Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
AK
ParticipantYeah it doesn’t look very good for Mr. Sikes.
But it’s also interesting that Toyota suddenly displays this amazing ability to retrieve information from the engine computer when needed to cover its corporate behind … whereas similar data hasn’t been available in other alleged cases of sudden acceleration.
AK
ParticipantYeah it doesn’t look very good for Mr. Sikes.
But it’s also interesting that Toyota suddenly displays this amazing ability to retrieve information from the engine computer when needed to cover its corporate behind … whereas similar data hasn’t been available in other alleged cases of sudden acceleration.
AK
ParticipantYeah it doesn’t look very good for Mr. Sikes.
But it’s also interesting that Toyota suddenly displays this amazing ability to retrieve information from the engine computer when needed to cover its corporate behind … whereas similar data hasn’t been available in other alleged cases of sudden acceleration.
AK
ParticipantYeah it doesn’t look very good for Mr. Sikes.
But it’s also interesting that Toyota suddenly displays this amazing ability to retrieve information from the engine computer when needed to cover its corporate behind … whereas similar data hasn’t been available in other alleged cases of sudden acceleration.
AK
ParticipantYeah it doesn’t look very good for Mr. Sikes.
But it’s also interesting that Toyota suddenly displays this amazing ability to retrieve information from the engine computer when needed to cover its corporate behind … whereas similar data hasn’t been available in other alleged cases of sudden acceleration.
AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
March 14, 2010 at 1:58 PM in reply to: What is the appropriate amount to spend for a kid’s birthday present (not your kid)? #525717AK
ParticipantMarch 14, 2010 at 1:58 PM in reply to: What is the appropriate amount to spend for a kid’s birthday present (not your kid)? #525849AK
ParticipantMarch 14, 2010 at 1:58 PM in reply to: What is the appropriate amount to spend for a kid’s birthday present (not your kid)? #526295AK
ParticipantMarch 14, 2010 at 1:58 PM in reply to: What is the appropriate amount to spend for a kid’s birthday present (not your kid)? #526392AK
Participant -
AuthorPosts
