- This topic has 10 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by
aldante.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 14, 2009 at 11:52 AM #16494October 14, 2009 at 1:33 PM #468924
CA renter
ParticipantThat included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm 😉
October 14, 2009 at 1:33 PM #469108ParticipantThat included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm 😉
October 14, 2009 at 1:33 PM #469465ParticipantThat included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm 😉
October 14, 2009 at 1:33 PM #469539ParticipantThat included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm 😉
October 14, 2009 at 1:33 PM #469751ParticipantThat included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm 😉
October 14, 2009 at 1:44 PM #468949aldante
Participant[quote=CA renter]That included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm ;)[/quote]
got me on that one………
October 14, 2009 at 1:44 PM #469133Participant[quote=CA renter]That included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm ;)[/quote]
got me on that one………
October 14, 2009 at 1:44 PM #469490Participant[quote=CA renter]That included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm ;)[/quote]
got me on that one………
October 14, 2009 at 1:44 PM #469563Participant[quote=CA renter]That included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm ;)[/quote]
got me on that one………
October 14, 2009 at 1:44 PM #469776Participant[quote=CA renter]That included a cash retention bonus of $7,700 for a kitchen assistant, $700 for a “file administrator,” according to the FT. Senior executives took home bonuses of up to $4 million.
The financial products unit is scheduled to be awarded another $198 million in retention bonuses next March, but the Treasury Department’s “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg wants that reduced.
———————-Why the headline?
Well, clearly, the problem is the $7,700 and $700 bonuses to the peons, and NOT the multi-million dollar bonuses to the “geniuses” who swap paper back and forth. Gee, you’d think you were taught that in school…
/sarcasm ;)[/quote]
got me on that one………
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.