Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Bugs
ParticipantIt’s a sign that the decline is over and the market is turning around.
Just kidding. It’s probably a typo. The house across the street (6851 Rockland) is 200 SqFt larger, looks to have a little more curb appeal and has been marketed continuously for the last 18 months, and they haven’t been able to sell that one yet. It’s now listed at $475,000 – $539,000.
In the last 6 months there have been 4 closed sales in that neighborhood of homes of comparable size and age to this one. Interestingly, the sales prices for all 4 sales are grouped between $420,000 – $422,000. The most recent of these sales was back in September, meaning no comparable closed sales in the last 60 days.
Gee, I wonder if the listing agent meant to list this house at $409,900?
ParticipantIt’s a sign that the decline is over and the market is turning around.
Just kidding. It’s probably a typo. The house across the street (6851 Rockland) is 200 SqFt larger, looks to have a little more curb appeal and has been marketed continuously for the last 18 months, and they haven’t been able to sell that one yet. It’s now listed at $475,000 – $539,000.
In the last 6 months there have been 4 closed sales in that neighborhood of homes of comparable size and age to this one. Interestingly, the sales prices for all 4 sales are grouped between $420,000 – $422,000. The most recent of these sales was back in September, meaning no comparable closed sales in the last 60 days.
Gee, I wonder if the listing agent meant to list this house at $409,900?
ParticipantIt’s a sign that the decline is over and the market is turning around.
Just kidding. It’s probably a typo. The house across the street (6851 Rockland) is 200 SqFt larger, looks to have a little more curb appeal and has been marketed continuously for the last 18 months, and they haven’t been able to sell that one yet. It’s now listed at $475,000 – $539,000.
In the last 6 months there have been 4 closed sales in that neighborhood of homes of comparable size and age to this one. Interestingly, the sales prices for all 4 sales are grouped between $420,000 – $422,000. The most recent of these sales was back in September, meaning no comparable closed sales in the last 60 days.
Gee, I wonder if the listing agent meant to list this house at $409,900?
ParticipantIt’s a sign that the decline is over and the market is turning around.
Just kidding. It’s probably a typo. The house across the street (6851 Rockland) is 200 SqFt larger, looks to have a little more curb appeal and has been marketed continuously for the last 18 months, and they haven’t been able to sell that one yet. It’s now listed at $475,000 – $539,000.
In the last 6 months there have been 4 closed sales in that neighborhood of homes of comparable size and age to this one. Interestingly, the sales prices for all 4 sales are grouped between $420,000 – $422,000. The most recent of these sales was back in September, meaning no comparable closed sales in the last 60 days.
Gee, I wonder if the listing agent meant to list this house at $409,900?
December 18, 2007 at 5:10 PM in reply to: Ouch! SD Union Telling Like it is – March 2004 Overall Median Reached #120084ParticipantI saw that comment earlier today. I came this close to posting a retort to that one. Then there was the moron who was telling people that if they only bought AAA rated properties they’d be okay and that his 2003 purchased AAA property hadn’t lost anything yet. Talk about clueless. What’s he going to tell people next year when the pricing skips the 2003 levels and goes straight to 2002 levels?
There really are people who think the weather (and the Superbowl) will support this price structure all by itself.
BTW, I got to use the term “e-balling” (a phrase I learnt here) in conversation last week. I was teaching a CE course for appraisers on Saturday and was ranting about some of the trash-talking bulls who pontificate on the comments boards at signonsandiego.com. As it turns out, that phrase was too hip for the room – I had to explain it.
December 18, 2007 at 5:10 PM in reply to: Ouch! SD Union Telling Like it is – March 2004 Overall Median Reached #120218ParticipantI saw that comment earlier today. I came this close to posting a retort to that one. Then there was the moron who was telling people that if they only bought AAA rated properties they’d be okay and that his 2003 purchased AAA property hadn’t lost anything yet. Talk about clueless. What’s he going to tell people next year when the pricing skips the 2003 levels and goes straight to 2002 levels?
There really are people who think the weather (and the Superbowl) will support this price structure all by itself.
BTW, I got to use the term “e-balling” (a phrase I learnt here) in conversation last week. I was teaching a CE course for appraisers on Saturday and was ranting about some of the trash-talking bulls who pontificate on the comments boards at signonsandiego.com. As it turns out, that phrase was too hip for the room – I had to explain it.
December 18, 2007 at 5:10 PM in reply to: Ouch! SD Union Telling Like it is – March 2004 Overall Median Reached #120250ParticipantI saw that comment earlier today. I came this close to posting a retort to that one. Then there was the moron who was telling people that if they only bought AAA rated properties they’d be okay and that his 2003 purchased AAA property hadn’t lost anything yet. Talk about clueless. What’s he going to tell people next year when the pricing skips the 2003 levels and goes straight to 2002 levels?
There really are people who think the weather (and the Superbowl) will support this price structure all by itself.
BTW, I got to use the term “e-balling” (a phrase I learnt here) in conversation last week. I was teaching a CE course for appraisers on Saturday and was ranting about some of the trash-talking bulls who pontificate on the comments boards at signonsandiego.com. As it turns out, that phrase was too hip for the room – I had to explain it.
December 18, 2007 at 5:10 PM in reply to: Ouch! SD Union Telling Like it is – March 2004 Overall Median Reached #120295ParticipantI saw that comment earlier today. I came this close to posting a retort to that one. Then there was the moron who was telling people that if they only bought AAA rated properties they’d be okay and that his 2003 purchased AAA property hadn’t lost anything yet. Talk about clueless. What’s he going to tell people next year when the pricing skips the 2003 levels and goes straight to 2002 levels?
There really are people who think the weather (and the Superbowl) will support this price structure all by itself.
BTW, I got to use the term “e-balling” (a phrase I learnt here) in conversation last week. I was teaching a CE course for appraisers on Saturday and was ranting about some of the trash-talking bulls who pontificate on the comments boards at signonsandiego.com. As it turns out, that phrase was too hip for the room – I had to explain it.
December 18, 2007 at 5:10 PM in reply to: Ouch! SD Union Telling Like it is – March 2004 Overall Median Reached #120318ParticipantI saw that comment earlier today. I came this close to posting a retort to that one. Then there was the moron who was telling people that if they only bought AAA rated properties they’d be okay and that his 2003 purchased AAA property hadn’t lost anything yet. Talk about clueless. What’s he going to tell people next year when the pricing skips the 2003 levels and goes straight to 2002 levels?
There really are people who think the weather (and the Superbowl) will support this price structure all by itself.
BTW, I got to use the term “e-balling” (a phrase I learnt here) in conversation last week. I was teaching a CE course for appraisers on Saturday and was ranting about some of the trash-talking bulls who pontificate on the comments boards at signonsandiego.com. As it turns out, that phrase was too hip for the room – I had to explain it.
ParticipantFLU – They aren’t called “realtor-chicks” for nothing.
ParticipantFLU – They aren’t called “realtor-chicks” for nothing.
ParticipantFLU – They aren’t called “realtor-chicks” for nothing.
ParticipantFLU – They aren’t called “realtor-chicks” for nothing.
ParticipantFLU – They aren’t called “realtor-chicks” for nothing.
-
AuthorPosts
