Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 24, 2008 at 3:29 PM in reply to: OT: The nail is on the coffin…UAW leader says no more concessions #308916November 24, 2008 at 2:47 PM in reply to: OT: The nail is on the coffin…UAW leader says no more concessions #308413
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantCE: Dude, what’s wrong with knowledge? Based on your handle, I’m guessing you’re an engineer. I thought you dudes are all about knowledge, and “working the problem”. C’mon, now.
It’s a good word, though. Especially for Che t-shirt wearing leftists.
November 24, 2008 at 2:47 PM in reply to: OT: The nail is on the coffin…UAW leader says no more concessions #308783Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantCE: Dude, what’s wrong with knowledge? Based on your handle, I’m guessing you’re an engineer. I thought you dudes are all about knowledge, and “working the problem”. C’mon, now.
It’s a good word, though. Especially for Che t-shirt wearing leftists.
November 24, 2008 at 2:47 PM in reply to: OT: The nail is on the coffin…UAW leader says no more concessions #308800Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantCE: Dude, what’s wrong with knowledge? Based on your handle, I’m guessing you’re an engineer. I thought you dudes are all about knowledge, and “working the problem”. C’mon, now.
It’s a good word, though. Especially for Che t-shirt wearing leftists.
November 24, 2008 at 2:47 PM in reply to: OT: The nail is on the coffin…UAW leader says no more concessions #308821Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantCE: Dude, what’s wrong with knowledge? Based on your handle, I’m guessing you’re an engineer. I thought you dudes are all about knowledge, and “working the problem”. C’mon, now.
It’s a good word, though. Especially for Che t-shirt wearing leftists.
November 24, 2008 at 2:47 PM in reply to: OT: The nail is on the coffin…UAW leader says no more concessions #308884Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantCE: Dude, what’s wrong with knowledge? Based on your handle, I’m guessing you’re an engineer. I thought you dudes are all about knowledge, and “working the problem”. C’mon, now.
It’s a good word, though. Especially for Che t-shirt wearing leftists.
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantarraya: Excellent article. Very informative. I did not know about Biden’s past voting record and it was interesting to note how has past voting directly conflicts with much of what Obama holds dear.
This message of “change” is really “business as usual”, it’s just been wrapped in a new, more rhetorically gifted package. All of these Clinton appointments would certainly suggest that the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Of course, Breeze won’t read the article. It contains all those pesky facts. They do so get in the way of good polemics and propaganda.
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantarraya: Excellent article. Very informative. I did not know about Biden’s past voting record and it was interesting to note how has past voting directly conflicts with much of what Obama holds dear.
This message of “change” is really “business as usual”, it’s just been wrapped in a new, more rhetorically gifted package. All of these Clinton appointments would certainly suggest that the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Of course, Breeze won’t read the article. It contains all those pesky facts. They do so get in the way of good polemics and propaganda.
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantarraya: Excellent article. Very informative. I did not know about Biden’s past voting record and it was interesting to note how has past voting directly conflicts with much of what Obama holds dear.
This message of “change” is really “business as usual”, it’s just been wrapped in a new, more rhetorically gifted package. All of these Clinton appointments would certainly suggest that the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Of course, Breeze won’t read the article. It contains all those pesky facts. They do so get in the way of good polemics and propaganda.
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantarraya: Excellent article. Very informative. I did not know about Biden’s past voting record and it was interesting to note how has past voting directly conflicts with much of what Obama holds dear.
This message of “change” is really “business as usual”, it’s just been wrapped in a new, more rhetorically gifted package. All of these Clinton appointments would certainly suggest that the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Of course, Breeze won’t read the article. It contains all those pesky facts. They do so get in the way of good polemics and propaganda.
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantarraya: Excellent article. Very informative. I did not know about Biden’s past voting record and it was interesting to note how has past voting directly conflicts with much of what Obama holds dear.
This message of “change” is really “business as usual”, it’s just been wrapped in a new, more rhetorically gifted package. All of these Clinton appointments would certainly suggest that the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Of course, Breeze won’t read the article. It contains all those pesky facts. They do so get in the way of good polemics and propaganda.
