[Allan from Fallbrook]

Nost: Al Sharpton weighed in? Gosh, this must be serious.

Interesting, especially in that Tiger shrugged off the comments, saying that he understood it to be an inadvertent slip.

That was a damn funny movie, by the way. Struck a little too close to home in a lot of ways, though. Don’t have to drive very far in any one direction to find some alarming parallels.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Nost: Al Sharpton weighed in? Gosh, this must be serious.

Interesting, especially in that Tiger shrugged off the comments, saying that he understood it to be an inadvertent slip.

That was a damn funny movie, by the way. Struck a little too close to home in a lot of ways, though. Don’t have to drive very far in any one direction to find some alarming parallels.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Nost: Al Sharpton weighed in? Gosh, this must be serious.

Interesting, especially in that Tiger shrugged off the comments, saying that he understood it to be an inadvertent slip.

That was a damn funny movie, by the way. Struck a little too close to home in a lot of ways, though. Don’t have to drive very far in any one direction to find some alarming parallels.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Nost: Al Sharpton weighed in? Gosh, this must be serious.

Interesting, especially in that Tiger shrugged off the comments, saying that he understood it to be an inadvertent slip.

That was a damn funny movie, by the way. Struck a little too close to home in a lot of ways, though. Don’t have to drive very far in any one direction to find some alarming parallels.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: You have NO idea what I was going to say. That’s the beauty of free thinking, Bubba.

As Tigger would say: Ta ta for now.

Might want to throttle back on that Depakote.

[Author]

Posts