Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
afx114
ParticipantAs much as Webb seems like a good idea (Secretary of the Navy under Reagan), it won’t be Webb, because the Dems just won his seat in a hard fought battle. They’ll likely lose that seat if he vacates and they need seats in the Senate just as bad as they need the Presidency.
…. BUT, I could see Webb on the Dem ticket in 2012 if things don’t work out this year. And he’ll definitely be on the short list for 2016.
ParticipantAs much as Webb seems like a good idea (Secretary of the Navy under Reagan), it won’t be Webb, because the Dems just won his seat in a hard fought battle. They’ll likely lose that seat if he vacates and they need seats in the Senate just as bad as they need the Presidency.
…. BUT, I could see Webb on the Dem ticket in 2012 if things don’t work out this year. And he’ll definitely be on the short list for 2016.
ParticipantAs much as Webb seems like a good idea (Secretary of the Navy under Reagan), it won’t be Webb, because the Dems just won his seat in a hard fought battle. They’ll likely lose that seat if he vacates and they need seats in the Senate just as bad as they need the Presidency.
…. BUT, I could see Webb on the Dem ticket in 2012 if things don’t work out this year. And he’ll definitely be on the short list for 2016.
ParticipantI’m guessing Obama will go with Wes Clark, because:
– Military strength to combat McCain’s only plus.
– He’s a Hillary supporter – unify the party.
– He ran in ’04, people already kinda know about him.
– He’s a handsome white dude (calm the nerves of the people afraid to vote for an ‘angry black muslim america-hater’).ParticipantI’m guessing Obama will go with Wes Clark, because:
– Military strength to combat McCain’s only plus.
– He’s a Hillary supporter – unify the party.
– He ran in ’04, people already kinda know about him.
– He’s a handsome white dude (calm the nerves of the people afraid to vote for an ‘angry black muslim america-hater’).ParticipantI’m guessing Obama will go with Wes Clark, because:
– Military strength to combat McCain’s only plus.
– He’s a Hillary supporter – unify the party.
– He ran in ’04, people already kinda know about him.
– He’s a handsome white dude (calm the nerves of the people afraid to vote for an ‘angry black muslim america-hater’).ParticipantI’m guessing Obama will go with Wes Clark, because:
– Military strength to combat McCain’s only plus.
– He’s a Hillary supporter – unify the party.
– He ran in ’04, people already kinda know about him.
– He’s a handsome white dude (calm the nerves of the people afraid to vote for an ‘angry black muslim america-hater’).ParticipantI’m guessing Obama will go with Wes Clark, because:
– Military strength to combat McCain’s only plus.
– He’s a Hillary supporter – unify the party.
– He ran in ’04, people already kinda know about him.
– He’s a handsome white dude (calm the nerves of the people afraid to vote for an ‘angry black muslim america-hater’).ParticipantPeople are also forgetting that in the primaries, Dem turnout and registration has been somewhere around 4-1 compared to that of Republicans. Granted, the Dem primaries have gone on longer and generated more ‘buzz,’ but you can’t argue with the fact that for every voter that has registered Republican this cycle, there have been 3-4 that have registered (or switched to) Democrat.
A lot of the time people get caught up in all the bullshit about flag pins and pastors and forget to look at the NUMBERS.
ParticipantPeople are also forgetting that in the primaries, Dem turnout and registration has been somewhere around 4-1 compared to that of Republicans. Granted, the Dem primaries have gone on longer and generated more ‘buzz,’ but you can’t argue with the fact that for every voter that has registered Republican this cycle, there have been 3-4 that have registered (or switched to) Democrat.
A lot of the time people get caught up in all the bullshit about flag pins and pastors and forget to look at the NUMBERS.
ParticipantPeople are also forgetting that in the primaries, Dem turnout and registration has been somewhere around 4-1 compared to that of Republicans. Granted, the Dem primaries have gone on longer and generated more ‘buzz,’ but you can’t argue with the fact that for every voter that has registered Republican this cycle, there have been 3-4 that have registered (or switched to) Democrat.
A lot of the time people get caught up in all the bullshit about flag pins and pastors and forget to look at the NUMBERS.
ParticipantPeople are also forgetting that in the primaries, Dem turnout and registration has been somewhere around 4-1 compared to that of Republicans. Granted, the Dem primaries have gone on longer and generated more ‘buzz,’ but you can’t argue with the fact that for every voter that has registered Republican this cycle, there have been 3-4 that have registered (or switched to) Democrat.
A lot of the time people get caught up in all the bullshit about flag pins and pastors and forget to look at the NUMBERS.
ParticipantPeople are also forgetting that in the primaries, Dem turnout and registration has been somewhere around 4-1 compared to that of Republicans. Granted, the Dem primaries have gone on longer and generated more ‘buzz,’ but you can’t argue with the fact that for every voter that has registered Republican this cycle, there have been 3-4 that have registered (or switched to) Democrat.
A lot of the time people get caught up in all the bullshit about flag pins and pastors and forget to look at the NUMBERS.
ParticipantIf she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away
Lets flip this around.. if he’s as unpopular as you say he is, then why the hell can’t Clinton put him away?
-
AuthorPosts
