[CAwireman]

[quote=flu]Face it… In america, we’re quickly becoming like a lot of other nations. There’s going to be a rich class and there’s going to a a poor class, and there’s nothing in between….
And it will have have nothing to do about how hard you work or how much you work. What it will be about is who controls what assets before the dollar falls flat on it’s face.

This is harsh reality if we continue going down our current path….Buy assets[/quote]

flu,

This is what keeps me up at night. The stark about face the economy is taking, and the accelerating lack of a Value Proposition for the US. We are becoming irrelavent with each passing day. On average we each produce too little, and consume to much to approach being competitive with our international rivals.

While I dislike the approach (keep a strong military so we can more effectively control the planet and guide it towards our needs/desires) seems to make more and more sense if we want to maintain the status quo for as long as possible.

What I understand in terms of classes, you indeed have the upper powerful/rich, but then you have a subclass of those who service the upper class. Then, you have the lower class/poverty level.

[CAwireman]

[quote=flu]Face it… In america, we’re quickly becoming like a lot of other nations. There’s going to be a rich class and there’s going to a a poor class, and there’s nothing in between….
And it will have have nothing to do about how hard you work or how much you work. What it will be about is who controls what assets before the dollar falls flat on it’s face.

This is harsh reality if we continue going down our current path….Buy assets[/quote]

flu,

This is what keeps me up at night. The stark about face the economy is taking, and the accelerating lack of a Value Proposition for the US. We are becoming irrelavent with each passing day. On average we each produce too little, and consume to much to approach being competitive with our international rivals.

While I dislike the approach (keep a strong military so we can more effectively control the planet and guide it towards our needs/desires) seems to make more and more sense if we want to maintain the status quo for as long as possible.

What I understand in terms of classes, you indeed have the upper powerful/rich, but then you have a subclass of those who service the upper class. Then, you have the lower class/poverty level.

[CAwireman]

[quote=flu]Face it… In america, we’re quickly becoming like a lot of other nations. There’s going to be a rich class and there’s going to a a poor class, and there’s nothing in between….
And it will have have nothing to do about how hard you work or how much you work. What it will be about is who controls what assets before the dollar falls flat on it’s face.

This is harsh reality if we continue going down our current path….Buy assets[/quote]

flu,

This is what keeps me up at night. The stark about face the economy is taking, and the accelerating lack of a Value Proposition for the US. We are becoming irrelavent with each passing day. On average we each produce too little, and consume to much to approach being competitive with our international rivals.

While I dislike the approach (keep a strong military so we can more effectively control the planet and guide it towards our needs/desires) seems to make more and more sense if we want to maintain the status quo for as long as possible.

What I understand in terms of classes, you indeed have the upper powerful/rich, but then you have a subclass of those who service the upper class. Then, you have the lower class/poverty level.

[CAwireman]

[quote=flu]Face it… In america, we’re quickly becoming like a lot of other nations. There’s going to be a rich class and there’s going to a a poor class, and there’s nothing in between….
And it will have have nothing to do about how hard you work or how much you work. What it will be about is who controls what assets before the dollar falls flat on it’s face.

This is harsh reality if we continue going down our current path….Buy assets[/quote]

flu,

This is what keeps me up at night. The stark about face the economy is taking, and the accelerating lack of a Value Proposition for the US. We are becoming irrelavent with each passing day. On average we each produce too little, and consume to much to approach being competitive with our international rivals.

While I dislike the approach (keep a strong military so we can more effectively control the planet and guide it towards our needs/desires) seems to make more and more sense if we want to maintain the status quo for as long as possible.

What I understand in terms of classes, you indeed have the upper powerful/rich, but then you have a subclass of those who service the upper class. Then, you have the lower class/poverty level.

[CAwireman]

I’m no expert in the methodology of posting “for lease” signs on commercial reasestate, but I seem to recall that the signs were typically green in color.

Now, I see quite a few red signs – presumaably to capture more attention? Anyone happen to know if that’s really the case….

But yes, about 8 months ago, I did notice all the signs in those areas, and also the ones mentioned along Mira Mesa. I stopped looking at them once they became so common place and because they were making me depressed….

[CAwireman]

I’m no expert in the methodology of posting “for lease” signs on commercial reasestate, but I seem to recall that the signs were typically green in color.

Now, I see quite a few red signs – presumaably to capture more attention? Anyone happen to know if that’s really the case….

But yes, about 8 months ago, I did notice all the signs in those areas, and also the ones mentioned along Mira Mesa. I stopped looking at them once they became so common place and because they were making me depressed….

[CAwireman]

I’m no expert in the methodology of posting “for lease” signs on commercial reasestate, but I seem to recall that the signs were typically green in color.

