[bearishgurl]

I’m against accessory dwelling units unless the property owner has minimum 1/4 AC lot, alley access (or both). Many residential streets in SD County are already too crowded because there are too many drivers living in one house as well as too few houses which actually have an empty-enough garage to park in. The street parking is already terrible and in neighborhoods with <=5K sf lots, there is barely enough room in front of each house to park one vehicle on the street (w/o blocking driveways). There are too many adult children (extra drivers) still living with mom and dad and many people buy way too many vehicles .... more than they have any business owning because they don't have the land (OR usable garage) to store them on or in. The ideal accessory dwelling unit in SD has an alley-facing garage or carport. That's the best situation which won't be a headache to the neighbors.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=SK in CV]LOL! Great points. Long memories, just not very good ones. After three separate inquiries, investigators could find no evidence of wrongdoing by Clinton in the Whitewater controversy. The FBI isn’t doing the “right thing” now. It’s doing the possibly illegal thing, which will probably lead to the end of James Comey’s career. Fortunately, we won’t have to listen to lies from the republican candidate much longer. Trump is still losing. Badly. And Bigly.[/quote]Actually, I recently saw a few minutes ago that Trump was ahead 3.5% in your DEEP RED state of AZ (in a 4-way race). Not sure why HRC has chosen to waste her precious, short time in your great city today since Obamacare is going up 116% for 2017 and you now only have ONE carrier left . . . a very sad state of affairs for Phonecians under the age of 65 who don’t have employer (or government) provided healthcare :=0

Director Comey could have no doubt have retired yesterday. And he may yet do so. Of course, it likely depends on who his new boss ends up to be :-]

And then there is the “fat lady” again. Remember her? She’s warming up her pipes for her performance, starting tomorrow. May the show go on!

[bearishgurl]

[quote=JAFO]Hillary should be in jail. Just the fact that 32,000 emails were deleted after being subpoenaed should be enough. I lived through the White Water scandal. Bill Clinton trying to define the word ‘is’. He was a disgrace to the presidency. You watch as DNC vice chair feeds the Clinton campaign upcoming questions. It is all so discouraging. And then you see how the Clinton followers just do not give a shit about anything the Clinton clan does. I really do not get it. Boggles the mind. Clinton is a career politician that really hasn’t done crap in the 30 years of ‘serving’. Screw all career politicians.

Trump is not a career politician. He isn’t lying and cheating to win. Yes, he puts his foot in his mouth. He’s a human being. I think his heart is in the right place. He gets my vote. I’d rather give him a chance than endure four more years of a Clinton.[/quote]Well said, JAFO. I have a lo-o-o-ong memory of the Clinton clan and their shenanigans (and accompanying baggage) as well. I also have peeps who have lived their entire lives in Bill’s home state of AR who have longer memories than I do :=0 They saw the Hill/Bill (yes, in that order) comedy of errors play out up close and personal for a far longer portion of their lives than they would have wished.

I’m a woman and I would like to see a woman president before I die but just not HER. Everything that is now momentarily playing out in the airwaves has all been done before in all levels of Democratic candidates and by Democrats in positions of power in every level of government.

As a registered Dem since the Reagan era and former local Dem activist, I’ve seen it all before multiple times and I get it. I can (and have) predict(ed) here what will happen next. What we’re now seeing is “textbook” for the folks who have taken the class. Glad to see that the FBI has finally (at the 11th hour) decided to do the right thing but not sure that it will affect the election due to the Dem’s HUGE and organized ground game (of which I used to be a part of many years ago). The jury is still out on that one.

Trump’s doing great in his swing state rallies and I pray that he takes the state of FL. I predict he also takes NV and AZ and feel he has a good chance in CO. I don’t know much about the demographics and culture of the other swing states but his rallies are well-attended everywhere with enthusiastic supporters. We’ll soon have our answers.

Unfortunately, voters in behemoth CA will continue to deliver their electoral votes to the Dems. Generally, CA’s voters haven’t (collectively) voted in their best interests for over three decades. Everything here is simply hunky dory and a “monkey-see, monkey know nothing” attitude prevails amongst CA’s voters . . . with the actual reality possibly masked by our great weather and numerous “gated communities” among other diversions we enjoy that other (less fortunate) states, don’t :=0

[bearishgurl]

[quote=FlyerInHi][quote=bearishgurl]For all you “techies” who feel threatened by a Trump presidency, how would you like to see all the “deplorables” from flyover America pack up their station wagons, pickups, and now “U-Hauls” (like they did in the 1940’s) and hightail it to coastal CA and triple up in housing and start applying for jobs? I have no doubt that a large portion of them have college degrees in the various IT specialties.

