[BGinRB]

[quote=jpinpb]Need a username and password to sign in to your link[/quote]

You can register, it is free.

Ray, it sold to a 3rd party for $358,100.00.
What is confusing you?
With fidelityasap, if it says ‘sold’, it got sold to a 3rd party.
If there was no buyer it says ‘back to bene’.
‘Cancelled’ – cured or more likely short sale that went through.

[BGinRB]

[quote=jpinpb]Need a username and password to sign in to your link[/quote]

You can register, it is free.

Ray, it sold to a 3rd party for $358,100.00.
What is confusing you?
With fidelityasap, if it says ‘sold’, it got sold to a 3rd party.
If there was no buyer it says ‘back to bene’.
‘Cancelled’ – cured or more likely short sale that went through.

[BGinRB]

[quote=jpinpb]Need a username and password to sign in to your link[/quote]

You can register, it is free.

Ray, it sold to a 3rd party for $358,100.00.
What is confusing you?
With fidelityasap, if it says ‘sold’, it got sold to a 3rd party.
If there was no buyer it says ‘back to bene’.
‘Cancelled’ – cured or more likely short sale that went through.

[BGinRB]

[quote=jpinpb]Need a username and password to sign in to your link[/quote]

You can register, it is free.

Ray, it sold to a 3rd party for $358,100.00.
What is confusing you?
With fidelityasap, if it says ‘sold’, it got sold to a 3rd party.
If there was no buyer it says ‘back to bene’.
‘Cancelled’ – cured or more likely short sale that went through.

[BGinRB]

[quote=jpinpb]Need a username and password to sign in to your link[/quote]

You can register, it is free.

Ray, it sold to a 3rd party for $358,100.00.
What is confusing you?
With fidelityasap, if it says ‘sold’, it got sold to a 3rd party.
If there was no buyer it says ‘back to bene’.
‘Cancelled’ – cured or more likely short sale that went through.

[BGinRB]

Ox is recently divorced with a girlfriend, no?

Would you offer as much if you knew about the issues? If you are competing with another 11 people and some are really 100% cash (you don’t know unless you are the seller, do you?) it is likely that your initial offer was too high to begin with.

Are you using the guy who helped you sell the house, a different one or you went straight to the listing agent?

[BGinRB]

Ox is recently divorced with a girlfriend, no?

Would you offer as much if you knew about the issues? If you are competing with another 11 people and some are really 100% cash (you don’t know unless you are the seller, do you?) it is likely that your initial offer was too high to begin with.

Are you using the guy who helped you sell the house, a different one or you went straight to the listing agent?

[BGinRB]

Ox is recently divorced with a girlfriend, no?

Would you offer as much if you knew about the issues? If you are competing with another 11 people and some are really 100% cash (you don’t know unless you are the seller, do you?) it is likely that your initial offer was too high to begin with.

Are you using the guy who helped you sell the house, a different one or you went straight to the listing agent?

[BGinRB]

Ox is recently divorced with a girlfriend, no?

Would you offer as much if you knew about the issues? If you are competing with another 11 people and some are really 100% cash (you don’t know unless you are the seller, do you?) it is likely that your initial offer was too high to begin with.

Are you using the guy who helped you sell the house, a different one or you went straight to the listing agent?

[BGinRB]

Ox is recently divorced with a girlfriend, no?

Would you offer as much if you knew about the issues? If you are competing with another 11 people and some are really 100% cash (you don’t know unless you are the seller, do you?) it is likely that your initial offer was too high to begin with.

Are you using the guy who helped you sell the house, a different one or you went straight to the listing agent?

[BGinRB]

[quote=pencilneck]UT: Dip in property-tax defaults delights county’s collector
http://tiny.cc/JbECl

Did anyone see this article in today’s UT? I’m baffled by the increase in the amounts of tax due. I’m wondering if anyone could help explain how property taxes due more than tripled since 2005?

These figures don’t include outstanding dues from prior years which would have been my first guess.

Also, remember those blaming California’s budget woes on prop. 13? Farcical.

As of | Amount due | Percent | July 1 (in millions) late

2009: $168 |.43 | 3.7

2008: $168 |.63 | 3.8

2007: $112 | .9 | 2.8

2006: $71 | .3 | 2.0

2005: $50 | .8 | 1.6[/quote]

The chart is messed up.

