- This topic has 360 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
drunkle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 5, 2008 at 8:35 PM #300323November 5, 2008 at 10:03 PM #299912
afx114
ParticipantAs soon as the rural areas stop calling us “unpatriotic” and “not part of real America” and “terrorist sympathizers” and “heathens” and “fags” and “Volvo drivers” and “latte sippers” and “wellfare moms” and “crack whores” then we will stop calling them “fly-over country.” Sound like a deal?
November 5, 2008 at 10:03 PM #300270afx114
ParticipantAs soon as the rural areas stop calling us “unpatriotic” and “not part of real America” and “terrorist sympathizers” and “heathens” and “fags” and “Volvo drivers” and “latte sippers” and “wellfare moms” and “crack whores” then we will stop calling them “fly-over country.” Sound like a deal?
November 5, 2008 at 10:03 PM #300281afx114
ParticipantAs soon as the rural areas stop calling us “unpatriotic” and “not part of real America” and “terrorist sympathizers” and “heathens” and “fags” and “Volvo drivers” and “latte sippers” and “wellfare moms” and “crack whores” then we will stop calling them “fly-over country.” Sound like a deal?
November 5, 2008 at 10:03 PM #300294afx114
ParticipantAs soon as the rural areas stop calling us “unpatriotic” and “not part of real America” and “terrorist sympathizers” and “heathens” and “fags” and “Volvo drivers” and “latte sippers” and “wellfare moms” and “crack whores” then we will stop calling them “fly-over country.” Sound like a deal?
November 5, 2008 at 10:03 PM #300343afx114
ParticipantAs soon as the rural areas stop calling us “unpatriotic” and “not part of real America” and “terrorist sympathizers” and “heathens” and “fags” and “Volvo drivers” and “latte sippers” and “wellfare moms” and “crack whores” then we will stop calling them “fly-over country.” Sound like a deal?
November 5, 2008 at 10:14 PM #299922DWCAP
Participant[quote=CONCHO])Some people actually feel that the Government cant fix all problems. I know that is foreign thought, because Obama is all knowing, all powerful, and all compasionate while still cool under pressure; but some people actually feel that the answer to many of the ills we face is best found in the people and not Washington.
“Yes, our greatness as a nation has depended on individual initiative, on a belief in the free market. But it has also depended on our sense of mutual regard for each other, of mutual responsibility. The idea that everybody has a stake in the country, that we’re all in it together and everybody’s got a shot at opportunity. Americans know this. We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to. But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.”
— Barack Obama
[/quote]But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.
Was this quote suppose to answer the objection that many people dont want Gov intervention? Cause I and many others have a feeling the first part you bolded was little more than political cover for the second part that I bolded. If it wasn’t, what is the reason for saying both? Why not just say, ” We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to, and I wont try to” ?
November 5, 2008 at 10:14 PM #300280DWCAP
Participant[quote=CONCHO])Some people actually feel that the Government cant fix all problems. I know that is foreign thought, because Obama is all knowing, all powerful, and all compasionate while still cool under pressure; but some people actually feel that the answer to many of the ills we face is best found in the people and not Washington.
“Yes, our greatness as a nation has depended on individual initiative, on a belief in the free market. But it has also depended on our sense of mutual regard for each other, of mutual responsibility. The idea that everybody has a stake in the country, that we’re all in it together and everybody’s got a shot at opportunity. Americans know this. We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to. But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.”
— Barack Obama
[/quote]But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.
Was this quote suppose to answer the objection that many people dont want Gov intervention? Cause I and many others have a feeling the first part you bolded was little more than political cover for the second part that I bolded. If it wasn’t, what is the reason for saying both? Why not just say, ” We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to, and I wont try to” ?
November 5, 2008 at 10:14 PM #300291DWCAP
Participant[quote=CONCHO])Some people actually feel that the Government cant fix all problems. I know that is foreign thought, because Obama is all knowing, all powerful, and all compasionate while still cool under pressure; but some people actually feel that the answer to many of the ills we face is best found in the people and not Washington.
“Yes, our greatness as a nation has depended on individual initiative, on a belief in the free market. But it has also depended on our sense of mutual regard for each other, of mutual responsibility. The idea that everybody has a stake in the country, that we’re all in it together and everybody’s got a shot at opportunity. Americans know this. We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to. But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.”
— Barack Obama
[/quote]But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.
Was this quote suppose to answer the objection that many people dont want Gov intervention? Cause I and many others have a feeling the first part you bolded was little more than political cover for the second part that I bolded. If it wasn’t, what is the reason for saying both? Why not just say, ” We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to, and I wont try to” ?
November 5, 2008 at 10:14 PM #300304DWCAP
Participant[quote=CONCHO])Some people actually feel that the Government cant fix all problems. I know that is foreign thought, because Obama is all knowing, all powerful, and all compasionate while still cool under pressure; but some people actually feel that the answer to many of the ills we face is best found in the people and not Washington.
“Yes, our greatness as a nation has depended on individual initiative, on a belief in the free market. But it has also depended on our sense of mutual regard for each other, of mutual responsibility. The idea that everybody has a stake in the country, that we’re all in it together and everybody’s got a shot at opportunity. Americans know this. We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to. But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.”
