Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
barnaby33ParticipantWhile part of me agrees with Patb, part says stay away. The biggest problem with the financials (moreso than other stocks) is that the govt is directly picking the winners. I won’t fight the govt directly. There are other areas that are safer to short, even assuming M2M is suspended and we get a rally.
Joshbarnaby33ParticipantWhile part of me agrees with Patb, part says stay away. The biggest problem with the financials (moreso than other stocks) is that the govt is directly picking the winners. I won’t fight the govt directly. There are other areas that are safer to short, even assuming M2M is suspended and we get a rally.
Joshbarnaby33ParticipantWhy do you keep bringing up that nut job? He wasn’t the answer to anything, he was just bombastic. For a guy who’s been in the house as long as he has and sits on the house financial services committee, he’s had a chance to affect change. He didn’t do it. He talks a lot about financial austerity and the gold standard, but its all talk.
I’ve personally watched him have a golden chance to nail BERSPANKME to the wall in testimony (under oath) and he didn’t do it. The idea that he is somehow different is just ludicrous, or that he even understands the scope of the problem.
Joshbarnaby33ParticipantWhy do you keep bringing up that nut job? He wasn’t the answer to anything, he was just bombastic. For a guy who’s been in the house as long as he has and sits on the house financial services committee, he’s had a chance to affect change. He didn’t do it. He talks a lot about financial austerity and the gold standard, but its all talk.
I’ve personally watched him have a golden chance to nail BERSPANKME to the wall in testimony (under oath) and he didn’t do it. The idea that he is somehow different is just ludicrous, or that he even understands the scope of the problem.
Joshbarnaby33ParticipantWhy do you keep bringing up that nut job? He wasn’t the answer to anything, he was just bombastic. For a guy who’s been in the house as long as he has and sits on the house financial services committee, he’s had a chance to affect change. He didn’t do it. He talks a lot about financial austerity and the gold standard, but its all talk.
I’ve personally watched him have a golden chance to nail BERSPANKME to the wall in testimony (under oath) and he didn’t do it. The idea that he is somehow different is just ludicrous, or that he even understands the scope of the problem.
Joshbarnaby33ParticipantWhy do you keep bringing up that nut job? He wasn’t the answer to anything, he was just bombastic. For a guy who’s been in the house as long as he has and sits on the house financial services committee, he’s had a chance to affect change. He didn’t do it. He talks a lot about financial austerity and the gold standard, but its all talk.
I’ve personally watched him have a golden chance to nail BERSPANKME to the wall in testimony (under oath) and he didn’t do it. The idea that he is somehow different is just ludicrous, or that he even understands the scope of the problem.
Joshbarnaby33ParticipantWhy do you keep bringing up that nut job? He wasn’t the answer to anything, he was just bombastic. For a guy who’s been in the house as long as he has and sits on the house financial services committee, he’s had a chance to affect change. He didn’t do it. He talks a lot about financial austerity and the gold standard, but its all talk.
I’ve personally watched him have a golden chance to nail BERSPANKME to the wall in testimony (under oath) and he didn’t do it. The idea that he is somehow different is just ludicrous, or that he even understands the scope of the problem.
Joshbarnaby33ParticipantBy your logic Walmart is one large bailout. Sorry madmoney but this is not a bailout, its a negotiating tactic. You are on the losing end which is always hard, but customers demanding lower prices or leaving is not a bailout. Its not even new.
At some point its not worth the hassle and you’ll fire them, or the cost benefit analysis doesn’t work on their end and they leave. Finding the zone in between those two points is negotiation.
Josh
barnaby33ParticipantBy your logic Walmart is one large bailout. Sorry madmoney but this is not a bailout, its a negotiating tactic. You are on the losing end which is always hard, but customers demanding lower prices or leaving is not a bailout. Its not even new.
At some point its not worth the hassle and you’ll fire them, or the cost benefit analysis doesn’t work on their end and they leave. Finding the zone in between those two points is negotiation.
Josh
barnaby33ParticipantBy your logic Walmart is one large bailout. Sorry madmoney but this is not a bailout, its a negotiating tactic. You are on the losing end which is always hard, but customers demanding lower prices or leaving is not a bailout. Its not even new.
At some point its not worth the hassle and you’ll fire them, or the cost benefit analysis doesn’t work on their end and they leave. Finding the zone in between those two points is negotiation.
Josh
barnaby33ParticipantBy your logic Walmart is one large bailout. Sorry madmoney but this is not a bailout, its a negotiating tactic. You are on the losing end which is always hard, but customers demanding lower prices or leaving is not a bailout. Its not even new.
At some point its not worth the hassle and you’ll fire them, or the cost benefit analysis doesn’t work on their end and they leave. Finding the zone in between those two points is negotiation.
Josh
barnaby33ParticipantBy your logic Walmart is one large bailout. Sorry madmoney but this is not a bailout, its a negotiating tactic. You are on the losing end which is always hard, but customers demanding lower prices or leaving is not a bailout. Its not even new.
At some point its not worth the hassle and you’ll fire them, or the cost benefit analysis doesn’t work on their end and they leave. Finding the zone in between those two points is negotiation.
Josh
barnaby33ParticipantYeah it was a bit over the top. In his defense he says his analysis isn’t beholden to anyone that pays his salary. That made it worse to me. At least David Lereah was lying for a paycheck. Whats Gin’s excuse?
Joshbarnaby33ParticipantYeah it was a bit over the top. In his defense he says his analysis isn’t beholden to anyone that pays his salary. That made it worse to me. At least David Lereah was lying for a paycheck. Whats Gin’s excuse?
Josh -
AuthorPosts