Why shouldn’t this massive group have living-wage jobs to choose from in their own locales? Why should the vast bulk living-wage jobs in America be concentrated on the West Coast and Eastern Seaboard?

These people are Americans (hundreds of thousands of them are Native Americans, btw). Don’t they deserve to make a respectable living (as YOU do) in their own regions??

The landscape of the US has literally been (financially) “hollowed out” by NAFTA. This doesn’t bode well for any American citizen …. not even the coastal dwellers.[/quote]

Did you say before that, notwithstanding their lack of college education, Trump supporters are doing well in flyover country. They have paid off houses, vacation homes at the lake, toys galore and plenty of savings for retirement.

They should be happy. What are they bitching about? Please give us a list of their grievances, if any.[/quote]I’ve posted here that my OWN peeps are doing well. They are ALL boomers …. plus 3 WWII/silents and 3 Greatest Gen (age 82-90) left. THEY are the ones with the defined benefit pensions, eligible for Medicare (most of them) and bought up residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural land when it was dirt cheap (in America’s former “dust bowl”). THEY are the ones who have inherited quarterly lease and royalty payments from gas and oil activities appurtenant to parcels they inherited. THEY are the ones who are living like your description, above, brian.

Their GenX and millenial kids and grandkids …. um, not so much. Only 2 of them that I know of managed to get fantastic-paying jobs in the oil fields with Halliburton. They are gone from home probably 48 weeks per year (off and on). One of them has already paid off he and his elementary-schoolteacher spouse’s fixer-upper 75 year-old house they bought 3 years ago and is still away from her and their new baby 48 weeks per year working in any one of six states. Oilfield workers can’t spend their whole lives at those jobs because their bodies will wear out and they are isolated much of the time. Much like fashion modeling, these young workers must attempt to qualify for these jobs while they’re 18-20 years old and work them as long as the employer will have them and save all their earnings for homes and to get themselves established. (Halliburton prefers to hire big, strong young men.) The other young man (age 27) working for Halliburton in the oil fields has already paid off two brand new vehicles and is in the process of buying a house. He is also gone 48 weeks per year. One more young man (age 28) had the good fortune to become a CPA and was immediately courted (and hired) by Big Oil upon his graduation from college with a degree in accountancy. The rest of my Gen X/millenial peeps are only still there after HS/College graduation because their boomer and beyond parents subdivided their land, gave them a parcel for a house and even gave them ranch land or other (leased) land with agricultural enterprises on it to work and manage (some of my peeps were getting too old to work all of it). Other general contractors in the family built them houses on those parcels with a very thin profit margin and the construction loans were cosigned by the boomer parents and held until their kids could qualify for a take-out mortgage. If my peeps didn’t do this, their kids would have moved to distant cities which had better wages and taken their children (the grandchildren) with them.

Without a lot of family help to get established, a lot of working-age adults in these flyover states couldn’t make it. Even schoolteacher starting pay there is just over 50% of what it is in coastal CA. All the former living-wage manufacturing jobs in the area and in some cases, even the entire state are gone. Some small towns have been turned into ghost towns when the ONE large employer there closed up shop causing nearly all the residents to eventually flee to places where they could earn a living.

The “golden age of opportunity” (experienced by my generation and above) has been over for the last ~20 years (depending on locale). There is no longer a guarantee of a lifetime job if one performs well and defined benefit pensions are almost non-existent. A HS graduate from a state where its industry has been hollowed out by NAFTA faces a double whammy. Not only MUST they leave home for a post-secondary education or training after HS graduation (and pay for housing to do so as well as borrow for school if their parents couldn’t help), they must often accept their first FT job after graduation far away from their hometowns in order to be able to make any respectable living at all …. or join the military (and many do). There is often nothing at all left for them within an ~80-mile radius of their hometown except scanty minimum wage positions. Even then, the (secondary) city closest to their hometowns doesn’t even have any industry left which pays a living wage.