Now, I see quite a few red signs – presumaably to capture more attention? Anyone happen to know if that’s really the case….

But yes, about 8 months ago, I did notice all the signs in those areas, and also the ones mentioned along Mira Mesa. I stopped looking at them once they became so common place and because they were making me depressed….

[CAwireman]

I’m no expert in the methodology of posting “for lease” signs on commercial reasestate, but I seem to recall that the signs were typically green in color.

Now, I see quite a few red signs – presumaably to capture more attention? Anyone happen to know if that’s really the case….

But yes, about 8 months ago, I did notice all the signs in those areas, and also the ones mentioned along Mira Mesa. I stopped looking at them once they became so common place and because they were making me depressed….

[CAwireman]

I’m no expert in the methodology of posting “for lease” signs on commercial reasestate, but I seem to recall that the signs were typically green in color.

Now, I see quite a few red signs – presumaably to capture more attention? Anyone happen to know if that’s really the case….

But yes, about 8 months ago, I did notice all the signs in those areas, and also the ones mentioned along Mira Mesa. I stopped looking at them once they became so common place and because they were making me depressed….

[CAwireman]

[quote=walterwhite]Perhaps the vow should include; ” do you, Brian agree to have sex with Edith and Edith only, until you drop dead, unless she dies first, and if she’s pissed at you, and refuses to have sex with you, in which case you agree that you will have no sex whatsoever, for whatever time period Edith specifies, completely at her discretion, other than with yourself, of course, but in any event discreetly, for as long as it takes for edith to momentarily suspend her disgust with you ling enough to engage in intercourse, and to in any event not have sex with anyone employed in the household under any circumstances, even if you haven’t gotten laid in like a year.

I do”[/quote]

Walt, not sure how tongue in cheek you’re being here, but this definitely cracked me up.

The thing about Arny is that I had come to trust that despite knowing about his wild and crazy past, he had grown up and had developed self control and hopefully wisdom.

On the whole marriage thing, if the spouses aren’t compatible enough to keep the romantic fires burning,then they probably aren’t made (not maid) for each other. So, why cary on the facade. But lots of us, so far, are making a decent go of it.

There are many established singles out who are happy with it. When you tie the knot, you commit to at least trying really, really hard to give up the swinging.

I think at some level, a lot of the guys like at least the “idea” of fooling around, and when someone else gets away with it, they not only supportive in sort of a libertarian do whatcha like sort of way, but also feel that they’ve missed out – either because of being the loyal faithful type, or the socially inept “can’t get a date” type (ring any bells?)

Here’s the first late night TV ribbing I’ve seen:
http://www.nbc.com/the-tonight-show/video/monologue-51711/1328103/
But, it was on every new channel non-stop for days and days…

[CAwireman]

[quote=walterwhite]Perhaps the vow should include; ” do you, Brian agree to have sex with Edith and Edith only, until you drop dead, unless she dies first, and if she’s pissed at you, and refuses to have sex with you, in which case you agree that you will have no sex whatsoever, for whatever time period Edith specifies, completely at her discretion, other than with yourself, of course, but in any event discreetly, for as long as it takes for edith to momentarily suspend her disgust with you ling enough to engage in intercourse, and to in any event not have sex with anyone employed in the household under any circumstances, even if you haven’t gotten laid in like a year.

I do”[/quote]

Walt, not sure how tongue in cheek you’re being here, but this definitely cracked me up.

The thing about Arny is that I had come to trust that despite knowing about his wild and crazy past, he had grown up and had developed self control and hopefully wisdom.

On the whole marriage thing, if the spouses aren’t compatible enough to keep the romantic fires burning,then they probably aren’t made (not maid) for each other. So, why cary on the facade. But lots of us, so far, are making a decent go of it.

There are many established singles out who are happy with it. When you tie the knot, you commit to at least trying really, really hard to give up the swinging.

I think at some level, a lot of the guys like at least the “idea” of fooling around, and when someone else gets away with it, they not only supportive in sort of a libertarian do whatcha like sort of way, but also feel that they’ve missed out – either because of being the loyal faithful type, or the socially inept “can’t get a date” type (ring any bells?)

Here’s the first late night TV ribbing I’ve seen:
http://www.nbc.com/the-tonight-show/video/monologue-51711/1328103/
But, it was on every new channel non-stop for days and days…

[CAwireman]

[quote=walterwhite]Perhaps the vow should include; ” do you, Brian agree to have sex with Edith and Edith only, until you drop dead, unless she dies first, and if she’s pissed at you, and refuses to have sex with you, in which case you agree that you will have no sex whatsoever, for whatever time period Edith specifies, completely at her discretion, other than with yourself, of course, but in any event discreetly, for as long as it takes for edith to momentarily suspend her disgust with you ling enough to engage in intercourse, and to in any event not have sex with anyone employed in the household under any circumstances, even if you haven’t gotten laid in like a year.

