Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone have experience in building a “Hackintosh”, please PM me. #444226August 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone have experience in building a “Hackintosh”, please PM me. #444420
BGinRB
Participant[quote=afx114][quote=dbapig]You should look into CentOS. Not as bleeding edge as FC but pretty good. It’s basically free version of Red Hat Enterprise.[/quote]
Yep, we went to CentOS after Fedora dropped support/updates on a few of our FC web boxes. CentOS has been great so far. The only bummer is they go the opposite direction — a bit too conservative. For example, they ship/update to PHP 5.1, even though 5.2 has been out since 2006! I had to use a 3rd party repo to get it up to 5.2. So it’s a trade-off in each direction.[/quote]
I second CentOS as a production environment. And recommend PHP 5.3. If namespaces, late static binding and and closures are not convincing enough the introduction of labels will seal the deal.
August 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone have experience in building a “Hackintosh”, please PM me. #444757Participant[quote=afx114][quote=dbapig]You should look into CentOS. Not as bleeding edge as FC but pretty good. It’s basically free version of Red Hat Enterprise.[/quote]
Yep, we went to CentOS after Fedora dropped support/updates on a few of our FC web boxes. CentOS has been great so far. The only bummer is they go the opposite direction — a bit too conservative. For example, they ship/update to PHP 5.1, even though 5.2 has been out since 2006! I had to use a 3rd party repo to get it up to 5.2. So it’s a trade-off in each direction.[/quote]
I second CentOS as a production environment. And recommend PHP 5.3. If namespaces, late static binding and and closures are not convincing enough the introduction of labels will seal the deal.
August 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone have experience in building a “Hackintosh”, please PM me. #444825Participant[quote=afx114][quote=dbapig]You should look into CentOS. Not as bleeding edge as FC but pretty good. It’s basically free version of Red Hat Enterprise.[/quote]
Yep, we went to CentOS after Fedora dropped support/updates on a few of our FC web boxes. CentOS has been great so far. The only bummer is they go the opposite direction — a bit too conservative. For example, they ship/update to PHP 5.1, even though 5.2 has been out since 2006! I had to use a 3rd party repo to get it up to 5.2. So it’s a trade-off in each direction.[/quote]
I second CentOS as a production environment. And recommend PHP 5.3. If namespaces, late static binding and and closures are not convincing enough the introduction of labels will seal the deal.
August 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone have experience in building a “Hackintosh”, please PM me. #445004Participant[quote=afx114][quote=dbapig]You should look into CentOS. Not as bleeding edge as FC but pretty good. It’s basically free version of Red Hat Enterprise.[/quote]
Yep, we went to CentOS after Fedora dropped support/updates on a few of our FC web boxes. CentOS has been great so far. The only bummer is they go the opposite direction — a bit too conservative. For example, they ship/update to PHP 5.1, even though 5.2 has been out since 2006! I had to use a 3rd party repo to get it up to 5.2. So it’s a trade-off in each direction.[/quote]
I second CentOS as a production environment. And recommend PHP 5.3. If namespaces, late static binding and and closures are not convincing enough the introduction of labels will seal the deal.
Participant[quote=Eugene]I don’t get it.
So, if you’re a congressman, and you receive a donation from someone, and that someone turns out to be a crook 10 years later, you deserve to be voted out of Congress, is that the logic?[/quote]
Only if you are the crook’s sponsor.
Participant[quote=Eugene]I don’t get it.
So, if you’re a congressman, and you receive a donation from someone, and that someone turns out to be a crook 10 years later, you deserve to be voted out of Congress, is that the logic?[/quote]
Only if you are the crook’s sponsor.
Participant[quote=Eugene]I don’t get it.
So, if you’re a congressman, and you receive a donation from someone, and that someone turns out to be a crook 10 years later, you deserve to be voted out of Congress, is that the logic?[/quote]
Only if you are the crook’s sponsor.
Participant[quote=Eugene]I don’t get it.
So, if you’re a congressman, and you receive a donation from someone, and that someone turns out to be a crook 10 years later, you deserve to be voted out of Congress, is that the logic?[/quote]
Only if you are the crook’s sponsor.
Participant[quote=Eugene]I don’t get it.
So, if you’re a congressman, and you receive a donation from someone, and that someone turns out to be a crook 10 years later, you deserve to be voted out of Congress, is that the logic?[/quote]
Only if you are the crook’s sponsor.
ParticipantYou can always present the findings and ask the seller compensate for the deficiencies you found. After all, you will have to disclose the issues when you try to sell the place and it will cost you. Some people will not purchase a house with cured structural issues.
In general, if you want to bargain you need to be ready to walk away.
ParticipantYou can always present the findings and ask the seller compensate for the deficiencies you found. After all, you will have to disclose the issues when you try to sell the place and it will cost you. Some people will not purchase a house with cured structural issues.
In general, if you want to bargain you need to be ready to walk away.
ParticipantYou can always present the findings and ask the seller compensate for the deficiencies you found. After all, you will have to disclose the issues when you try to sell the place and it will cost you. Some people will not purchase a house with cured structural issues.
In general, if you want to bargain you need to be ready to walk away.
ParticipantYou can always present the findings and ask the seller compensate for the deficiencies you found. After all, you will have to disclose the issues when you try to sell the place and it will cost you. Some people will not purchase a house with cured structural issues.
In general, if you want to bargain you need to be ready to walk away.
ParticipantYou can always present the findings and ask the seller compensate for the deficiencies you found. After all, you will have to disclose the issues when you try to sell the place and it will cost you. Some people will not purchase a house with cured structural issues.
In general, if you want to bargain you need to be ready to walk away.
-
AuthorPosts