There is a huge swath of our country which suffers from obsolescence due to large manufacturers who fled the region. What do you expect the affected inhabitants to do if they need a good job and can’t find one and they’re dead broke but living in the only environment they have ever known (near their families)?

[bearishgurl]

For all you “techies” who feel threatened by a Trump presidency, how would you like to see all the “deplorables” from flyover America pack up their station wagons, pickups, and now “U-Hauls” (like they did in the 1940’s) and hightail it to coastal CA and triple up in housing and start applying for jobs? I have no doubt that a large portion of them have college degrees in the various IT specialties.

Why shouldn’t this massive group have living-wage jobs to choose from in their own locales? Why should the vast bulk living-wage jobs in America be concentrated on the West Coast and Eastern Seaboard?

These people are Americans (hundreds of thousands of them are Native Americans, btw). Don’t they deserve to make a respectable living (as YOU do) in their own regions??

The landscape of the US has literally been (financially) “hollowed out” by NAFTA. This doesn’t bode well for any American citizen …. not even the coastal dwellers.

[bearishgurl]

I find it puzzling that flu/flu-redux/fat_lazy_union/bullishgurl keeps bringing up here that he is “concerned” that should Trump become president, he will send back to their own countries the H1-B’s who are already sponsored by US employers. Yes, I could see Trump stemming the tide of future H1B’s but I don’t see him trying to deport ANY law-abiding LEGAL resident from another country who is currently working FT in the US and paying their own way (and paying taxes). There is nothing in Trump’s words or written policies on his website that indicates he plans to do this. I don’t know where flu is getting his info.

flu, you are an American citizen, no? Were you not born in the US? Aren’t your spouse and kid(s) American citizens? What exactly are you afraid of should we have a Trump presidency?

[bearishgurl]

[quote=guitar187][quote=SK in CV][quote=no_such_reality]Can you imagine the shit storm if Comey didn’t CYA and then Congress or the Media learned there was Clinton emails on the Weiner computer?

If it’s just unclassified missives between Huda and Clinton, that’s nobody’s business. If a single one of them is Classified, that’s the whole point. Clinton’s handling of classified info was so lax that it ended up on a computer Anthony Weiner used for sexting with a minor.

Do I think that means we should elect Trump, no.

I’ll gladly take four more years of Elon Musk’s ilk bilking the system than subjecting ourselves to egocentric trepidation of the balding Oompa.

Sadly the 66% that like neither can’t seem to look for any less unlikable out of fear that the more unlikable one will win.[/quote]

FBI sources have already acknowledged that none of the emails in question were sent by Clinton. In which case, practically speaking, there can’t really be a finding that Clinton mishandled classified information. Nor could it possibly have anything to do with the investigation into the use of her private server.

This was a purely political move on Comey’s part to issue the statement, even if it wasn’t partisan. There is no possible non-political purpose in issuing the statement. None. (Trying to appear non-political IS a political move.)[/quote]

That’s completely untrue. I’m not taking sides, but just because the email was not sent by Clinton does not mean it was not mishandled and/or has no association with her private server. That fails a basic logic test in countless scenarios.[/quote]Agree. Clinton is a YALE-TRAINED LAWYER who has held two high public offices. The buck stops with HER. SHE is in charge of ALL of HER staff and ALL the manipulations of the electronic communications on HER behalf that she tasked them with. SHE is where is is today because of HER negligence and/or HER purposeful non-cooperation with the FBI.

Huma and her loser scumbag “estranged spouse” will SAVE THEMSELVES FIRST …. yes, even if it means outing Clinton. Can we blame them? I’ve seen ALL of these shenanigans (and more) go down multiple times in much lower gubment agencies. It’s par for the course. The once joined-at-the-hip Clintons and the Weiners are finished.

The “fat lady” has now entered backstage, folks, where she will get a makeup touch-up and her costume adjusted. She will begin singing her sets between this coming Thursday and Saturday. Stay tuned . . .

[bearishgurl]

[quote=FlyerInHi]BG, if your position is consistent with the law, then work with what we have now. Stop advocating for tax increases to shore up pensions.

If you want to change laws to increase property taxes, then I can equally advocate changes to force pensioners to take less. Trump’s position is to force creditors to take less because you can. I would love to put Trump in charge of a bankrupt municipality.[/quote]Where did you get the idea I ever advocated for tax increases? My particular pension fund IS “shored up.” It was done by creating another lower (more scantily benefited) retirement tier for unvested recent hires.

