Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 7, 2008 at 6:20 PM in reply to: AIG exec spa retreat less than 1 wk after bailout. $200K for hotel rooms and $23k for spa services #283102October 7, 2008 at 6:20 PM in reply to: AIG exec spa retreat less than 1 wk after bailout. $200K for hotel rooms and $23k for spa services #283129
CAwireman
ParticipantFor starters, publish the names and faces of the senior managers who chose this activity.
If we can’t go after them in court, then just publicize who did what….
October 7, 2008 at 6:20 PM in reply to: AIG exec spa retreat less than 1 wk after bailout. $200K for hotel rooms and $23k for spa services #283145ParticipantFor starters, publish the names and faces of the senior managers who chose this activity.
If we can’t go after them in court, then just publicize who did what….
October 7, 2008 at 6:20 PM in reply to: AIG exec spa retreat less than 1 wk after bailout. $200K for hotel rooms and $23k for spa services #283156ParticipantFor starters, publish the names and faces of the senior managers who chose this activity.
If we can’t go after them in court, then just publicize who did what….
ParticipantAlways be checking your facts…..
Contrary to Internet folklore, Dr. Kamerschen is NOT the author of “Tax Cuts: A Simple Lesson in Economics.” Additionally, he does NOT know who wrote it.
ParticipantAlways be checking your facts…..
Contrary to Internet folklore, Dr. Kamerschen is NOT the author of “Tax Cuts: A Simple Lesson in Economics.” Additionally, he does NOT know who wrote it.
ParticipantAlways be checking your facts…..
Contrary to Internet folklore, Dr. Kamerschen is NOT the author of “Tax Cuts: A Simple Lesson in Economics.” Additionally, he does NOT know who wrote it.
ParticipantAlways be checking your facts…..
Contrary to Internet folklore, Dr. Kamerschen is NOT the author of “Tax Cuts: A Simple Lesson in Economics.” Additionally, he does NOT know who wrote it.
ParticipantAlways be checking your facts…..
Contrary to Internet folklore, Dr. Kamerschen is NOT the author of “Tax Cuts: A Simple Lesson in Economics.” Additionally, he does NOT know who wrote it.
ParticipantPalin is pleasant to listen to and isn’t too hard on the eyes. That’s about it.
But on the last post by Arraya, I think that staying in Iraq to “Oversee the oil supplies” will possibly be what keeps us there long term.
I’ve heard that the US has secrectly desired having a foothold in the middle east for some time. This definitely achieves that goal.
Bush has said that history will prove this war to have been the correct choice. Wouldn’t it be strangely unsettling if we end up in agreement with his statement? (Not you jf, we already know what you think….)
If the US continues to occupy Iraq and at some point begins to benefit from the oil there, especially with China willing to soak it up from all other sources at any price, it could, in a twisted way gain support. But, this would confirm that Bush used WMD as an empty excuse to go into Iraq, which is what everyone thought to begin with…
ParticipantPalin is pleasant to listen to and isn’t too hard on the eyes. That’s about it.
But on the last post by Arraya, I think that staying in Iraq to “Oversee the oil supplies” will possibly be what keeps us there long term.
I’ve heard that the US has secrectly desired having a foothold in the middle east for some time. This definitely achieves that goal.
Bush has said that history will prove this war to have been the correct choice. Wouldn’t it be strangely unsettling if we end up in agreement with his statement? (Not you jf, we already know what you think….)
If the US continues to occupy Iraq and at some point begins to benefit from the oil there, especially with China willing to soak it up from all other sources at any price, it could, in a twisted way gain support. But, this would confirm that Bush used WMD as an empty excuse to go into Iraq, which is what everyone thought to begin with…
ParticipantPalin is pleasant to listen to and isn’t too hard on the eyes. That’s about it.
But on the last post by Arraya, I think that staying in Iraq to “Oversee the oil supplies” will possibly be what keeps us there long term.
I’ve heard that the US has secrectly desired having a foothold in the middle east for some time. This definitely achieves that goal.
Bush has said that history will prove this war to have been the correct choice. Wouldn’t it be strangely unsettling if we end up in agreement with his statement? (Not you jf, we already know what you think….)
If the US continues to occupy Iraq and at some point begins to benefit from the oil there, especially with China willing to soak it up from all other sources at any price, it could, in a twisted way gain support. But, this would confirm that Bush used WMD as an empty excuse to go into Iraq, which is what everyone thought to begin with…
ParticipantPalin is pleasant to listen to and isn’t too hard on the eyes. That’s about it.
But on the last post by Arraya, I think that staying in Iraq to “Oversee the oil supplies” will possibly be what keeps us there long term.
I’ve heard that the US has secrectly desired having a foothold in the middle east for some time. This definitely achieves that goal.
Bush has said that history will prove this war to have been the correct choice. Wouldn’t it be strangely unsettling if we end up in agreement with his statement? (Not you jf, we already know what you think….)
If the US continues to occupy Iraq and at some point begins to benefit from the oil there, especially with China willing to soak it up from all other sources at any price, it could, in a twisted way gain support. But, this would confirm that Bush used WMD as an empty excuse to go into Iraq, which is what everyone thought to begin with…
ParticipantPalin is pleasant to listen to and isn’t too hard on the eyes. That’s about it.
But on the last post by Arraya, I think that staying in Iraq to “Oversee the oil supplies” will possibly be what keeps us there long term.
I’ve heard that the US has secrectly desired having a foothold in the middle east for some time. This definitely achieves that goal.
Bush has said that history will prove this war to have been the correct choice. Wouldn’t it be strangely unsettling if we end up in agreement with his statement? (Not you jf, we already know what you think….)
If the US continues to occupy Iraq and at some point begins to benefit from the oil there, especially with China willing to soak it up from all other sources at any price, it could, in a twisted way gain support. But, this would confirm that Bush used WMD as an empty excuse to go into Iraq, which is what everyone thought to begin with…
October 5, 2008 at 5:50 PM in reply to: Still thing moving to Euro’s is good thing? Still think Europe is immuned from this mess??? #281566ParticipantAre these international financial issues caused largely by investment in shakey US MBS?
Or are they largeley internal issues within those countries?
On one of the news shows this morning, I believe there was mention made of this being largely due to trust in the exotic investment intruments that originated in the US….
-
AuthorPosts