I do”[/quote]

Walt, not sure how tongue in cheek you’re being here, but this definitely cracked me up.

The thing about Arny is that I had come to trust that despite knowing about his wild and crazy past, he had grown up and had developed self control and hopefully wisdom.

On the whole marriage thing, if the spouses aren’t compatible enough to keep the romantic fires burning,then they probably aren’t made (not maid) for each other. So, why cary on the facade. But lots of us, so far, are making a decent go of it.

There are many established singles out who are happy with it. When you tie the knot, you commit to at least trying really, really hard to give up the swinging.

I think at some level, a lot of the guys like at least the “idea” of fooling around, and when someone else gets away with it, they not only supportive in sort of a libertarian do whatcha like sort of way, but also feel that they’ve missed out – either because of being the loyal faithful type, or the socially inept “can’t get a date” type (ring any bells?)

Here’s the first late night TV ribbing I’ve seen:
http://www.nbc.com/the-tonight-show/video/monologue-51711/1328103/
But, it was on every new channel non-stop for days and days…

[CAwireman]

[quote=walterwhite]Perhaps the vow should include; ” do you, Brian agree to have sex with Edith and Edith only, until you drop dead, unless she dies first, and if she’s pissed at you, and refuses to have sex with you, in which case you agree that you will have no sex whatsoever, for whatever time period Edith specifies, completely at her discretion, other than with yourself, of course, but in any event discreetly, for as long as it takes for edith to momentarily suspend her disgust with you ling enough to engage in intercourse, and to in any event not have sex with anyone employed in the household under any circumstances, even if you haven’t gotten laid in like a year.

I do”[/quote]

Walt, not sure how tongue in cheek you’re being here, but this definitely cracked me up.

The thing about Arny is that I had come to trust that despite knowing about his wild and crazy past, he had grown up and had developed self control and hopefully wisdom.

On the whole marriage thing, if the spouses aren’t compatible enough to keep the romantic fires burning,then they probably aren’t made (not maid) for each other. So, why cary on the facade. But lots of us, so far, are making a decent go of it.

There are many established singles out who are happy with it. When you tie the knot, you commit to at least trying really, really hard to give up the swinging.

I think at some level, a lot of the guys like at least the “idea” of fooling around, and when someone else gets away with it, they not only supportive in sort of a libertarian do whatcha like sort of way, but also feel that they’ve missed out – either because of being the loyal faithful type, or the socially inept “can’t get a date” type (ring any bells?)

Here’s the first late night TV ribbing I’ve seen:
http://www.nbc.com/the-tonight-show/video/monologue-51711/1328103/
But, it was on every new channel non-stop for days and days…

[CAwireman]

[quote=walterwhite]Perhaps the vow should include; ” do you, Brian agree to have sex with Edith and Edith only, until you drop dead, unless she dies first, and if she’s pissed at you, and refuses to have sex with you, in which case you agree that you will have no sex whatsoever, for whatever time period Edith specifies, completely at her discretion, other than with yourself, of course, but in any event discreetly, for as long as it takes for edith to momentarily suspend her disgust with you ling enough to engage in intercourse, and to in any event not have sex with anyone employed in the household under any circumstances, even if you haven’t gotten laid in like a year.

I do”[/quote]

Walt, not sure how tongue in cheek you’re being here, but this definitely cracked me up.

The thing about Arny is that I had come to trust that despite knowing about his wild and crazy past, he had grown up and had developed self control and hopefully wisdom.

On the whole marriage thing, if the spouses aren’t compatible enough to keep the romantic fires burning,then they probably aren’t made (not maid) for each other. So, why cary on the facade. But lots of us, so far, are making a decent go of it.

There are many established singles out who are happy with it. When you tie the knot, you commit to at least trying really, really hard to give up the swinging.

I think at some level, a lot of the guys like at least the “idea” of fooling around, and when someone else gets away with it, they not only supportive in sort of a libertarian do whatcha like sort of way, but also feel that they’ve missed out – either because of being the loyal faithful type, or the socially inept “can’t get a date” type (ring any bells?)

Here’s the first late night TV ribbing I’ve seen:
http://www.nbc.com/the-tonight-show/video/monologue-51711/1328103/
But, it was on every new channel non-stop for days and days…

[CAwireman]

Briansd,

This is great!

[quote=briansd1]

Arnold is now the Sperminator. ;)[/quote]

[Author]

Posts