- This topic has 150 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 20, 2007 at 10:05 AM #101826November 20, 2007 at 10:24 AM #101702PortlockParticipant
[img_assist|nid=5533|title=couldn’t resist|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=350]
November 20, 2007 at 10:24 AM #101788PortlockParticipant[img_assist|nid=5533|title=couldn’t resist|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=350]
November 20, 2007 at 10:24 AM #101800PortlockParticipant[img_assist|nid=5533|title=couldn’t resist|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=350]
November 20, 2007 at 10:24 AM #101818PortlockParticipant[img_assist|nid=5533|title=couldn’t resist|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=350]
November 20, 2007 at 10:24 AM #101846PortlockParticipant[img_assist|nid=5533|title=couldn’t resist|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=350]
November 20, 2007 at 10:45 AM #101727pertinazzioParticipantQUOTE I don’t even understand your argument. We have always stood by our belief that the prices do not support fundamentals. It’s the media that has finally realized this reality as well. The media is now in agreement with what we have believed since the beginning. Therefore we agree with the media while formerly we disagreed π Capisce? END QUOTE
I agree with what he said! What is the logical inconsistency in disagreeing with folks when they are wrong and agreeing with them when they are right?
Beatus ille qui procul negotiis … paterna rura bobus exercet suis, solutus omni fenore….. Horace
November 20, 2007 at 10:45 AM #101813pertinazzioParticipantQUOTE I don’t even understand your argument. We have always stood by our belief that the prices do not support fundamentals. It’s the media that has finally realized this reality as well. The media is now in agreement with what we have believed since the beginning. Therefore we agree with the media while formerly we disagreed π Capisce? END QUOTE
I agree with what he said! What is the logical inconsistency in disagreeing with folks when they are wrong and agreeing with them when they are right?
Beatus ille qui procul negotiis … paterna rura bobus exercet suis, solutus omni fenore….. Horace
November 20, 2007 at 10:45 AM #101825pertinazzioParticipantQUOTE I don’t even understand your argument. We have always stood by our belief that the prices do not support fundamentals. It’s the media that has finally realized this reality as well. The media is now in agreement with what we have believed since the beginning. Therefore we agree with the media while formerly we disagreed π Capisce? END QUOTE
I agree with what he said! What is the logical inconsistency in disagreeing with folks when they are wrong and agreeing with them when they are right?
Beatus ille qui procul negotiis … paterna rura bobus exercet suis, solutus omni fenore….. Horace
November 20, 2007 at 10:45 AM #101844pertinazzioParticipantQUOTE I don’t even understand your argument. We have always stood by our belief that the prices do not support fundamentals. It’s the media that has finally realized this reality as well. The media is now in agreement with what we have believed since the beginning. Therefore we agree with the media while formerly we disagreed π Capisce? END QUOTE
I agree with what he said! What is the logical inconsistency in disagreeing with folks when they are wrong and agreeing with them when they are right?
Beatus ille qui procul negotiis … paterna rura bobus exercet suis, solutus omni fenore….. Horace
November 20, 2007 at 10:45 AM #101871pertinazzioParticipantQUOTE I don’t even understand your argument. We have always stood by our belief that the prices do not support fundamentals. It’s the media that has finally realized this reality as well. The media is now in agreement with what we have believed since the beginning. Therefore we agree with the media while formerly we disagreed π Capisce? END QUOTE
I agree with what he said! What is the logical inconsistency in disagreeing with folks when they are wrong and agreeing with them when they are right?
Beatus ille qui procul negotiis … paterna rura bobus exercet suis, solutus omni fenore….. Horace
November 20, 2007 at 3:02 PM #101905NotCrankyParticipantI am going to go out on a limb Alex. Not buying is really bothering you. I understand that. Either don’t let it, or buy a stupid house and don’t let anyone make a federal case against you for it. It’s your life. Getting fussy with us doesn’t change where you are at with this decision.
November 20, 2007 at 3:02 PM #101986NotCrankyParticipantI am going to go out on a limb Alex. Not buying is really bothering you. I understand that. Either don’t let it, or buy a stupid house and don’t let anyone make a federal case against you for it. It’s your life. Getting fussy with us doesn’t change where you are at with this decision.
November 20, 2007 at 3:02 PM #101998NotCrankyParticipantI am going to go out on a limb Alex. Not buying is really bothering you. I understand that. Either don’t let it, or buy a stupid house and don’t let anyone make a federal case against you for it. It’s your life. Getting fussy with us doesn’t change where you are at with this decision.
November 20, 2007 at 3:02 PM #102020NotCrankyParticipantI am going to go out on a limb Alex. Not buying is really bothering you. I understand that. Either don’t let it, or buy a stupid house and don’t let anyone make a federal case against you for it. It’s your life. Getting fussy with us doesn’t change where you are at with this decision.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.