[Casca]

“I was cultivated from the tumor on Casca’s arm.”

I’ve never had a tumor on my arm, but there was a protrusion that the docs cut out of my sphincter.

“I don’t understand what about my beliefs are communist. Nothing I believe in is of a communist nature.”

I could not have been more clear when I replied to you previously. I have not called you a communist. I have simply pointed out that liberals and communists share the same goal, redistribution of wealth. You might call it being “fair”. It is only their method that varies. Both methods are antithetical to our constitution, but any judge who can find the right to murder a child under the right to privacy in our constitution, can read the constitution to mean anything, and that is what liberals have done over the past fifty years.

You say that you don’t want a command economy, but every liberal solution is a government manipulation of the market place.

As for cultural and historical ignorance, this ties in nicely to what troubles me most about the Bobaman. Back in the days before the union thugs of the NEA took over America’s schools. I was educated in my primary years by intelligent older women who were following a calling. A big part of this education was in the simple traditions and history of our nation.

We don’t teach these things anymore. Maybe this has something to do with the affinity of younger people to Bobama. Wherever he was born, and that issue has yet to be set to rest, he was not raised in the history and traditions of this nation, nor by a mother who had a love for her native land. That’s bizarre, and frankly disqualifying for governmental leadership at almost any level.

[Casca]

[quote=Shadowfax]Casca: For the record, gandalf is a guy and I, Shadofax, am a woman. Apparently we are both Tolkien fans. And we seem to agree on a lot of things–I also share some common ground with AFF and Urbanrealtor (Dan). We are not all “clones” of each othere here to infiltrate the debate.

I am still waiting for you to “bring it.” The data that is….punk.[/quote]

LMAO, no doubt you all rode the same short bus. Try rereading my previous posts from the beginning, and move your lips really slow this time, and maybe you’ll get it.

Stanley Kurtz has reconstructed Bobama’s lost statehouse years from his local media archives. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/386abhgm.asp
Surprise, surprise, surprise, guess what he’s found.

[Casca]

[quote=Shadowfax]Casca: For the record, gandalf is a guy and I, Shadofax, am a woman. Apparently we are both Tolkien fans. And we seem to agree on a lot of things–I also share some common ground with AFF and Urbanrealtor (Dan). We are not all “clones” of each othere here to infiltrate the debate.

I am still waiting for you to “bring it.” The data that is….punk.[/quote]

LMAO, no doubt you all rode the same short bus. Try rereading my previous posts from the beginning, and move your lips really slow this time, and maybe you’ll get it.

Stanley Kurtz has reconstructed Bobama’s lost statehouse years from his local media archives. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/386abhgm.asp
Surprise, surprise, surprise, guess what he’s found.

[Casca]

[quote=Shadowfax]Casca: For the record, gandalf is a guy and I, Shadofax, am a woman. Apparently we are both Tolkien fans. And we seem to agree on a lot of things–I also share some common ground with AFF and Urbanrealtor (Dan). We are not all “clones” of each othere here to infiltrate the debate.

I am still waiting for you to “bring it.” The data that is….punk.[/quote]

LMAO, no doubt you all rode the same short bus. Try rereading my previous posts from the beginning, and move your lips really slow this time, and maybe you’ll get it.

Stanley Kurtz has reconstructed Bobama’s lost statehouse years from his local media archives. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/386abhgm.asp
Surprise, surprise, surprise, guess what he’s found.

[Casca]

[quote=Shadowfax]Casca: For the record, gandalf is a guy and I, Shadofax, am a woman. Apparently we are both Tolkien fans. And we seem to agree on a lot of things–I also share some common ground with AFF and Urbanrealtor (Dan). We are not all “clones” of each othere here to infiltrate the debate.

I am still waiting for you to “bring it.” The data that is….punk.[/quote]

LMAO, no doubt you all rode the same short bus. Try rereading my previous posts from the beginning, and move your lips really slow this time, and maybe you’ll get it.

Stanley Kurtz has reconstructed Bobama’s lost statehouse years from his local media archives. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/386abhgm.asp
Surprise, surprise, surprise, guess what he’s found.

[Casca]

[quote=Shadowfax]Casca: For the record, gandalf is a guy and I, Shadofax, am a woman. Apparently we are both Tolkien fans. And we seem to agree on a lot of things–I also share some common ground with AFF and Urbanrealtor (Dan). We are not all “clones” of each othere here to infiltrate the debate.

I am still waiting for you to “bring it.” The data that is….punk.[/quote]

LMAO, no doubt you all rode the same short bus. Try rereading my previous posts from the beginning, and move your lips really slow this time, and maybe you’ll get it.