— Barack Obama
[/quote]But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.
Was this quote suppose to answer the objection that many people dont want Gov intervention? Cause I and many others have a feeling the first part you bolded was little more than political cover for the second part that I bolded. If it wasn’t, what is the reason for saying both? Why not just say, ” We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to, and I wont try to” ?
November 5, 2008 at 10:14 PM #300353DWCAP
Participant[quote=CONCHO])Some people actually feel that the Government cant fix all problems. I know that is foreign thought, because Obama is all knowing, all powerful, and all compasionate while still cool under pressure; but some people actually feel that the answer to many of the ills we face is best found in the people and not Washington.
“Yes, our greatness as a nation has depended on individual initiative, on a belief in the free market. But it has also depended on our sense of mutual regard for each other, of mutual responsibility. The idea that everybody has a stake in the country, that we’re all in it together and everybody’s got a shot at opportunity. Americans know this. We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to. But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.”
— Barack Obama
[/quote]But we also know that there are some things we can’t do on our own. We know that there are some things we do better together.
Was this quote suppose to answer the objection that many people dont want Gov intervention? Cause I and many others have a feeling the first part you bolded was little more than political cover for the second part that I bolded. If it wasn’t, what is the reason for saying both? Why not just say, ” We know that government can’t solve all our problems – and we don’t want it to, and I wont try to” ?
November 5, 2008 at 11:55 PM #299977ucodegen
ParticipantI found it interesting that Republicans show as higher incomes but Democrats show as higher education in the study
And what a horrible trait it is, to put something above money. What next, caring about the environment over money. Disgusting
Lovely.. now you have demonstrated that you know how to quote out of context.. followed by adding an inflammatory remark. ‘sweet’.. to coin someone…
Lets try the second part.. somethings up there because there is a strong correlation between education and income. Maybe more Republicans have started businesses... like the one that may employ you?
For instance the Republicans tend to appeal to rural voters. I’d would surmise largely on social issues. Its never really been able to deliver on those issues, and it probably never will.
Actually in a way, they have.. most rural voters want less government and government out of their lives. They want to be left alone. As for this current, soon to be past, administration; I don’t think they left the rural voters alone.. could be part of why the political shift?
.. as for the political costs associated with both parties moving to the extremes.. I agree. I am more of a centrist.
November 5, 2008 at 11:55 PM #300335ucodegen
ParticipantI found it interesting that Republicans show as higher incomes but Democrats show as higher education in the study
And what a horrible trait it is, to put something above money. What next, caring about the environment over money. Disgusting
Lovely.. now you have demonstrated that you know how to quote out of context.. followed by adding an inflammatory remark. ‘sweet’.. to coin someone…
Lets try the second part.. somethings up there because there is a strong correlation between education and income. Maybe more Republicans have started businesses... like the one that may employ you?
For instance the Republicans tend to appeal to rural voters. I’d would surmise largely on social issues. Its never really been able to deliver on those issues, and it probably never will.
Actually in a way, they have.. most rural voters want less government and government out of their lives. They want to be left alone. As for this current, soon to be past, administration; I don’t think they left the rural voters alone.. could be part of why the political shift?
.. as for the political costs associated with both parties moving to the extremes.. I agree. I am more of a centrist.
November 5, 2008 at 11:55 PM #300346ucodegen
ParticipantI found it interesting that Republicans show as higher incomes but Democrats show as higher education in the study
And what a horrible trait it is, to put something above money. What next, caring about the environment over money. Disgusting
Lovely.. now you have demonstrated that you know how to quote out of context.. followed by adding an inflammatory remark. ‘sweet’.. to coin someone…
Lets try the second part.. somethings up there because there is a strong correlation between education and income. Maybe more Republicans have started businesses... like the one that may employ you?
For instance the Republicans tend to appeal to rural voters. I’d would surmise largely on social issues. Its never really been able to deliver on those issues, and it probably never will.
Actually in a way, they have.. most rural voters want less government and government out of their lives. They want to be left alone. As for this current, soon to be past, administration; I don’t think they left the rural voters alone.. could be part of why the political shift?
.. as for the political costs associated with both parties moving to the extremes.. I agree. I am more of a centrist.
November 5, 2008 at 11:55 PM #300359ucodegen
ParticipantI found it interesting that Republicans show as higher incomes but Democrats show as higher education in the study
And what a horrible trait it is, to put something above money. What next, caring about the environment over money. Disgusting
Lovely.. now you have demonstrated that you know how to quote out of context.. followed by adding an inflammatory remark. ‘sweet’.. to coin someone…
Lets try the second part.. somethings up there because there is a strong correlation between education and income. Maybe more Republicans have started businesses... like the one that may employ you?
For instance the Republicans tend to appeal to rural voters. I’d would surmise largely on social issues. Its never really been able to deliver on those issues, and it probably never will.
Actually in a way, they have.. most rural voters want less government and government out of their lives. They want to be left alone. As for this current, soon to be past, administration; I don’t think they left the rural voters alone.. could be part of why the political shift?
.. as for the political costs associated with both parties moving to the extremes.. I agree. I am more of a centrist.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.