Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
AK
ParticipantDoesn’t FHA have a 31% limit for PITI expenses on top of the 43% DTI limit? If so I’d imagine that would be a deal-breaker for most Californians.
Jillayne Schlicke at raincityguide.com makes a few pointed observations about FHA “reform”:
FHA Secure: A Political Power Move Disguised as a Helping Hand to Those in Need
Among other things, she notes that FHA loan performance is already less than stellar. And I love this rant:
When I pay my federal income tax next spring, perhaps there will be a box I can check to elect whether or not Iโd like to give my taxes over to the corporate welfare plan cleverly disguised as more FHA loan programs and subsidizing pre-foreclosure loan modifications. Government was never intended to bail out corporations. Let the invisible hand of the free market take its toll. Let the corporations that screwed up go down, let those employees re-enter the workforce elsewhere, let the homebuyers who fell for pay option, interest only, negative am ARMs re-enter the home market as renters.
Ooooh ๐
AK
ParticipantDoesn’t FHA have a 31% limit for PITI expenses on top of the 43% DTI limit? If so I’d imagine that would be a deal-breaker for most Californians.
Jillayne Schlicke at raincityguide.com makes a few pointed observations about FHA “reform”:
FHA Secure: A Political Power Move Disguised as a Helping Hand to Those in Need
Among other things, she notes that FHA loan performance is already less than stellar. And I love this rant:
When I pay my federal income tax next spring, perhaps there will be a box I can check to elect whether or not Iโd like to give my taxes over to the corporate welfare plan cleverly disguised as more FHA loan programs and subsidizing pre-foreclosure loan modifications. Government was never intended to bail out corporations. Let the invisible hand of the free market take its toll. Let the corporations that screwed up go down, let those employees re-enter the workforce elsewhere, let the homebuyers who fell for pay option, interest only, negative am ARMs re-enter the home market as renters.
Ooooh ๐
AK
ParticipantDoesn’t FHA have a 31% limit for PITI expenses on top of the 43% DTI limit? If so I’d imagine that would be a deal-breaker for most Californians.
Jillayne Schlicke at raincityguide.com makes a few pointed observations about FHA “reform”:
FHA Secure: A Political Power Move Disguised as a Helping Hand to Those in Need
Among other things, she notes that FHA loan performance is already less than stellar. And I love this rant:
When I pay my federal income tax next spring, perhaps there will be a box I can check to elect whether or not Iโd like to give my taxes over to the corporate welfare plan cleverly disguised as more FHA loan programs and subsidizing pre-foreclosure loan modifications. Government was never intended to bail out corporations. Let the invisible hand of the free market take its toll. Let the corporations that screwed up go down, let those employees re-enter the workforce elsewhere, let the homebuyers who fell for pay option, interest only, negative am ARMs re-enter the home market as renters.
Ooooh ๐
AK
ParticipantDoesn’t FHA have a 31% limit for PITI expenses on top of the 43% DTI limit? If so I’d imagine that would be a deal-breaker for most Californians.
Jillayne Schlicke at raincityguide.com makes a few pointed observations about FHA “reform”:
FHA Secure: A Political Power Move Disguised as a Helping Hand to Those in Need
Among other things, she notes that FHA loan performance is already less than stellar. And I love this rant:
When I pay my federal income tax next spring, perhaps there will be a box I can check to elect whether or not Iโd like to give my taxes over to the corporate welfare plan cleverly disguised as more FHA loan programs and subsidizing pre-foreclosure loan modifications. Government was never intended to bail out corporations. Let the invisible hand of the free market take its toll. Let the corporations that screwed up go down, let those employees re-enter the workforce elsewhere, let the homebuyers who fell for pay option, interest only, negative am ARMs re-enter the home market as renters.
Ooooh ๐
AK
ParticipantDoesn’t FHA have a 31% limit for PITI expenses on top of the 43% DTI limit? If so I’d imagine that would be a deal-breaker for most Californians.
Jillayne Schlicke at raincityguide.com makes a few pointed observations about FHA “reform”:
FHA Secure: A Political Power Move Disguised as a Helping Hand to Those in Need
Among other things, she notes that FHA loan performance is already less than stellar. And I love this rant:
When I pay my federal income tax next spring, perhaps there will be a box I can check to elect whether or not Iโd like to give my taxes over to the corporate welfare plan cleverly disguised as more FHA loan programs and subsidizing pre-foreclosure loan modifications. Government was never intended to bail out corporations. Let the invisible hand of the free market take its toll. Let the corporations that screwed up go down, let those employees re-enter the workforce elsewhere, let the homebuyers who fell for pay option, interest only, negative am ARMs re-enter the home market as renters.
Ooooh ๐
AK
ParticipantRaising the Fannie and Freddie conforming limit is bad enough.
But FHA?!?!?!?!?!?!?
AK
ParticipantRaising the Fannie and Freddie conforming limit is bad enough.
But FHA?!?!?!?!?!?!?
AK
ParticipantRaising the Fannie and Freddie conforming limit is bad enough.
But FHA?!?!?!?!?!?!?
AK
ParticipantRaising the Fannie and Freddie conforming limit is bad enough.
But FHA?!?!?!?!?!?!?
AK
ParticipantRaising the Fannie and Freddie conforming limit is bad enough.
But FHA?!?!?!?!?!?!?
AK
ParticipantAt the very least run a Carfax or similar report on *any* used vehicle, even “certified pre-owned.” Many are former out-of-state rentals, and many state DMVs don’t document flood-damaged cars.
AK
ParticipantAt the very least run a Carfax or similar report on *any* used vehicle, even “certified pre-owned.” Many are former out-of-state rentals, and many state DMVs don’t document flood-damaged cars.
AK
ParticipantAt the very least run a Carfax or similar report on *any* used vehicle, even “certified pre-owned.” Many are former out-of-state rentals, and many state DMVs don’t document flood-damaged cars.
AK
ParticipantAt the very least run a Carfax or similar report on *any* used vehicle, even “certified pre-owned.” Many are former out-of-state rentals, and many state DMVs don’t document flood-damaged cars.
-
AuthorPosts
