[afx114]

Government doesn’t want to take over because they know that as soon as they do, they can no longer blame BP. It’s looking like there’s no stopping this thing until the relief wells are completed. If there’s nothing they can do, what’s the point of taking over the impossible task and the blame that will come with it?

[afx114]

Government doesn’t want to take over because they know that as soon as they do, they can no longer blame BP. It’s looking like there’s no stopping this thing until the relief wells are completed. If there’s nothing they can do, what’s the point of taking over the impossible task and the blame that will come with it?

[afx114]

Government doesn’t want to take over because they know that as soon as they do, they can no longer blame BP. It’s looking like there’s no stopping this thing until the relief wells are completed. If there’s nothing they can do, what’s the point of taking over the impossible task and the blame that will come with it?

[afx114]

The Russian nukes were successful in hundreds of feet of depth, not the mile we’re dealing with here. The pressures at this depth change the game completely.

Everyone thought that peak oil would arrive as high prices, but perhaps it has revealed itself instead by the risks that we are now taking to retrieve oil that is becoming increasingly difficult to reach.

[afx114]

The Russian nukes were successful in hundreds of feet of depth, not the mile we’re dealing with here. The pressures at this depth change the game completely.

Everyone thought that peak oil would arrive as high prices, but perhaps it has revealed itself instead by the risks that we are now taking to retrieve oil that is becoming increasingly difficult to reach.

[afx114]

The Russian nukes were successful in hundreds of feet of depth, not the mile we’re dealing with here. The pressures at this depth change the game completely.

Everyone thought that peak oil would arrive as high prices, but perhaps it has revealed itself instead by the risks that we are now taking to retrieve oil that is becoming increasingly difficult to reach.

[afx114]

The Russian nukes were successful in hundreds of feet of depth, not the mile we’re dealing with here. The pressures at this depth change the game completely.

Everyone thought that peak oil would arrive as high prices, but perhaps it has revealed itself instead by the risks that we are now taking to retrieve oil that is becoming increasingly difficult to reach.

[afx114]

The Russian nukes were successful in hundreds of feet of depth, not the mile we’re dealing with here. The pressures at this depth change the game completely.

Everyone thought that peak oil would arrive as high prices, but perhaps it has revealed itself instead by the risks that we are now taking to retrieve oil that is becoming increasingly difficult to reach.

[afx114]

[quote=Eugene]for Google to shoot themselves in the foot by adopting an unpopular stance and losing a chunk of their revenues, that does not make any sense.[/quote]

You mean like what they did in China? That move may not have been unpopular, but it definitely cost them a big chunk of potential revenues.

[afx114]

[quote=Eugene]for Google to shoot themselves in the foot by adopting an unpopular stance and losing a chunk of their revenues, that does not make any sense.[/quote]

You mean like what they did in China? That move may not have been unpopular, but it definitely cost them a big chunk of potential revenues.

[afx114]

[quote=Eugene]for Google to shoot themselves in the foot by adopting an unpopular stance and losing a chunk of their revenues, that does not make any sense.[/quote]

You mean like what they did in China? That move may not have been unpopular, but it definitely cost them a big chunk of potential revenues.

[afx114]

[quote=Eugene]for Google to shoot themselves in the foot by adopting an unpopular stance and losing a chunk of their revenues, that does not make any sense.[/quote]

You mean like what they did in China? That move may not have been unpopular, but it definitely cost them a big chunk of potential revenues.

[afx114]

[quote=Eugene]for Google to shoot themselves in the foot by adopting an unpopular stance and losing a chunk of their revenues, that does not make any sense.[/quote]

You mean like what they did in China? That move may not have been unpopular, but it definitely cost them a big chunk of potential revenues.

[afx114]

[quote=sdduuuude]Shouldn’t they be cutting budgets or something.[/quote]

Doesn’t ending trips to Arizona save money?

[afx114]

[quote=sdduuuude]Shouldn’t they be cutting budgets or something.[/quote]

Doesn’t ending trips to Arizona save money?

[Author]

Posts