- This topic has 70 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by denverite.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 14, 2008 at 11:47 AM #135793January 14, 2008 at 11:52 AM #135550jennyoParticipant
Zillow is in denial over the house we sold last September in Antioch. Prior to the sale, Zillow had the POS hovering in the $380K range. We originally listed it at $279K and ended up accepting an offer for $215K. The house recorded and now Zillow shows it as “recently sold” with the $215K sale price, but still values it at $310K. Its absolutely ridiculous. The house was only worth what someone was willing to pay for it…
January 14, 2008 at 11:52 AM #135849jennyoParticipantZillow is in denial over the house we sold last September in Antioch. Prior to the sale, Zillow had the POS hovering in the $380K range. We originally listed it at $279K and ended up accepting an offer for $215K. The house recorded and now Zillow shows it as “recently sold” with the $215K sale price, but still values it at $310K. Its absolutely ridiculous. The house was only worth what someone was willing to pay for it…
January 14, 2008 at 11:52 AM #135808jennyoParticipantZillow is in denial over the house we sold last September in Antioch. Prior to the sale, Zillow had the POS hovering in the $380K range. We originally listed it at $279K and ended up accepting an offer for $215K. The house recorded and now Zillow shows it as “recently sold” with the $215K sale price, but still values it at $310K. Its absolutely ridiculous. The house was only worth what someone was willing to pay for it…
January 14, 2008 at 11:52 AM #135751jennyoParticipantZillow is in denial over the house we sold last September in Antioch. Prior to the sale, Zillow had the POS hovering in the $380K range. We originally listed it at $279K and ended up accepting an offer for $215K. The house recorded and now Zillow shows it as “recently sold” with the $215K sale price, but still values it at $310K. Its absolutely ridiculous. The house was only worth what someone was willing to pay for it…
January 14, 2008 at 11:52 AM #135747jennyoParticipantZillow is in denial over the house we sold last September in Antioch. Prior to the sale, Zillow had the POS hovering in the $380K range. We originally listed it at $279K and ended up accepting an offer for $215K. The house recorded and now Zillow shows it as “recently sold” with the $215K sale price, but still values it at $310K. Its absolutely ridiculous. The house was only worth what someone was willing to pay for it…
January 15, 2008 at 8:37 AM #136122RaybyrnesParticipantI am hard pressed to see the critcism vented about zillow. For a company that is jsut a couple of years old I think that it is a phenomenal tool when used for research purposes. Additoinally as the sight coninues to gather transactional data it will get better at forecasting actual data.
Complaining about zillow is like complaining about computers during their infancy. Anyone think that zillow won’t provide reliable estimates that will threaten the appraisal industry 10 years from now.
Additonally it is FREE. Some people have to have something to complain about.
January 15, 2008 at 8:37 AM #136325RaybyrnesParticipantI am hard pressed to see the critcism vented about zillow. For a company that is jsut a couple of years old I think that it is a phenomenal tool when used for research purposes. Additoinally as the sight coninues to gather transactional data it will get better at forecasting actual data.
Complaining about zillow is like complaining about computers during their infancy. Anyone think that zillow won’t provide reliable estimates that will threaten the appraisal industry 10 years from now.
Additonally it is FREE. Some people have to have something to complain about.
January 15, 2008 at 8:37 AM #136359RaybyrnesParticipantI am hard pressed to see the critcism vented about zillow. For a company that is jsut a couple of years old I think that it is a phenomenal tool when used for research purposes. Additoinally as the sight coninues to gather transactional data it will get better at forecasting actual data.
Complaining about zillow is like complaining about computers during their infancy. Anyone think that zillow won’t provide reliable estimates that will threaten the appraisal industry 10 years from now.
Additonally it is FREE. Some people have to have something to complain about.
January 15, 2008 at 8:37 AM #136384RaybyrnesParticipantI am hard pressed to see the critcism vented about zillow. For a company that is jsut a couple of years old I think that it is a phenomenal tool when used for research purposes. Additoinally as the sight coninues to gather transactional data it will get better at forecasting actual data.
Complaining about zillow is like complaining about computers during their infancy. Anyone think that zillow won’t provide reliable estimates that will threaten the appraisal industry 10 years from now.
Additonally it is FREE. Some people have to have something to complain about.
January 15, 2008 at 8:37 AM #136426RaybyrnesParticipantI am hard pressed to see the critcism vented about zillow. For a company that is jsut a couple of years old I think that it is a phenomenal tool when used for research purposes. Additoinally as the sight coninues to gather transactional data it will get better at forecasting actual data.
Complaining about zillow is like complaining about computers during their infancy. Anyone think that zillow won’t provide reliable estimates that will threaten the appraisal industry 10 years from now.
Additonally it is FREE. Some people have to have something to complain about.
January 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM #136561RenParticipantI think peoples’ issue with it is that it’s not just inaccurate, it’s wildly inaccurate – not just due to limited data, but to incorrect calculations. Maybe someone else knows more about that, I’d like to learn how it values properties.
A friend of mine has a house in Vista with a zestimate of $1.3m (and climbing, according to zillow), and he’d be lucky to get $1m for it today.
I don’t think it will ever threaten appraisers – it doesn’t store enough data about individual homes, and has no way of finding that information out without human intervention.
January 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM #136517RenParticipantI think peoples’ issue with it is that it’s not just inaccurate, it’s wildly inaccurate – not just due to limited data, but to incorrect calculations. Maybe someone else knows more about that, I’d like to learn how it values properties.
A friend of mine has a house in Vista with a zestimate of $1.3m (and climbing, according to zillow), and he’d be lucky to get $1m for it today.
I don’t think it will ever threaten appraisers – it doesn’t store enough data about individual homes, and has no way of finding that information out without human intervention.
January 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM #136495RenParticipantI think peoples’ issue with it is that it’s not just inaccurate, it’s wildly inaccurate – not just due to limited data, but to incorrect calculations. Maybe someone else knows more about that, I’d like to learn how it values properties.
A friend of mine has a house in Vista with a zestimate of $1.3m (and climbing, according to zillow), and he’d be lucky to get $1m for it today.
I don’t think it will ever threaten appraisers – it doesn’t store enough data about individual homes, and has no way of finding that information out without human intervention.
January 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM #136459RenParticipantI think peoples’ issue with it is that it’s not just inaccurate, it’s wildly inaccurate – not just due to limited data, but to incorrect calculations. Maybe someone else knows more about that, I’d like to learn how it values properties.
A friend of mine has a house in Vista with a zestimate of $1.3m (and climbing, according to zillow), and he’d be lucky to get $1m for it today.
I don’t think it will ever threaten appraisers – it doesn’t store enough data about individual homes, and has no way of finding that information out without human intervention.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.