Why is San Diego real estate still so expensive?

[jstoesz]

Just for fun I checked back in with my favorite (dream) neighborhood and things are looking up!

http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS_Updates-39-Point_Loma

a 3B 2B house in LA PLAYA! just went for 725k and there are 2 more good size homes listed for less than 650k! Is the SD market cracking? Is point loma coming down from the stratosphere?

Oh man I might becoming back to SD and forgoing Minneapolis after all!

All I need is another 20% drop, a fat couple raises in my career, and a unwilling (to move home to the land of 10,0000 lakes) wife, and SD here I come.

Lets hope there is more of this good news on the horizon. Everyone, ignore Pt. Loma. Carmel valley Rocks, look there please!

[bearishgurl]

[quote=paramount]Please define desirable.[/quote]

Highly desirable: “Quieter” communities =< than 5 miles from the coast or a bay which are not situated within a Community Facilities District or encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Coronado, Point Loma, PB, LJ, Del Mar, Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Malibu, Santa Barbara, Monterey, Santa Cruz, Saratoga, Palo Alto, Pacifica, Sausalito, Mendocino, Eureka. Desirable: "Quieter" communities =< than 10 miles from the coast or a bay or located in a mountain resort area which are not situated within a Community Facilities District and may be encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA or Covenant whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Rancho Palos Verdes, Fairbanks Ranch, Rancho Santa Fe, South Lake Tahoe, Mammoth Lakes. I favor SFR's over condos, even if encumbered by an HOA.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=paramount]Please define desirable.[/quote]

Highly desirable: “Quieter” communities =< than 5 miles from the coast or a bay which are not situated within a Community Facilities District or encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Coronado, Point Loma, PB, LJ, Del Mar, Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Malibu, Santa Barbara, Monterey, Santa Cruz, Saratoga, Palo Alto, Pacifica, Sausalito, Mendocino, Eureka. Desirable: "Quieter" communities =< than 10 miles from the coast or a bay or located in a mountain resort area which are not situated within a Community Facilities District and may be encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA or Covenant whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Rancho Palos Verdes, Fairbanks Ranch, Rancho Santa Fe, South Lake Tahoe, Mammoth Lakes. I favor SFR's over condos, even if encumbered by an HOA.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=paramount]Please define desirable.[/quote]

Highly desirable: “Quieter” communities =< than 5 miles from the coast or a bay which are not situated within a Community Facilities District or encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Coronado, Point Loma, PB, LJ, Del Mar, Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Malibu, Santa Barbara, Monterey, Santa Cruz, Saratoga, Palo Alto, Pacifica, Sausalito, Mendocino, Eureka. Desirable: "Quieter" communities =< than 10 miles from the coast or a bay or located in a mountain resort area which are not situated within a Community Facilities District and may be encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA or Covenant whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Rancho Palos Verdes, Fairbanks Ranch, Rancho Santa Fe, South Lake Tahoe, Mammoth Lakes. I favor SFR's over condos, even if encumbered by an HOA.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=paramount]Please define desirable.[/quote]

Highly desirable: “Quieter” communities =< than 5 miles from the coast or a bay which are not situated within a Community Facilities District or encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Coronado, Point Loma, PB, LJ, Del Mar, Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Malibu, Santa Barbara, Monterey, Santa Cruz, Saratoga, Palo Alto, Pacifica, Sausalito, Mendocino, Eureka. Desirable: "Quieter" communities =< than 10 miles from the coast or a bay or located in a mountain resort area which are not situated within a Community Facilities District and may be encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA or Covenant whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Rancho Palos Verdes, Fairbanks Ranch, Rancho Santa Fe, South Lake Tahoe, Mammoth Lakes. I favor SFR's over condos, even if encumbered by an HOA.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=paramount]Please define desirable.[/quote]

Highly desirable: “Quieter” communities =< than 5 miles from the coast or a bay which are not situated within a Community Facilities District or encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Coronado, Point Loma, PB, LJ, Del Mar, Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Malibu, Santa Barbara, Monterey, Santa Cruz, Saratoga, Palo Alto, Pacifica, Sausalito, Mendocino, Eureka. Desirable: "Quieter" communities =< than 10 miles from the coast or a bay or located in a mountain resort area which are not situated within a Community Facilities District and may be encumbered by an overly onerous and expensive HOA or Covenant whose CCR's greatly affect the individual rights of all owners who belong to it. Examples: Rancho Palos Verdes, Fairbanks Ranch, Rancho Santa Fe, South Lake Tahoe, Mammoth Lakes. I favor SFR's over condos, even if encumbered by an HOA.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]Lets hope there is more of this good news on the horizon. Everyone, ignore Pt. Loma. Carmel valley Rocks, look there please![/quote]

LOL! :=)

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]Lets hope there is more of this good news on the horizon. Everyone, ignore Pt. Loma. Carmel valley Rocks, look there please![/quote]

LOL! :=)

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]Lets hope there is more of this good news on the horizon. Everyone, ignore Pt. Loma. Carmel valley Rocks, look there please![/quote]

LOL! :=)

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]Lets hope there is more of this good news on the horizon. Everyone, ignore Pt. Loma. Carmel valley Rocks, look there please![/quote]

LOL! :=)

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]Lets hope there is more of this good news on the horizon. Everyone, ignore Pt. Loma. Carmel valley Rocks, look there please![/quote]

LOL! :=)

[sdrealtor]

Ummmmmm Del Mar and La Jolaa not encumbered by overly onerous rules that greatly affect the inidividuals rights? Tell that one to the design committees. RSF and Fairbanks not encumbered either? Ummm…exsqueeze me?

[sdrealtor]

Ummmmmm Del Mar and La Jolaa not encumbered by overly onerous rules that greatly affect the inidividuals rights? Tell that one to the design committees. RSF and Fairbanks not encumbered either? Ummm…exsqueeze me?

[sdrealtor]

Ummmmmm Del Mar and La Jolaa not encumbered by overly onerous rules that greatly affect the inidividuals rights? Tell that one to the design committees. RSF and Fairbanks not encumbered either? Ummm…exsqueeze me?

[sdrealtor]

Ummmmmm Del Mar and La Jolaa not encumbered by overly onerous rules that greatly affect the inidividuals rights? Tell that one to the design committees. RSF and Fairbanks not encumbered either? Ummm…exsqueeze me?

[Author]

Posts