It should look like this:

As of | Amount due | Percent
2009 | $168.4 | 3.7
2008 | $168.6 | 3.8
2007 | $112.9 | 2.8
2006 | $71.3 | 2.0
2005 | $50.8 | 1.6

David Butler is one of my favorites. What was that thing about getting a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it?
In Butler’s case make it a double.

[BGinRB]

[quote=pencilneck]UT: Dip in property-tax defaults delights county’s collector
http://tiny.cc/JbECl

Did anyone see this article in today’s UT? I’m baffled by the increase in the amounts of tax due. I’m wondering if anyone could help explain how property taxes due more than tripled since 2005?

These figures don’t include outstanding dues from prior years which would have been my first guess.

Also, remember those blaming California’s budget woes on prop. 13? Farcical.

As of | Amount due | Percent | July 1 (in millions) late

2009: $168 |.43 | 3.7

2008: $168 |.63 | 3.8

2007: $112 | .9 | 2.8

2006: $71 | .3 | 2.0

2005: $50 | .8 | 1.6[/quote]

The chart is messed up.

It should look like this:

As of | Amount due | Percent
2009 | $168.4 | 3.7
2008 | $168.6 | 3.8
2007 | $112.9 | 2.8
2006 | $71.3 | 2.0
2005 | $50.8 | 1.6

David Butler is one of my favorites. What was that thing about getting a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it?
In Butler’s case make it a double.

[BGinRB]

[quote=pencilneck]UT: Dip in property-tax defaults delights county’s collector
http://tiny.cc/JbECl

Did anyone see this article in today’s UT? I’m baffled by the increase in the amounts of tax due. I’m wondering if anyone could help explain how property taxes due more than tripled since 2005?

These figures don’t include outstanding dues from prior years which would have been my first guess.

Also, remember those blaming California’s budget woes on prop. 13? Farcical.

As of | Amount due | Percent | July 1 (in millions) late

2009: $168 |.43 | 3.7

2008: $168 |.63 | 3.8

2007: $112 | .9 | 2.8

2006: $71 | .3 | 2.0

2005: $50 | .8 | 1.6[/quote]

The chart is messed up.

It should look like this:

As of | Amount due | Percent
2009 | $168.4 | 3.7
2008 | $168.6 | 3.8
2007 | $112.9 | 2.8
2006 | $71.3 | 2.0
2005 | $50.8 | 1.6

David Butler is one of my favorites. What was that thing about getting a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it?
In Butler’s case make it a double.

[BGinRB]

[quote=pencilneck]UT: Dip in property-tax defaults delights county’s collector
http://tiny.cc/JbECl

Did anyone see this article in today’s UT? I’m baffled by the increase in the amounts of tax due. I’m wondering if anyone could help explain how property taxes due more than tripled since 2005?

These figures don’t include outstanding dues from prior years which would have been my first guess.

Also, remember those blaming California’s budget woes on prop. 13? Farcical.

As of | Amount due | Percent | July 1 (in millions) late

2009: $168 |.43 | 3.7

2008: $168 |.63 | 3.8

2007: $112 | .9 | 2.8

2006: $71 | .3 | 2.0

2005: $50 | .8 | 1.6[/quote]

The chart is messed up.

It should look like this:

As of | Amount due | Percent
2009 | $168.4 | 3.7
2008 | $168.6 | 3.8
2007 | $112.9 | 2.8
2006 | $71.3 | 2.0
2005 | $50.8 | 1.6

David Butler is one of my favorites. What was that thing about getting a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it?
In Butler’s case make it a double.

[BGinRB]

[quote=pencilneck]UT: Dip in property-tax defaults delights county’s collector
http://tiny.cc/JbECl

Did anyone see this article in today’s UT? I’m baffled by the increase in the amounts of tax due. I’m wondering if anyone could help explain how property taxes due more than tripled since 2005?

These figures don’t include outstanding dues from prior years which would have been my first guess.

Also, remember those blaming California’s budget woes on prop. 13? Farcical.

As of | Amount due | Percent | July 1 (in millions) late

2009: $168 |.43 | 3.7

2008: $168 |.63 | 3.8

2007: $112 | .9 | 2.8

2006: $71 | .3 | 2.0

2005: $50 | .8 | 1.6[/quote]

The chart is messed up.

It should look like this:

As of | Amount due | Percent
2009 | $168.4 | 3.7
2008 | $168.6 | 3.8
2007 | $112.9 | 2.8
2006 | $71.3 | 2.0
2005 | $50.8 | 1.6

David Butler is one of my favorites. What was that thing about getting a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it?
In Butler’s case make it a double.

[Author]

Posts