[blahblahblah]

[quote=patb][quote=enron_by_the_sea]The Office of Defense Secretary Robert Gates issued a statement today saying that the mystery contrail seen in the skies off Los Angeles County late Monday came from an aircraft, not a missile, as many have speculated.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/09/norad-says-mystery-missile-not-attack/

Cover up ???? 🙂 :)[/quote]

I’d like to see some details
such as

1) FAA Surveillance radar shows no unexpected returns

2) Radar at Pt Mugu and Vandenberg shows no returns.

3) DSP satellite XX shows no unexpected signatures.

4) SOSUS and Acoustic sensors show no unexpected signatures.[/quote]

We don’t have those, but we do have the USA Notice to Mariners Nov. 6 2010.

*** On Page 55 ***

434/10(18).
EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC.
CALIFORNIA.
MISSILES.
1. INTERMITTENT MISSILE FIRING OPERATIONS 0001Z TO 2359Z
DAILY MONDAY THRU SUNDAY IN THE NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER
SEA RANGE. THE MAJORITY OF MISSILE FIRINGS TAKE PLACE
1400Z TO 2359Z AND 0001Z TO 0200Z DAILY MONDAY THRU FRIDAY
IN AREA BOUND BY
34-02N 119-04W, 33-52N 119-06W, 33-29N 118-37W,
33-20N 118-37W, 32-11N 120-16W, 31-54N 121-35W,
35-09N 123-39W, 35-29N 123-00W, 35-57N 121-32W,
34-04N 119-04W.
2. VESSELS MAY BE REQUESTED TO ALTER COURSE WITHIN THE ABOVE
AREA DUE TO FIRING OPERATIONS AND ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT
PLEAD CONTROL ON 5081.5 MHZ (5080 KHZ) OR 3238.5 KHZ (3237 KHZ)
SECONDARY OR 156.8 MHZ (CH 16) OR 127.55 MHZ BEFORE ENTERING
THE ABOVE BOUNDARIES AND MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS GUARD WHILE
WITHIN THE RANGE.
3. VESSELS INBOUND AND OUTBOUND FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PORTS
WILL CREATE THE LEAST INTERFERENCE TO FIRING OPERATIONS
DURING THE SPECIFIC PERIODS, AS WELL AS ENHANCE THE VESSEL’S
SAFETY WHEN PASSING THROUGH THE VICINITY OF THE SEA RANGE
IF THEY WILL TRANSIT VIA THE SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL AND WITHIN
NINE MILES OFFSHORE VICINITY OF POINT MUGU OR CROSS THE AREA
SOUTHWEST OF SAN NICOLAS ISLAND BETWEEN SUNSET AND SUNRISE.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=patb][quote=enron_by_the_sea]The Office of Defense Secretary Robert Gates issued a statement today saying that the mystery contrail seen in the skies off Los Angeles County late Monday came from an aircraft, not a missile, as many have speculated.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/09/norad-says-mystery-missile-not-attack/

Cover up ???? 🙂 :)[/quote]

I’d like to see some details
such as

1) FAA Surveillance radar shows no unexpected returns

2) Radar at Pt Mugu and Vandenberg shows no returns.

3) DSP satellite XX shows no unexpected signatures.

4) SOSUS and Acoustic sensors show no unexpected signatures.[/quote]

We don’t have those, but we do have the USA Notice to Mariners Nov. 6 2010.

*** On Page 55 ***

434/10(18).
EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC.
CALIFORNIA.
MISSILES.
1. INTERMITTENT MISSILE FIRING OPERATIONS 0001Z TO 2359Z
DAILY MONDAY THRU SUNDAY IN THE NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER
SEA RANGE. THE MAJORITY OF MISSILE FIRINGS TAKE PLACE
1400Z TO 2359Z AND 0001Z TO 0200Z DAILY MONDAY THRU FRIDAY
IN AREA BOUND BY
34-02N 119-04W, 33-52N 119-06W, 33-29N 118-37W,
33-20N 118-37W, 32-11N 120-16W, 31-54N 121-35W,
35-09N 123-39W, 35-29N 123-00W, 35-57N 121-32W,
34-04N 119-04W.
2. VESSELS MAY BE REQUESTED TO ALTER COURSE WITHIN THE ABOVE
AREA DUE TO FIRING OPERATIONS AND ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT
PLEAD CONTROL ON 5081.5 MHZ (5080 KHZ) OR 3238.5 KHZ (3237 KHZ)
SECONDARY OR 156.8 MHZ (CH 16) OR 127.55 MHZ BEFORE ENTERING
THE ABOVE BOUNDARIES AND MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS GUARD WHILE
WITHIN THE RANGE.
3. VESSELS INBOUND AND OUTBOUND FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PORTS
WILL CREATE THE LEAST INTERFERENCE TO FIRING OPERATIONS
DURING THE SPECIFIC PERIODS, AS WELL AS ENHANCE THE VESSEL’S
SAFETY WHEN PASSING THROUGH THE VICINITY OF THE SEA RANGE
IF THEY WILL TRANSIT VIA THE SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL AND WITHIN
NINE MILES OFFSHORE VICINITY OF POINT MUGU OR CROSS THE AREA
SOUTHWEST OF SAN NICOLAS ISLAND BETWEEN SUNSET AND SUNRISE.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]

Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.

Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!

[blahblahblah]

[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]

Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.

Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!

[blahblahblah]

[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]

Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.

Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!

[blahblahblah]

[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]

Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.

Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!

[blahblahblah]

[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]

Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.

Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!

[blahblahblah]

If you believe the government inflation numbers then you’re probably still tuning in to Fox News every day to see if they’ve found the weapons of mass destruction.

[blahblahblah]

If you believe the government inflation numbers then you’re probably still tuning in to Fox News every day to see if they’ve found the weapons of mass destruction.

[blahblahblah]

If you believe the government inflation numbers then you’re probably still tuning in to Fox News every day to see if they’ve found the weapons of mass destruction.

[blahblahblah]

If you believe the government inflation numbers then you’re probably still tuning in to Fox News every day to see if they’ve found the weapons of mass destruction.

[blahblahblah]

If you believe the government inflation numbers then you’re probably still tuning in to Fox News every day to see if they’ve found the weapons of mass destruction.

[blahblahblah]

It wasn’t the Vandenberg launch, that was Nov. 5. This one was last night (Nov. 8). More info here.

The best case is that this was a Polaris missile test. The worst case is that someone was testing a Club K container missile system.

[blahblahblah]

It wasn’t the Vandenberg launch, that was Nov. 5. This one was last night (Nov. 8). More info here.

The best case is that this was a Polaris missile test. The worst case is that someone was testing a Club K container missile system.

[blahblahblah]

It wasn’t the Vandenberg launch, that was Nov. 5. This one was last night (Nov. 8). More info here.

The best case is that this was a Polaris missile test. The worst case is that someone was testing a Club K container missile system.

[Author]

Posts