I’ve always been willing to work within the law. Yeah, I don’t agree with the passage of Props 58 and 193 but I don’t see how they can be successfully repealed, given the “voter class” in CA all expect gubment largesse for themselves. It’s been that way ever since I can remember.

CA property owners with ultra low assessments likely outnumber those who have market rate assessments (or close to it). And, due to the existence of Props 58/193, the “ultra-low assessment group” is growing larger every single month.

[bearishgurl]

It appears the MSM has now latched on with the teeth of a pit bull all the (incestuous) Anthony/Huma/Hillary/Bill connections in this sad saga which I previously posted here and which could very well sink the Clinton campaign … in short order. It will be interesting to see if the FBI makes any more public statements in the coming days.

I predict Huma will not come back to the campaign trail …. nor should she. HRC certainly doesn’t need the distraction.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=njtosd][quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd]
Once again, BG, you have misquoted me by adding emphasis where there was none. It really riles me – I have explained on a couple of occasions now in painfully clear terms that I resent your misrepresentations. So have other people. Stop it.[/quote]nj, you’re certainly free to tell the Piggs what you meant by this phrase you posted:

[quote=njtosd]…Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives. …[/quote]

Instead of berating me for giving MY opinion, why don’t you give yours? What exactly did to mean by the [bolded] phrase?[/quote]

All right – I understand you’re not so bright, but this shouldn’t be difficult. It is my choice to express what I think and to emphasize one point over another if I choose to. Do not change what I write. I don’t need to explain myself to you upon demand. Speak for yourself – you’ve done a lot of that already.[/quote]Good L@rd, I never thought I would actually agree with SK on this issue but those are YOUR words (above). No one has changed anything you have written. How did you expect your words to be interpreted, especially since you are apparently unwilling to clarify them?

Absolutely amazing …. :-0

[bearishgurl]

[quote=flu] . . . No wonder this country is going down the tubes….No one wants to really work and make hard choices anymore.[/quote]Got a question for you, flu. Do you intend to work FT when you’re 55? What about at age 60? How about 65??

[bearishgurl]

[quote=harvey] . . . Brian mentioned renegotiating contracts – something Trump advocates as one of his strengths – and pointed out that that BG’s support for Trump is inconsistent with her position on pension policy. A reasonable and valid observation. . . . [/quote]It’s not “inconsistent.” I have no idea if NAFTA contracts are renegotiable as I don’t know anything about NAFTA law. I know it is part of Trump’s platform, but that is not why I support him. Whether or not he is successful in doing that (should he win the election), it won’t bring any more jobs back to SD County. We didn’t lose any jobs to China or MX. Your reading comprehension must be lacking, pri_dk. I’ve posted here numerous times that I’m a “single-issue voter” in this election. I want obamacare repealed and replaced yesterday. If a border wall is actually successfully completed in a Trump Administration, that would icing on the cake (and especially a big boon to CA’s finances).

HOWEVER, I DO know a thing or two about public pension law in CA. There HAVE been municipal bankruptcies in CA filed in recent years. Ask yourself how those cases turned out. I didn’t bother to check on PACER to peruse these cases but if the following articles are any indication, these cities’ pensioners didn’t give up a penny of their pensions after their cities went BK and some of them had to give up part or all of their healthcare allowances as retiree healthcare (or HC allowances) aren’t part of many public union contracts and if they are, they aren’t guaranteed (under certain conditions) by CA law.

http://www.newsmax.com/US/bankruptcy-vallejo-california/2013/10/01/id/528659/

http://www.sbsun.com/government-and-politics/20150514/san-bernardino-plans-huge-reductions-in-bankruptcy-plan

http://www.stocktongov.com/files/2_4_2015_Chapter9_Doc1873_JudgeKleinOpinionConfirmationCalPERSstatus.pdf

It appears from the first article that City of Vallejo had to refile for BK two years after conclusion of their first BK case because they were still having problems meeting their pension obligations (small city). However, they will NOT be attempting to renegotiate with their retirement assn(s) in their refile because they KNOW they won’t be successful. City will cut more fat out of current employees’ benefits and more retirement benefits from its yet unvested workers to continue to meet its obligations until such time as its pensioners (pensioners at the time of its first BK filing) all pass away.