Stanley Kurtz has reconstructed Bobama’s lost statehouse years from his local media archives. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/386abhgm.asp
Surprise, surprise, surprise, guess what he’s found.

[Casca]

[quote=gandalf]casca, I speak for myself. shadowfacts is some other Pigg. Not that it matters.

I want to point out here you haven’t actually included any FACTS in your Obama criticisms. Piggington’s motto: “In God We Trust, Everyone Else Bring Data.” Encourage you to post all the criticism you want, anything of merit. Anytime you like. Rezko was a good start. I’ll agree with you there.

So far, your rants have consisted of yammering, hate-filled bile, constipated partisan noise, unpatriotic attacks on fellow Americans (people who don’t think like you), and RACIST assertions about Obama, affirmative action and uppity black men from Harvard who have no education and have never had a job. It’s out of line.

Also, don’t go tossing out that line that you and the Republican Party are the Great Protectors of America and everybody else is a traitor. That’s a pile of fake-patriot bullshit. We’re all Americans here. All of us have skin in the game. Most of us have some pretty particular ideas about what’s going on right now.

With the Obama rants, post anything you want. Try to keep it factual, don’t be racist. With foreign-policy, most of us agree the threat posed by AQ is grave and urgent. If you have some experience in this area — raise the bar and contribute something to the discussion.[/quote]

Who died and made you boss, Cupcake? As for your definition of facts, and standards of behavior, I’ve had you pegged as a lying loon and a manipulator from the beginning. Unless you’re being paid by the Bobama camp to sit here and spin 24/7, one finds your behavior indicative of one who has little control over his own life, and is probably in need of a job. Maybe if you focused some attention in the want ads something good would happen? So call me a racist again, and type it all in bold when you write that I bring no facts, and maybe the bullshitting blowhard bobama will carry his home state.

[Casca]

[quote=gandalf]casca, I speak for myself. shadowfacts is some other Pigg. Not that it matters.

I want to point out here you haven’t actually included any FACTS in your Obama criticisms. Piggington’s motto: “In God We Trust, Everyone Else Bring Data.” Encourage you to post all the criticism you want, anything of merit. Anytime you like. Rezko was a good start. I’ll agree with you there.

So far, your rants have consisted of yammering, hate-filled bile, constipated partisan noise, unpatriotic attacks on fellow Americans (people who don’t think like you), and RACIST assertions about Obama, affirmative action and uppity black men from Harvard who have no education and have never had a job. It’s out of line.

Also, don’t go tossing out that line that you and the Republican Party are the Great Protectors of America and everybody else is a traitor. That’s a pile of fake-patriot bullshit. We’re all Americans here. All of us have skin in the game. Most of us have some pretty particular ideas about what’s going on right now.

With the Obama rants, post anything you want. Try to keep it factual, don’t be racist. With foreign-policy, most of us agree the threat posed by AQ is grave and urgent. If you have some experience in this area — raise the bar and contribute something to the discussion.[/quote]

Who died and made you boss, Cupcake? As for your definition of facts, and standards of behavior, I’ve had you pegged as a lying loon and a manipulator from the beginning. Unless you’re being paid by the Bobama camp to sit here and spin 24/7, one finds your behavior indicative of one who has little control over his own life, and is probably in need of a job. Maybe if you focused some attention in the want ads something good would happen? So call me a racist again, and type it all in bold when you write that I bring no facts, and maybe the bullshitting blowhard bobama will carry his home state.

[Casca]

[quote=gandalf]casca, I speak for myself. shadowfacts is some other Pigg. Not that it matters.

I want to point out here you haven’t actually included any FACTS in your Obama criticisms. Piggington’s motto: “In God We Trust, Everyone Else Bring Data.” Encourage you to post all the criticism you want, anything of merit. Anytime you like. Rezko was a good start. I’ll agree with you there.

So far, your rants have consisted of yammering, hate-filled bile, constipated partisan noise, unpatriotic attacks on fellow Americans (people who don’t think like you), and RACIST assertions about Obama, affirmative action and uppity black men from Harvard who have no education and have never had a job. It’s out of line.

Also, don’t go tossing out that line that you and the Republican Party are the Great Protectors of America and everybody else is a traitor. That’s a pile of fake-patriot bullshit. We’re all Americans here. All of us have skin in the game. Most of us have some pretty particular ideas about what’s going on right now.

