Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
cashmanParticipant
Although I am not defending Alex’s credentials, I would like to offer my two cents about renting. I sold my home in Nov. 2005 and profited nicely. I’ve been renting a substantially more modest home since, currently paying $2850 per month. Putting the financial aspects of today’s housing market aside, I have to say “renting sucks”. I have to be constantly vigilant about what I do with the house, such as hanging pictures, window coverings, painting over outdated wallpaper (which is not allowed), etc. I don’t dare install my wonderful home theater system which would require major drywall magic. There’s always the priorities of the owner lurking in the shadows, which could force me to move whenever he so desires. So to sum it up, as a renter, I’ve had to make many sacrifices and compromises which sometimes makes me wonder if the financial benefits are really worth it considering how short life is at my age (over 50). This much I can sympathize with Alex. I calculate I have spent approximately $73000 in my tenure as a renter, with no end in sight. True, I would have lost more than that had I kept my home, probably by more than $100K, but that number should stabilize and narrow the more years that I am a renter and as housing itself finds a bottom. In the end I’m sure I’ll have saved money, but not without sacrifice, no opportunity for that personal pride of ownership for all those years, and without question a diminished quality of life. The only thing that will be improved is the size of my bank account. Some wise person told me that there’s more to life than money. The older I get, and as the clock of life counts down, I’m inclined to give that idea more serious thought.
cashmanParticipantAlthough I am not defending Alex’s credentials, I would like to offer my two cents about renting. I sold my home in Nov. 2005 and profited nicely. I’ve been renting a substantially more modest home since, currently paying $2850 per month. Putting the financial aspects of today’s housing market aside, I have to say “renting sucks”. I have to be constantly vigilant about what I do with the house, such as hanging pictures, window coverings, painting over outdated wallpaper (which is not allowed), etc. I don’t dare install my wonderful home theater system which would require major drywall magic. There’s always the priorities of the owner lurking in the shadows, which could force me to move whenever he so desires. So to sum it up, as a renter, I’ve had to make many sacrifices and compromises which sometimes makes me wonder if the financial benefits are really worth it considering how short life is at my age (over 50). This much I can sympathize with Alex. I calculate I have spent approximately $73000 in my tenure as a renter, with no end in sight. True, I would have lost more than that had I kept my home, probably by more than $100K, but that number should stabilize and narrow the more years that I am a renter and as housing itself finds a bottom. In the end I’m sure I’ll have saved money, but not without sacrifice, no opportunity for that personal pride of ownership for all those years, and without question a diminished quality of life. The only thing that will be improved is the size of my bank account. Some wise person told me that there’s more to life than money. The older I get, and as the clock of life counts down, I’m inclined to give that idea more serious thought.
cashmanParticipantAlthough I am not defending Alex’s credentials, I would like to offer my two cents about renting. I sold my home in Nov. 2005 and profited nicely. I’ve been renting a substantially more modest home since, currently paying $2850 per month. Putting the financial aspects of today’s housing market aside, I have to say “renting sucks”. I have to be constantly vigilant about what I do with the house, such as hanging pictures, window coverings, painting over outdated wallpaper (which is not allowed), etc. I don’t dare install my wonderful home theater system which would require major drywall magic. There’s always the priorities of the owner lurking in the shadows, which could force me to move whenever he so desires. So to sum it up, as a renter, I’ve had to make many sacrifices and compromises which sometimes makes me wonder if the financial benefits are really worth it considering how short life is at my age (over 50). This much I can sympathize with Alex. I calculate I have spent approximately $73000 in my tenure as a renter, with no end in sight. True, I would have lost more than that had I kept my home, probably by more than $100K, but that number should stabilize and narrow the more years that I am a renter and as housing itself finds a bottom. In the end I’m sure I’ll have saved money, but not without sacrifice, no opportunity for that personal pride of ownership for all those years, and without question a diminished quality of life. The only thing that will be improved is the size of my bank account. Some wise person told me that there’s more to life than money. The older I get, and as the clock of life counts down, I’m inclined to give that idea more serious thought.
cashmanParticipantAlthough I am not defending Alex’s credentials, I would like to offer my two cents about renting. I sold my home in Nov. 2005 and profited nicely. I’ve been renting a substantially more modest home since, currently paying $2850 per month. Putting the financial aspects of today’s housing market aside, I have to say “renting sucks”. I have to be constantly vigilant about what I do with the house, such as hanging pictures, window coverings, painting over outdated wallpaper (which is not allowed), etc. I don’t dare install my wonderful home theater system which would require major drywall magic. There’s always the priorities of the owner lurking in the shadows, which could force me to move whenever he so desires. So to sum it up, as a renter, I’ve had to make many sacrifices and compromises which sometimes makes me wonder if the financial benefits are really worth it considering how short life is at my age (over 50). This much I can sympathize with Alex. I calculate I have spent approximately $73000 in my tenure as a renter, with no end in sight. True, I would have lost more than that had I kept my home, probably by more than $100K, but that number should stabilize and narrow the more years that I am a renter and as housing itself finds a bottom. In the end I’m sure I’ll have saved money, but not without sacrifice, no opportunity for that personal pride of ownership for all those years, and without question a diminished quality of life. The only thing that will be improved is the size of my bank account. Some wise person told me that there’s more to life than money. The older I get, and as the clock of life counts down, I’m inclined to give that idea more serious thought.