My position on (CA) public pension policy is consistent with the law. And so are all the BK judge’s positions on this subject. pri_dk, I’ve given you (and NSR and several others here) the opportunity to lobby your representatives to bring forth legislation which chips away at this body of law. You’ve had YEARS now to do so, yet you are still complaining. I literally spoon-fed you and your anti-public pension brethren on this board more than enough statutes to get you started on developing a cogent conversation with your representative(s) in effort to convince them to take action. You can’t blame ‘lil old me that CA public pensions are still in place after all these years when YOU failed to DO anything positive towards reform. Most of this body of law was already in place before I was even vested!

Your complaints on this subject are old news. It’s time to put up or shut up. Are you listening, phaster??

[bearishgurl]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=bearishgurl]SK, you must know that the FBI would not have stated that they were “reopening” (I know you don’t like to call it that but it fits) HRC’s investigation into her e-mail server unless they found some damning evidence on Huma’s laptop or phone. Like it or not, HRC, Huma (and as byproducts) Anthony and Bill are all interconnected. Two of them have been very close for ~20 years and the 4 of them were like One Big Happy Family. Bill actually married Huma and Anthony in 2010.

When one routinely rolls in the mud with their friends and “partners,” they will eventually get someone else’s dirt all over themselves. That’s how it works.[/quote]

The FBI didn’t say they were “reopening”, so no, it doesn’t fit. The FBI doesn’t close cases. They also said they don’t know what is in the emails. So if they don’t know, you can’t possibly even guess that they’re damning. More likely, it’s not the specific content of the emails, in fact, the FBI has acknowledged that all the emails they’re currently referring to (which may be as few as 3) could be emails they’ve already examined.

Weiner is a loser. Bill Clinton is one of the best past presidents the country has ever had. There is no evidence that Huma is anything but an outstanding employee and person. Secretary Clinton’s accomplishments speak for themselves. The dozens of scandals she’s been accused of are nothing more than empty accusations. So, I have no idea what “mud” you’re referring to. Based on your history here, best guess is you’re just making more shit up, so as to not look foolish again. Doesn’t really work very well.[/quote]SK, I’m puzzled at why you are constantly compelled to defend HRC on THIS forum. The bulk of the readers of this forum (90%?) live (and are registered to vote) in CA. Unlike your (adopted) home state of AZ, CA is a “deep blue” state. If every single illegal alien who (accidentally on purpose) was successfully registered to vote at HRC’s 70-80 “tabling events” held throughout the Golden state during the primary season, if wouldn’t matter as to the outcome on November 9. If +/- 2M nonresidents (using their “fake” US addresses at the time of registering to vote) actually made it across the border on 11/8 in a timely manner to pick up their Voter Guides and vote for HRC at their “assigned” SD County polling places, it wouldn’t matter. There are so many of the “liberal elite” residing within the state of CA who would vote against Trump even if Bozo the Clown was running against him on the Democratic ticket. Yes, even if 2M nonresidents successfully crossed the border on 11/8 and were able to successfully vote at their assigned “home polling places” in San Diego County, IT WOULDN’T MATTER as to the outcome of the election! I personally witnessed one event held on a Saturday morning in May of this year by Bill Clinton right here in Chula Vista (their “tabling event” was held IN SPANISH at the student theatre, in the rear of the HS campus). I personally cruised the HUGE student parking lot (as well as the adjacent parking lot of SWC that the rallygoers were using when the rally was already in progress). The verdict was that ~70% of the license plates of vehicles carrying people attending such rally were from …. (drumroll) …. Baja CA Norte. Is anyone surprised??

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/11/critics-predict-new-california-motor-voter-law-wil/

According to the (1/1/06) “CA Motor Voter Law,” illegal aliens can legally use a PO Box for an address on their new CA Driver Licenses (used to identify themselves as “CA residents for voter registration purposes) while US citizen residents must furnish a street address on their Driver License applications. The reasoning behind this decision is that is was “unfair” to require illegal aliens to furnish a bonafide street address to the DMV on their DL applications because many of them live on their employer’s land in employer-owned trailers (agricultural workers) and thus don’t have an actual street address of their own.

