[Artifact]

I don’t know if it was before, but they are calling it a short sale now as well.

At 527/square foot it is still pretty pricey based on the other houses listed for sale within a mile of it that are all under 500/sqft – one under 400. That doesn’t account for upgrades, view, etc, but it does make it look overpriced at the first casual glance.

[Artifact]

I don’t know if it was before, but they are calling it a short sale now as well.

At 527/square foot it is still pretty pricey based on the other houses listed for sale within a mile of it that are all under 500/sqft – one under 400. That doesn’t account for upgrades, view, etc, but it does make it look overpriced at the first casual glance.

[Artifact]

I don’t know if it was before, but they are calling it a short sale now as well.

At 527/square foot it is still pretty pricey based on the other houses listed for sale within a mile of it that are all under 500/sqft – one under 400. That doesn’t account for upgrades, view, etc, but it does make it look overpriced at the first casual glance.

[Artifact]

I don’t know if it was before, but they are calling it a short sale now as well.

At 527/square foot it is still pretty pricey based on the other houses listed for sale within a mile of it that are all under 500/sqft – one under 400. That doesn’t account for upgrades, view, etc, but it does make it look overpriced at the first casual glance.

[Artifact]

I don’t know if it was before, but they are calling it a short sale now as well.

At 527/square foot it is still pretty pricey based on the other houses listed for sale within a mile of it that are all under 500/sqft – one under 400. That doesn’t account for upgrades, view, etc, but it does make it look overpriced at the first casual glance.

[Artifact]

Here are side by side comparisons of 2007 and 2008 – I think now that we are looking at a second years worth of data this is more interesting than the time series. I think the percet change figure is still better plotted as an overall time series though.

NOTE: I plotted this as 52 weeks – for last year we had 3 weeks that sdr dared to be out on vacation – for those weeks I averaged the number from the preceding and following week to get a comparative value.

[img_assist|nid=6264|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]
[img_assist|nid=6265|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]

[Artifact]

Here are side by side comparisons of 2007 and 2008 – I think now that we are looking at a second years worth of data this is more interesting than the time series. I think the percet change figure is still better plotted as an overall time series though.

NOTE: I plotted this as 52 weeks – for last year we had 3 weeks that sdr dared to be out on vacation – for those weeks I averaged the number from the preceding and following week to get a comparative value.

[img_assist|nid=6264|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]
[img_assist|nid=6265|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]

[Artifact]

Here are side by side comparisons of 2007 and 2008 – I think now that we are looking at a second years worth of data this is more interesting than the time series. I think the percet change figure is still better plotted as an overall time series though.

NOTE: I plotted this as 52 weeks – for last year we had 3 weeks that sdr dared to be out on vacation – for those weeks I averaged the number from the preceding and following week to get a comparative value.

[img_assist|nid=6264|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]
[img_assist|nid=6265|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]

[Artifact]

Here are side by side comparisons of 2007 and 2008 – I think now that we are looking at a second years worth of data this is more interesting than the time series. I think the percet change figure is still better plotted as an overall time series though.

NOTE: I plotted this as 52 weeks – for last year we had 3 weeks that sdr dared to be out on vacation – for those weeks I averaged the number from the preceding and following week to get a comparative value.

[img_assist|nid=6264|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]
[img_assist|nid=6265|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]

[Artifact]

Here are side by side comparisons of 2007 and 2008 – I think now that we are looking at a second years worth of data this is more interesting than the time series. I think the percet change figure is still better plotted as an overall time series though.

NOTE: I plotted this as 52 weeks – for last year we had 3 weeks that sdr dared to be out on vacation – for those weeks I averaged the number from the preceding and following week to get a comparative value.

[img_assist|nid=6264|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]
[img_assist|nid=6265|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]

[Artifact]

Figures –

The last two updates are included – sorry for the delay. it looks like we have gone right back to the trend we saw most of last year…

I still want to change the first plot to overlay the years, but I just have not had time – I will try to do it today.

[img_assist|nid=6262|title= Short Sales and Total Listings|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]
[img_assist|nid=6263|title= Percent Change and Percent Short of Total|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]

[Artifact]

Figures –

The last two updates are included – sorry for the delay. it looks like we have gone right back to the trend we saw most of last year…

I still want to change the first plot to overlay the years, but I just have not had time – I will try to do it today.

[img_assist|nid=6262|title= Short Sales and Total Listings|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]
[img_assist|nid=6263|title= Percent Change and Percent Short of Total|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]

[Artifact]

Figures –

The last two updates are included – sorry for the delay. it looks like we have gone right back to the trend we saw most of last year…

I still want to change the first plot to overlay the years, but I just have not had time – I will try to do it today.

[img_assist|nid=6262|title= Short Sales and Total Listings|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]
[img_assist|nid=6263|title= Percent Change and Percent Short of Total|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]

[Artifact]

Figures –

The last two updates are included – sorry for the delay. it looks like we have gone right back to the trend we saw most of last year…

I still want to change the first plot to overlay the years, but I just have not had time – I will try to do it today.

[img_assist|nid=6262|title= Short Sales and Total Listings|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]
[img_assist|nid=6263|title= Percent Change and Percent Short of Total|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]

[Artifact]

Figures –

The last two updates are included – sorry for the delay. it looks like we have gone right back to the trend we saw most of last year…

I still want to change the first plot to overlay the years, but I just have not had time – I will try to do it today.

[img_assist|nid=6262|title= Short Sales and Total Listings|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]
[img_assist|nid=6263|title= Percent Change and Percent Short of Total|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=303]

[Author]

Posts