is a little overdone, due in part to the dollar devaluation & easy money. If the world economies stall and/or the dollar rallies, oil should come off in the near term.
Long term though we run into declining supply and increased demand. The supply side can’t be remedied without major price increases, and even then the supply is still finite, so it just buys time. On the demand side, the world economies would have to peak or stagnant in order to curb demand, including a halt to emerging market infrastructure buildout & middle class consumption (which seems highly unlikely if oil prices moderate or decrease). Also, a concerted effort to use oil more efficiently, especially to power transportatnon, would need to occur. Ironically, transitioning everyone from gas guzzling vehicles to high mpg ones will require even more oil in order to extract the resources and build the new vehicles.
In my opinion, the only viable long term solution is to transition on a very large scale to renewable energy, primarily solar, using hydrogen as a carrier for high powered applications (liberated via renewable sources). I think the current oil “crisis” may actually be of great benefit if the US realizes that we need to build out this infrastructure now. In the intermediate term we will have to rely on coal, natgas, & nuclear until a truly renewable energy base is acquired. Of course all of this takes decades, and if we don’t start now, the pain will only get worse…
May 22, 2008 at 11:57 AM in reply to: Now tell me the Fed is not causing the current commodity crisis. #209932cooperthedog
ParticipantI tend to agree with arraya, especially in the long run.
I think the current price of oil is a little overdone, due in part to the dollar devaluation & easy money. If the world economies stall and/or the dollar rallies, oil should come off in the near term.
Long term though we run into declining supply and increased demand. The supply side can’t be remedied without major price increases, and even then the supply is still finite, so it just buys time. On the demand side, the world economies would have to peak or stagnant in order to curb demand, including a halt to emerging market infrastructure buildout & middle class consumption (which seems highly unlikely if oil prices moderate or decrease). Also, a concerted effort to use oil more efficiently, especially to power transportatnon, would need to occur. Ironically, transitioning everyone from gas guzzling vehicles to high mpg ones will require even more oil in order to extract the resources and build the new vehicles.
In my opinion, the only viable long term solution is to transition on a very large scale to renewable energy, primarily solar, using hydrogen as a carrier for high powered applications (liberated via renewable sources). I think the current oil “crisis” may actually be of great benefit if the US realizes that we need to build out this infrastructure now. In the intermediate term we will have to rely on coal, natgas, & nuclear until a truly renewable energy base is acquired. Of course all of this takes decades, and if we don’t start now, the pain will only get worse…
-
AuthorPosts