January 18, 2008 at 5:36 PM in reply to: Dow flirting with 12,000 – the market has everyone’s attention… #138316cashmanParticipantTime to hunker down and go to cash. This is just the start of the bear market. Remember the 2000-2001 tech wreck? That took a couple of years to play out. According to Peter Schiff, we’re in for a really prolonged bear market this time. And both Roubini and Denninger say that for 2008, cash is king. There will probably be a bounce in the market here near term. Anyone long should take that opportunity to get the hell out of the market. You may not get another chance. My targets are about 10000 on the Dow, and 1000 on the S&P. We have a long ways yet to go. 2008 is all about capital preservation. If you can do 5 percent on your money this year, be grateful.
January 18, 2008 at 5:36 PM in reply to: Dow flirting with 12,000 – the market has everyone’s attention… #138527cashmanParticipantTime to hunker down and go to cash. This is just the start of the bear market. Remember the 2000-2001 tech wreck? That took a couple of years to play out. According to Peter Schiff, we’re in for a really prolonged bear market this time. And both Roubini and Denninger say that for 2008, cash is king. There will probably be a bounce in the market here near term. Anyone long should take that opportunity to get the hell out of the market. You may not get another chance. My targets are about 10000 on the Dow, and 1000 on the S&P. We have a long ways yet to go. 2008 is all about capital preservation. If you can do 5 percent on your money this year, be grateful.
January 18, 2008 at 5:36 PM in reply to: Dow flirting with 12,000 – the market has everyone’s attention… #138551cashmanParticipantTime to hunker down and go to cash. This is just the start of the bear market. Remember the 2000-2001 tech wreck? That took a couple of years to play out. According to Peter Schiff, we’re in for a really prolonged bear market this time. And both Roubini and Denninger say that for 2008, cash is king. There will probably be a bounce in the market here near term. Anyone long should take that opportunity to get the hell out of the market. You may not get another chance. My targets are about 10000 on the Dow, and 1000 on the S&P. We have a long ways yet to go. 2008 is all about capital preservation. If you can do 5 percent on your money this year, be grateful.
January 18, 2008 at 5:36 PM in reply to: Dow flirting with 12,000 – the market has everyone’s attention… #138574cashmanParticipantTime to hunker down and go to cash. This is just the start of the bear market. Remember the 2000-2001 tech wreck? That took a couple of years to play out. According to Peter Schiff, we’re in for a really prolonged bear market this time. And both Roubini and Denninger say that for 2008, cash is king. There will probably be a bounce in the market here near term. Anyone long should take that opportunity to get the hell out of the market. You may not get another chance. My targets are about 10000 on the Dow, and 1000 on the S&P. We have a long ways yet to go. 2008 is all about capital preservation. If you can do 5 percent on your money this year, be grateful.
January 18, 2008 at 5:36 PM in reply to: Dow flirting with 12,000 – the market has everyone’s attention… #138622cashmanParticipantTime to hunker down and go to cash. This is just the start of the bear market. Remember the 2000-2001 tech wreck? That took a couple of years to play out. According to Peter Schiff, we’re in for a really prolonged bear market this time. And both Roubini and Denninger say that for 2008, cash is king. There will probably be a bounce in the market here near term. Anyone long should take that opportunity to get the hell out of the market. You may not get another chance. My targets are about 10000 on the Dow, and 1000 on the S&P. We have a long ways yet to go. 2008 is all about capital preservation. If you can do 5 percent on your money this year, be grateful.
January 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM in reply to: According to Realfacts : Rents are down and occupancies too #138311cashmanParticipantIt would make sense that rentals would be in more demand as more people lose their houses to foreclosure. They have to live somewhere, and they can’t all move in with relatives. The vacant foreclosed properties will sit vacant for a while until the bank decides what to do with them, then they will be for sale, not for rent. Rent’s are definitely up here in my area in eastern LA county/San Gabriel Valley. And I don’t see many vacancies.
January 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM in reply to: According to Realfacts : Rents are down and occupancies too #138522cashmanParticipantIt would make sense that rentals would be in more demand as more people lose their houses to foreclosure. They have to live somewhere, and they can’t all move in with relatives. The vacant foreclosed properties will sit vacant for a while until the bank decides what to do with them, then they will be for sale, not for rent. Rent’s are definitely up here in my area in eastern LA county/San Gabriel Valley. And I don’t see many vacancies.
January 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM in reply to: According to Realfacts : Rents are down and occupancies too #138546cashmanParticipantIt would make sense that rentals would be in more demand as more people lose their houses to foreclosure. They have to live somewhere, and they can’t all move in with relatives. The vacant foreclosed properties will sit vacant for a while until the bank decides what to do with them, then they will be for sale, not for rent. Rent’s are definitely up here in my area in eastern LA county/San Gabriel Valley. And I don’t see many vacancies.
January 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM in reply to: According to Realfacts : Rents are down and occupancies too #138570cashmanParticipantIt would make sense that rentals would be in more demand as more people lose their houses to foreclosure. They have to live somewhere, and they can’t all move in with relatives. The vacant foreclosed properties will sit vacant for a while until the bank decides what to do with them, then they will be for sale, not for rent. Rent’s are definitely up here in my area in eastern LA county/San Gabriel Valley. And I don’t see many vacancies.
January 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM in reply to: According to Realfacts : Rents are down and occupancies too #138617cashmanParticipantIt would make sense that rentals would be in more demand as more people lose their houses to foreclosure. They have to live somewhere, and they can’t all move in with relatives. The vacant foreclosed properties will sit vacant for a while until the bank decides what to do with them, then they will be for sale, not for rent. Rent’s are definitely up here in my area in eastern LA county/San Gabriel Valley. And I don’t see many vacancies.
-
AuthorPosts