With the Obama rants, post anything you want. Try to keep it factual, don’t be racist. With foreign-policy, most of us agree the threat posed by AQ is grave and urgent. If you have some experience in this area — raise the bar and contribute something to the discussion.[/quote]

Who died and made you boss, Cupcake? As for your definition of facts, and standards of behavior, I’ve had you pegged as a lying loon and a manipulator from the beginning. Unless you’re being paid by the Bobama camp to sit here and spin 24/7, one finds your behavior indicative of one who has little control over his own life, and is probably in need of a job. Maybe if you focused some attention in the want ads something good would happen? So call me a racist again, and type it all in bold when you write that I bring no facts, and maybe the bullshitting blowhard bobama will carry his home state.

[Casca]

[quote=gandalf]casca, I speak for myself. shadowfacts is some other Pigg. Not that it matters.

I want to point out here you haven’t actually included any FACTS in your Obama criticisms. Piggington’s motto: “In God We Trust, Everyone Else Bring Data.” Encourage you to post all the criticism you want, anything of merit. Anytime you like. Rezko was a good start. I’ll agree with you there.

So far, your rants have consisted of yammering, hate-filled bile, constipated partisan noise, unpatriotic attacks on fellow Americans (people who don’t think like you), and RACIST assertions about Obama, affirmative action and uppity black men from Harvard who have no education and have never had a job. It’s out of line.

Also, don’t go tossing out that line that you and the Republican Party are the Great Protectors of America and everybody else is a traitor. That’s a pile of fake-patriot bullshit. We’re all Americans here. All of us have skin in the game. Most of us have some pretty particular ideas about what’s going on right now.

With the Obama rants, post anything you want. Try to keep it factual, don’t be racist. With foreign-policy, most of us agree the threat posed by AQ is grave and urgent. If you have some experience in this area — raise the bar and contribute something to the discussion.[/quote]

Who died and made you boss, Cupcake? As for your definition of facts, and standards of behavior, I’ve had you pegged as a lying loon and a manipulator from the beginning. Unless you’re being paid by the Bobama camp to sit here and spin 24/7, one finds your behavior indicative of one who has little control over his own life, and is probably in need of a job. Maybe if you focused some attention in the want ads something good would happen? So call me a racist again, and type it all in bold when you write that I bring no facts, and maybe the bullshitting blowhard bobama will carry his home state.

[Casca]

[quote=gandalf]casca, I speak for myself. shadowfacts is some other Pigg. Not that it matters.

I want to point out here you haven’t actually included any FACTS in your Obama criticisms. Piggington’s motto: “In God We Trust, Everyone Else Bring Data.” Encourage you to post all the criticism you want, anything of merit. Anytime you like. Rezko was a good start. I’ll agree with you there.

So far, your rants have consisted of yammering, hate-filled bile, constipated partisan noise, unpatriotic attacks on fellow Americans (people who don’t think like you), and RACIST assertions about Obama, affirmative action and uppity black men from Harvard who have no education and have never had a job. It’s out of line.

Also, don’t go tossing out that line that you and the Republican Party are the Great Protectors of America and everybody else is a traitor. That’s a pile of fake-patriot bullshit. We’re all Americans here. All of us have skin in the game. Most of us have some pretty particular ideas about what’s going on right now.

With the Obama rants, post anything you want. Try to keep it factual, don’t be racist. With foreign-policy, most of us agree the threat posed by AQ is grave and urgent. If you have some experience in this area — raise the bar and contribute something to the discussion.[/quote]

Who died and made you boss, Cupcake? As for your definition of facts, and standards of behavior, I’ve had you pegged as a lying loon and a manipulator from the beginning. Unless you’re being paid by the Bobama camp to sit here and spin 24/7, one finds your behavior indicative of one who has little control over his own life, and is probably in need of a job. Maybe if you focused some attention in the want ads something good would happen? So call me a racist again, and type it all in bold when you write that I bring no facts, and maybe the bullshitting blowhard bobama will carry his home state.

[Casca]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=Casca]Liberals are communists without the guns.[/quote]

I am a liberal. I am not a communist. I am not a communist with or without a gun. I have no interest in a command economy or single party politics or politburo. I have worked in law enforcement and I was born (literally) on an army base on the border with communist eastern europe. I am a free rider in that I have never worked in the military myself.
Is it your assertion that all non-military (or non-combatants for that matter) are free riders?
Would it be your assertion that a draft would be better than having the existing minority fight the existing war?
Also, would it be your assertion that people who do not support the actions of the government are dumb (I think the term you used was “nitwit”)?
Or is it just that war that is the litmus test for un-patriots?
By that logic would the Russians who dodged the draft to avoid being killed by the mujahideen in Afghanistan be un-patriots?
Also, were the continental colonials in the 1770’s not deprived of something that spurred them towards war? I seem to recall something about taxation without representation. Perhaps I misread.