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantSocratt/Meadandale: Don’t go down the rabbit hole with this guy!
He is a completely propagandized little Lefty. To prove the point, ask him any serious question and see if he answers. He won’t.
For instance, and given his love of all things Clinton, ask him about Slick Willie’s forays into foreign policy and how those turned out, specifically in places like Somalia, the Balkans, Haiti and especially Iraq.
Ah, Iraq. Clinton and his administration were BIG believers in WMD. They also gave us wonderful pieces of legislation, like the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, right? What did that say again? Oh, yeah, it advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein, by any means, including invasion.
How about Clinton’s stance on torture, especially extraordinary rendition? What’s that? He started the policy of extraordinary rendition? No kidding!
And his signature on the NSA Echelon and Carnivore programs in 1994? You know the ones widely expanding governmental search capabilities into our private lives, including the widening of the 1978 FISA program?
He is either a troll or someone so blinded by the propaganda he doesn’t know any better and is therefore not up to the debate anyway. My advice is to let it go.
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantSocratt/Meadandale: Don’t go down the rabbit hole with this guy!
He is a completely propagandized little Lefty. To prove the point, ask him any serious question and see if he answers. He won’t.
For instance, and given his love of all things Clinton, ask him about Slick Willie’s forays into foreign policy and how those turned out, specifically in places like Somalia, the Balkans, Haiti and especially Iraq.
Ah, Iraq. Clinton and his administration were BIG believers in WMD. They also gave us wonderful pieces of legislation, like the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, right? What did that say again? Oh, yeah, it advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein, by any means, including invasion.
How about Clinton’s stance on torture, especially extraordinary rendition? What’s that? He started the policy of extraordinary rendition? No kidding!
And his signature on the NSA Echelon and Carnivore programs in 1994? You know the ones widely expanding governmental search capabilities into our private lives, including the widening of the 1978 FISA program?
He is either a troll or someone so blinded by the propaganda he doesn’t know any better and is therefore not up to the debate anyway. My advice is to let it go.
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantSocratt/Meadandale: Don’t go down the rabbit hole with this guy!
He is a completely propagandized little Lefty. To prove the point, ask him any serious question and see if he answers. He won’t.
For instance, and given his love of all things Clinton, ask him about Slick Willie’s forays into foreign policy and how those turned out, specifically in places like Somalia, the Balkans, Haiti and especially Iraq.
Ah, Iraq. Clinton and his administration were BIG believers in WMD. They also gave us wonderful pieces of legislation, like the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, right? What did that say again? Oh, yeah, it advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein, by any means, including invasion.
How about Clinton’s stance on torture, especially extraordinary rendition? What’s that? He started the policy of extraordinary rendition? No kidding!
And his signature on the NSA Echelon and Carnivore programs in 1994? You know the ones widely expanding governmental search capabilities into our private lives, including the widening of the 1978 FISA program?
He is either a troll or someone so blinded by the propaganda he doesn’t know any better and is therefore not up to the debate anyway. My advice is to let it go.
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantSocratt/Meadandale: Don’t go down the rabbit hole with this guy!
He is a completely propagandized little Lefty. To prove the point, ask him any serious question and see if he answers. He won’t.
For instance, and given his love of all things Clinton, ask him about Slick Willie’s forays into foreign policy and how those turned out, specifically in places like Somalia, the Balkans, Haiti and especially Iraq.
Ah, Iraq. Clinton and his administration were BIG believers in WMD. They also gave us wonderful pieces of legislation, like the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, right? What did that say again? Oh, yeah, it advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein, by any means, including invasion.
How about Clinton’s stance on torture, especially extraordinary rendition? What’s that? He started the policy of extraordinary rendition? No kidding!
And his signature on the NSA Echelon and Carnivore programs in 1994? You know the ones widely expanding governmental search capabilities into our private lives, including the widening of the 1978 FISA program?
He is either a troll or someone so blinded by the propaganda he doesn’t know any better and is therefore not up to the debate anyway. My advice is to let it go.
-
AuthorPosts
