[afx114]

How can you not associate militant gun-weilding anti-government activists with the party of the military, guns, and small government? They may not be card-carrying members, but the Venn diagram is pretty damning.

[afx114]

How can you not associate militant gun-weilding anti-government activists with the party of the military, guns, and small government? They may not be card-carrying members, but the Venn diagram is pretty damning.

[afx114]

How can you not associate militant gun-weilding anti-government activists with the party of the military, guns, and small government? They may not be card-carrying members, but the Venn diagram is pretty damning.

[afx114]

Where did I say owning a gun is a bad thing? I said that mentally disturbed people with a history of erratic behavior owning a gun is a bad thing. Big difference. Are you taking the position that it is a good thing that Jared Lee Loughner was able to purchase a firearm with no questions asked?

[afx114]

Where did I say owning a gun is a bad thing? I said that mentally disturbed people with a history of erratic behavior owning a gun is a bad thing. Big difference. Are you taking the position that it is a good thing that Jared Lee Loughner was able to purchase a firearm with no questions asked?

[afx114]

Where did I say owning a gun is a bad thing? I said that mentally disturbed people with a history of erratic behavior owning a gun is a bad thing. Big difference. Are you taking the position that it is a good thing that Jared Lee Loughner was able to purchase a firearm with no questions asked?

[afx114]

Where did I say owning a gun is a bad thing? I said that mentally disturbed people with a history of erratic behavior owning a gun is a bad thing. Big difference. Are you taking the position that it is a good thing that Jared Lee Loughner was able to purchase a firearm with no questions asked?

[afx114]

Where did I say owning a gun is a bad thing? I said that mentally disturbed people with a history of erratic behavior owning a gun is a bad thing. Big difference. Are you taking the position that it is a good thing that Jared Lee Loughner was able to purchase a firearm with no questions asked?

[afx114]

What is being lost in this discussion is not who is saying the the violent rhetoric, but who is listening to it.

Polls schmolls, but this CBS poll is interesting:

Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to take violent action against the government, or is it never justified?

Republican 28% yes, 64% no
Democrat 11% yes, 81% no
Indepdent 11% yes, 81% no

I know, I know, Dan Rather probably cooked up those numbers. But would anyone really disagree with them? Everyone knows which is the party of the 2nd Amendment and its “remedies.” They’ve been proud of that fact for decades. So much so that they’ve fought common-sense legislation meant to keep mentally unstable Army rejects from getting firearms without a license. This is the false equivalency to which I referred up-thread. Post as many inflammatory quotes from Democrats as you want, it doesn’t change the fact that the right is the side with all the guns.

[afx114]

What is being lost in this discussion is not who is saying the the violent rhetoric, but who is listening to it.

Polls schmolls, but this CBS poll is interesting:

Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to take violent action against the government, or is it never justified?

Republican 28% yes, 64% no
Democrat 11% yes, 81% no
Indepdent 11% yes, 81% no

I know, I know, Dan Rather probably cooked up those numbers. But would anyone really disagree with them? Everyone knows which is the party of the 2nd Amendment and its “remedies.” They’ve been proud of that fact for decades. So much so that they’ve fought common-sense legislation meant to keep mentally unstable Army rejects from getting firearms without a license. This is the false equivalency to which I referred up-thread. Post as many inflammatory quotes from Democrats as you want, it doesn’t change the fact that the right is the side with all the guns.

[afx114]

What is being lost in this discussion is not who is saying the the violent rhetoric, but who is listening to it.

Polls schmolls, but this CBS poll is interesting:

Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to take violent action against the government, or is it never justified?

Republican 28% yes, 64% no
Democrat 11% yes, 81% no
Indepdent 11% yes, 81% no

I know, I know, Dan Rather probably cooked up those numbers. But would anyone really disagree with them? Everyone knows which is the party of the 2nd Amendment and its “remedies.” They’ve been proud of that fact for decades. So much so that they’ve fought common-sense legislation meant to keep mentally unstable Army rejects from getting firearms without a license. This is the false equivalency to which I referred up-thread. Post as many inflammatory quotes from Democrats as you want, it doesn’t change the fact that the right is the side with all the guns.

[afx114]

What is being lost in this discussion is not who is saying the the violent rhetoric, but who is listening to it.

Polls schmolls, but this CBS poll is interesting:

Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to take violent action against the government, or is it never justified?

Republican 28% yes, 64% no
Democrat 11% yes, 81% no
Indepdent 11% yes, 81% no

I know, I know, Dan Rather probably cooked up those numbers. But would anyone really disagree with them? Everyone knows which is the party of the 2nd Amendment and its “remedies.” They’ve been proud of that fact for decades. So much so that they’ve fought common-sense legislation meant to keep mentally unstable Army rejects from getting firearms without a license. This is the false equivalency to which I referred up-thread. Post as many inflammatory quotes from Democrats as you want, it doesn’t change the fact that the right is the side with all the guns.

[afx114]

What is being lost in this discussion is not who is saying the the violent rhetoric, but who is listening to it.

Polls schmolls, but this CBS poll is interesting:

Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to take violent action against the government, or is it never justified?

Republican 28% yes, 64% no
Democrat 11% yes, 81% no
Indepdent 11% yes, 81% no

I know, I know, Dan Rather probably cooked up those numbers. But would anyone really disagree with them? Everyone knows which is the party of the 2nd Amendment and its “remedies.” They’ve been proud of that fact for decades. So much so that they’ve fought common-sense legislation meant to keep mentally unstable Army rejects from getting firearms without a license. This is the false equivalency to which I referred up-thread. Post as many inflammatory quotes from Democrats as you want, it doesn’t change the fact that the right is the side with all the guns.

[afx114]

And if you thought that this incident was going to chill things out, think again:

San Diego white nationalist renews revolutionary rhetoric after Tucson shooting

[afx114]

And if you thought that this incident was going to chill things out, think again:

San Diego white nationalist renews revolutionary rhetoric after Tucson shooting

[Author]

Posts