How do you have any idea whether someone loves their country?

Considering that a majority of Americans are not in support of the war, does that mean you don’t care for them?
If so, and if you find your countrymen (as defined by citizenship) so loathesome then why do you love your country? [/quote]

I can see that you’re confused. Allow me to simplify things for you. When Marx wrote, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his need.” He laid down the boundaries of Marxism. If you believe in achieving this form of government through the barrel of a gun, you’re a communist. If you’d like to vote it in at the ballot box, the constitution be damned, you’re a liberal.

Fifty years after the Warren Court, we’re so lost on the path as a nation, that our constitution has become almost meaningless, and the state may take any action that suits the momentary whim. The fault lies with the people. We’ve become a nation of historical and cultural ignoranimi.

As for this business of the “majority is against the war”. One may say that about any war, but it’s not that simple. It’s clear that those with skin in the game are overwhelmingly FOR the war, and thus has it been ever from Concord to Fallujah. Hell, Lincoln fully expected to be turned out of office by the vote of only the Northern states in the election of 1864. It was the vote of an Army serving in the field that won the election for him.

It’s easy to live the good life in California, sipping wine and eating cheese. How awful this Bush fellow is. Spending American lives to bother that poor fellow Saddam. Let’s see how you feel after the Iranians pop a nuke in LA.

Make no mistake, this war is about keeping the Iranians, and other Moslim whackdoodles, in their box. If you or your sons need not interrupt your lives to play a part, be grateful, and respectful of those who carry the burden for you. Anything less is in a word… unpatriotic.

[Casca]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=Casca]Liberals are communists without the guns.[/quote]

I am a liberal. I am not a communist. I am not a communist with or without a gun. I have no interest in a command economy or single party politics or politburo. I have worked in law enforcement and I was born (literally) on an army base on the border with communist eastern europe. I am a free rider in that I have never worked in the military myself.
Is it your assertion that all non-military (or non-combatants for that matter) are free riders?
Would it be your assertion that a draft would be better than having the existing minority fight the existing war?
Also, would it be your assertion that people who do not support the actions of the government are dumb (I think the term you used was “nitwit”)?
Or is it just that war that is the litmus test for un-patriots?
By that logic would the Russians who dodged the draft to avoid being killed by the mujahideen in Afghanistan be un-patriots?
Also, were the continental colonials in the 1770’s not deprived of something that spurred them towards war? I seem to recall something about taxation without representation. Perhaps I misread.

How do you have any idea whether someone loves their country?

Considering that a majority of Americans are not in support of the war, does that mean you don’t care for them?
If so, and if you find your countrymen (as defined by citizenship) so loathesome then why do you love your country? [/quote]

I can see that you’re confused. Allow me to simplify things for you. When Marx wrote, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his need.” He laid down the boundaries of Marxism. If you believe in achieving this form of government through the barrel of a gun, you’re a communist. If you’d like to vote it in at the ballot box, the constitution be damned, you’re a liberal.

Fifty years after the Warren Court, we’re so lost on the path as a nation, that our constitution has become almost meaningless, and the state may take any action that suits the momentary whim. The fault lies with the people. We’ve become a nation of historical and cultural ignoranimi.

As for this business of the “majority is against the war”. One may say that about any war, but it’s not that simple. It’s clear that those with skin in the game are overwhelmingly FOR the war, and thus has it been ever from Concord to Fallujah. Hell, Lincoln fully expected to be turned out of office by the vote of only the Northern states in the election of 1864. It was the vote of an Army serving in the field that won the election for him.

It’s easy to live the good life in California, sipping wine and eating cheese. How awful this Bush fellow is. Spending American lives to bother that poor fellow Saddam. Let’s see how you feel after the Iranians pop a nuke in LA.

Make no mistake, this war is about keeping the Iranians, and other Moslim whackdoodles, in their box. If you or your sons need not interrupt your lives to play a part, be grateful, and respectful of those who carry the burden for you. Anything less is in a word… unpatriotic.

