- This topic has 1,823 replies, 128 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 6 months ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 25, 2009 at 2:27 PM #420420June 25, 2009 at 2:27 PM #420691afx114Participant
From this angle it could be well behind the house in question, which would place it well off to the left of the original photograph.
June 25, 2009 at 2:27 PM #420757afx114ParticipantFrom this angle it could be well behind the house in question, which would place it well off to the left of the original photograph.
June 25, 2009 at 2:27 PM #420918afx114ParticipantFrom this angle it could be well behind the house in question, which would place it well off to the left of the original photograph.
June 25, 2009 at 2:39 PM #420198EugeneParticipant[quote=afx114]From this angle it could be well behind the house in question, which would place it well off to the left of the original photograph.[/quote]
No, drive around the block in Google Street View and you’ll see – it’s either on the roof of that house or right next to it.
June 25, 2009 at 2:39 PM #420430EugeneParticipant[quote=afx114]From this angle it could be well behind the house in question, which would place it well off to the left of the original photograph.[/quote]
No, drive around the block in Google Street View and you’ll see – it’s either on the roof of that house or right next to it.
June 25, 2009 at 2:39 PM #420700EugeneParticipant[quote=afx114]From this angle it could be well behind the house in question, which would place it well off to the left of the original photograph.[/quote]
No, drive around the block in Google Street View and you’ll see – it’s either on the roof of that house or right next to it.
June 25, 2009 at 2:39 PM #420767EugeneParticipant[quote=afx114]From this angle it could be well behind the house in question, which would place it well off to the left of the original photograph.[/quote]
No, drive around the block in Google Street View and you’ll see – it’s either on the roof of that house or right next to it.
June 25, 2009 at 2:39 PM #420928EugeneParticipant[quote=afx114]From this angle it could be well behind the house in question, which would place it well off to the left of the original photograph.[/quote]
No, drive around the block in Google Street View and you’ll see – it’s either on the roof of that house or right next to it.
July 6, 2009 at 3:39 PM #425983EugeneParticipantI drove by, the pole is on the roof of neighbor’s house, and it’s definitely been photoshopped out in the MLS listing.
Also, the house went pending on Saturday, amazing… who’d give 489k for 1300 sf in that neighborhood? Looked rather seedy to me.
July 6, 2009 at 3:39 PM #426210EugeneParticipantI drove by, the pole is on the roof of neighbor’s house, and it’s definitely been photoshopped out in the MLS listing.
Also, the house went pending on Saturday, amazing… who’d give 489k for 1300 sf in that neighborhood? Looked rather seedy to me.
July 6, 2009 at 3:39 PM #426499EugeneParticipantI drove by, the pole is on the roof of neighbor’s house, and it’s definitely been photoshopped out in the MLS listing.
Also, the house went pending on Saturday, amazing… who’d give 489k for 1300 sf in that neighborhood? Looked rather seedy to me.
July 6, 2009 at 3:39 PM #426568EugeneParticipantI drove by, the pole is on the roof of neighbor’s house, and it’s definitely been photoshopped out in the MLS listing.
Also, the house went pending on Saturday, amazing… who’d give 489k for 1300 sf in that neighborhood? Looked rather seedy to me.
July 6, 2009 at 3:39 PM #426731EugeneParticipantI drove by, the pole is on the roof of neighbor’s house, and it’s definitely been photoshopped out in the MLS listing.
Also, the house went pending on Saturday, amazing… who’d give 489k for 1300 sf in that neighborhood? Looked rather seedy to me.
July 6, 2009 at 3:42 PM #425988CoronitaParticipant[quote=Eugene]I drove by, the pole is on the roof of neighbor’s house, and it’s definitely been photoshopped out in the MLS listing.
Also, the house went pending on Saturday, amazing… who’d give 489k for 1300 sf in that neighborhood? Looked rather seedy to me.[/quote]
Apparently someone if it went pending 🙂
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.