SK, you’re preaching to the choir here on Piggington whilst defending HRC at nearly every opportunity when you could be focused on your OWN RED STATE of AZ! Don’t you belong to any AZ blogs? You could be posting HRC’s “virtues” there instead of here and actually be “successful” in getting her more votes! This is sincerely coming from a former longtime DEM activist! I’ll readily admit that the electoral votes in CA will go to HRC and there is nothing ANYONE can do about that in this election cycle. The thousands of staunch “Dem activists” who reside in the nearly 10M-strong SF Bay area have seen to that. Oh, and you should know that they can (and will) travel! Hello, Nevada! There is no one on this board that knows this better than ME. I’m FROM the bay area, for G@d’s sake!

Sure, there are CA counties that have historically voted REP. Namely, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tuolumne and Yuba. HOWEVER, the VAST MAJORITY of the above counties DONT HAVE ENOUGH REGISTERED VOTERS IN THEM to even MATTER in the general election.

So there you have it. Let’s get down to brass tacks here. CA has been for many years and is now a DEEP BLUE STATE. The Trump campaign is NOT GOING TO SPEND A DIME in the Golden State, nor should they. So you don’t have to jump in here at every perceived opportunity and try to defend the undefensible. It is wholly unnecessary, especially at this late date … and the Piggs are smart enough to make up their own minds.

Like Michelle Obama stated on the campaign trail on behalf of her spouse, Barack, in 2007 (and in reference to HRC), “If you can’t run your own house, you certainly can’t run the White House.”

So true.

Doesn’t the AZ Republic have a blog or comments section? If so, are you registered for it? If not, why not? You would do well do get on it TOMORROW MORNING and start posting if you want to make a DIFFERENCE in this election. You’re wasting your time here.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=njtosd][quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd] . . . Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives . . .[/quote]That something else is an obvious codependency. Did Huma learn this behavior from her mentor, HRC, whom she has been attached to at the hip since she was an (impressionable) 19-20 years old? She had no shortage of very powerful executives as well as celebrities fawning all over her when she was a single up and coming politico! I can’t for the life of me understand what she saw in Weiner. But I digress ….

I note Huma isn’t traveling with HRC today. As it should be. She needs to go into hiding right now and schedule a “come to Jes*s convo” with her counsel in the coming week. The Clinton campaign can pay the retainer. She should also seek therapy asap on why she felt “trapped” into staying with “Mr. Danger” fully 5 years and 2 months past his “sell-by date” and have a baby with him in the interim, all the while being repeatedly humiliated by the relentless media fallout from his sordid “sexual phone forays.”

HRC well knew all of this and had to have known Huma was working at home and that her esteemed spouse, “Mr. Danger” was under investigation by the FBI over soliciting sexual favors from minors online and had seized his family’s computers and cell phones. Still …. she kept Huma on and didn’t bother to ask or see what State Dept matters might have been stored on her “right-hand woman’s” (now seized) computer or question her if she erased any of it before her computers were seized by the FBI. Huma was in charge of putting ALL of HRC’s e-mails into folders and/or moving them to other hard drives or the cloud. As such, HRC deserves all of the fallout she is getting. She is too careless with the safeguarding of US government e-mails, and as a byproduct, America’s secrets . . . yes, even at this late date. The buck stops with HER.[/quote]

Once again, BG, you have misquoted me by adding emphasis where there was none. It really riles me – I have explained on a couple of occasions now in painfully clear terms that I resent your misrepresentations. So have other people. Stop it.[/quote]nj, you’re certainly free to tell the Piggs what you meant by this phrase you posted:

[quote=njtosd]…Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives. …[/quote]

Instead of berating me for giving MY opinion, why don’t you give yours? What exactly did to mean by the [bolded] phrase?

[bearishgurl]

SK, you must know that the FBI would not have stated that they were “reopening” (I know you don’t like to call it that but it fits) HRC’s investigation into her e-mail server unless they found some damning evidence on Huma’s laptop or phone. Like it or not, HRC, Huma (and as byproducts) Anthony and Bill are all interconnected. Two of them have been very close for ~20 years and the 4 of them were like One Big Happy Family. Bill actually married Huma and Anthony in 2010.

When one routinely rolls in the mud with their friends and “partners,” they will eventually get someone else’s dirt all over themselves. That’s how it works.

[Author]

Posts