[Casca]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=Casca]Liberals are communists without the guns.[/quote]

I am a liberal. I am not a communist. I am not a communist with or without a gun. I have no interest in a command economy or single party politics or politburo. I have worked in law enforcement and I was born (literally) on an army base on the border with communist eastern europe. I am a free rider in that I have never worked in the military myself.
Is it your assertion that all non-military (or non-combatants for that matter) are free riders?
Would it be your assertion that a draft would be better than having the existing minority fight the existing war?
Also, would it be your assertion that people who do not support the actions of the government are dumb (I think the term you used was “nitwit”)?
Or is it just that war that is the litmus test for un-patriots?
By that logic would the Russians who dodged the draft to avoid being killed by the mujahideen in Afghanistan be un-patriots?
Also, were the continental colonials in the 1770’s not deprived of something that spurred them towards war? I seem to recall something about taxation without representation. Perhaps I misread.

How do you have any idea whether someone loves their country?

Considering that a majority of Americans are not in support of the war, does that mean you don’t care for them?
If so, and if you find your countrymen (as defined by citizenship) so loathesome then why do you love your country? [/quote]

I can see that you’re confused. Allow me to simplify things for you. When Marx wrote, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his need.” He laid down the boundaries of Marxism. If you believe in achieving this form of government through the barrel of a gun, you’re a communist. If you’d like to vote it in at the ballot box, the constitution be damned, you’re a liberal.

Fifty years after the Warren Court, we’re so lost on the path as a nation, that our constitution has become almost meaningless, and the state may take any action that suits the momentary whim. The fault lies with the people. We’ve become a nation of historical and cultural ignoranimi.

As for this business of the “majority is against the war”. One may say that about any war, but it’s not that simple. It’s clear that those with skin in the game are overwhelmingly FOR the war, and thus has it been ever from Concord to Fallujah. Hell, Lincoln fully expected to be turned out of office by the vote of only the Northern states in the election of 1864. It was the vote of an Army serving in the field that won the election for him.

It’s easy to live the good life in California, sipping wine and eating cheese. How awful this Bush fellow is. Spending American lives to bother that poor fellow Saddam. Let’s see how you feel after the Iranians pop a nuke in LA.

Make no mistake, this war is about keeping the Iranians, and other Moslim whackdoodles, in their box. If you or your sons need not interrupt your lives to play a part, be grateful, and respectful of those who carry the burden for you. Anything less is in a word… unpatriotic.

[Casca]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=Casca]Liberals are communists without the guns.[/quote]

I am a liberal. I am not a communist. I am not a communist with or without a gun. I have no interest in a command economy or single party politics or politburo. I have worked in law enforcement and I was born (literally) on an army base on the border with communist eastern europe. I am a free rider in that I have never worked in the military myself.
Is it your assertion that all non-military (or non-combatants for that matter) are free riders?
Would it be your assertion that a draft would be better than having the existing minority fight the existing war?
Also, would it be your assertion that people who do not support the actions of the government are dumb (I think the term you used was “nitwit”)?
Or is it just that war that is the litmus test for un-patriots?
By that logic would the Russians who dodged the draft to avoid being killed by the mujahideen in Afghanistan be un-patriots?
Also, were the continental colonials in the 1770’s not deprived of something that spurred them towards war? I seem to recall something about taxation without representation. Perhaps I misread.

How do you have any idea whether someone loves their country?

Considering that a majority of Americans are not in support of the war, does that mean you don’t care for them?
If so, and if you find your countrymen (as defined by citizenship) so loathesome then why do you love your country? [/quote]

I can see that you’re confused. Allow me to simplify things for you. When Marx wrote, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his need.” He laid down the boundaries of Marxism. If you believe in achieving this form of government through the barrel of a gun, you’re a communist. If you’d like to vote it in at the ballot box, the constitution be damned, you’re a liberal.

Fifty years after the Warren Court, we’re so lost on the path as a nation, that our constitution has become almost meaningless, and the state may take any action that suits the momentary whim. The fault lies with the people. We’ve become a nation of historical and cultural ignoranimi.

As for this business of the “majority is against the war”. One may say that about any war, but it’s not that simple. It’s clear that those with skin in the game are overwhelmingly FOR the war, and thus has it been ever from Concord to Fallujah. Hell, Lincoln fully expected to be turned out of office by the vote of only the Northern states in the election of 1864. It was the vote of an Army serving in the field that won the election for him.

It’s easy to live the good life in California, sipping wine and eating cheese. How awful this Bush fellow is. Spending American lives to bother that poor fellow Saddam. Let’s see how you feel after the Iranians pop a nuke in LA.

Make no mistake, this war is about keeping the Iranians, and other Moslim whackdoodles, in their box. If you or your sons need not interrupt your lives to play a part, be grateful, and respectful of those who carry the burden for you. Anything less is in a word… unpatriotic.

[Author]

Posts