- This topic has 360 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
drunkle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2008 at 11:08 AM #302316November 9, 2008 at 10:33 PM #302048
socrattt
ParticipantCoop, that’s just it, they don’t!
Here is the problem. We are now going into a depression and our brilliant citizens have voted to help the problem by adding additional tax burdens not just to the rich, but also to the middle and low class. What a genius idea!
Americans really do puzzle me. The majority votes a President in strictly on inspiration without really thinking about the consequences. The uneducated have spoken and now we will all pay the price.
What little Americans have left will be taken by the government to make sure that the irresponsible are protected.
November 9, 2008 at 10:33 PM #302409ParticipantCoop, that’s just it, they don’t!
Here is the problem. We are now going into a depression and our brilliant citizens have voted to help the problem by adding additional tax burdens not just to the rich, but also to the middle and low class. What a genius idea!
Americans really do puzzle me. The majority votes a President in strictly on inspiration without really thinking about the consequences. The uneducated have spoken and now we will all pay the price.
What little Americans have left will be taken by the government to make sure that the irresponsible are protected.
November 9, 2008 at 10:33 PM #302417ParticipantCoop, that’s just it, they don’t!
Here is the problem. We are now going into a depression and our brilliant citizens have voted to help the problem by adding additional tax burdens not just to the rich, but also to the middle and low class. What a genius idea!
Americans really do puzzle me. The majority votes a President in strictly on inspiration without really thinking about the consequences. The uneducated have spoken and now we will all pay the price.
What little Americans have left will be taken by the government to make sure that the irresponsible are protected.
November 9, 2008 at 10:33 PM #302435ParticipantCoop, that’s just it, they don’t!
Here is the problem. We are now going into a depression and our brilliant citizens have voted to help the problem by adding additional tax burdens not just to the rich, but also to the middle and low class. What a genius idea!
Americans really do puzzle me. The majority votes a President in strictly on inspiration without really thinking about the consequences. The uneducated have spoken and now we will all pay the price.
What little Americans have left will be taken by the government to make sure that the irresponsible are protected.
November 9, 2008 at 10:33 PM #302491ParticipantCoop, that’s just it, they don’t!
Here is the problem. We are now going into a depression and our brilliant citizens have voted to help the problem by adding additional tax burdens not just to the rich, but also to the middle and low class. What a genius idea!
Americans really do puzzle me. The majority votes a President in strictly on inspiration without really thinking about the consequences. The uneducated have spoken and now we will all pay the price.
What little Americans have left will be taken by the government to make sure that the irresponsible are protected.
November 10, 2008 at 2:15 PM #302348anxvariety
ParticipantThey understand what America is about. Californians are inundated with the victim message on a daily basis.. so they vote to take care of everyone. They don’t understand that a country needs a set of cultural values that don’t change and the family unit is one of those. Liberals just don’t understand anything really except sitting around talking about nothing with their Starbucks.
November 10, 2008 at 2:15 PM #302709ParticipantThey understand what America is about. Californians are inundated with the victim message on a daily basis.. so they vote to take care of everyone. They don’t understand that a country needs a set of cultural values that don’t change and the family unit is one of those. Liberals just don’t understand anything really except sitting around talking about nothing with their Starbucks.
November 10, 2008 at 2:15 PM #302718ParticipantThey understand what America is about. Californians are inundated with the victim message on a daily basis.. so they vote to take care of everyone. They don’t understand that a country needs a set of cultural values that don’t change and the family unit is one of those. Liberals just don’t understand anything really except sitting around talking about nothing with their Starbucks.
November 10, 2008 at 2:15 PM #302736ParticipantThey understand what America is about. Californians are inundated with the victim message on a daily basis.. so they vote to take care of everyone. They don’t understand that a country needs a set of cultural values that don’t change and the family unit is one of those. Liberals just don’t understand anything really except sitting around talking about nothing with their Starbucks.
November 10, 2008 at 2:15 PM #302791ParticipantThey understand what America is about. Californians are inundated with the victim message on a daily basis.. so they vote to take care of everyone. They don’t understand that a country needs a set of cultural values that don’t change and the family unit is one of those. Liberals just don’t understand anything really except sitting around talking about nothing with their Starbucks.
November 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM #302388drunkle
Participantthe prevailing motivation behind republican stalwarts appears to be superficiality. whether rich, poor or middle class, the superficial agendas of “being conservative”, of hating “liberals” and of being wealthy and/or attractive reign supreme.
fly-over republicans can subscribe to such an ideology simply because they don’t care or have concerns about the economy and business practices (they’re poor…), they don’t care about global issues because the world is the street they live on, and they don’t care about social well being simply because they don’t care about the other guy. as long as their team, be it political, athletic, religious, alcoholic or sexual wins, that’s all that matters. they could be benchwarmers for team heterosexual, water boys for team christ or season ticket holders for team budweiser; as long as they’re cheering for the winning team, that makes them winners too.
to be fair, democrat stalwarts are ugly. so republicans are justifiably angry; the democrats pollute their aesthetic sensibilities. ugly democrats also tend to pursue higher education since they don’t ride their family’s fortunes or their looks.
suffice to say that i don’t believe either team ideologies are of value. republicans should not only look deeper into the issues of the day, they should also look inward and examine the hypocritical ideals they hold. and democrats should stop being ugly. maybe then, dems and reps could find enough common ground to come together and throw off the yoke of party politics.
November 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM #302749Participantthe prevailing motivation behind republican stalwarts appears to be superficiality. whether rich, poor or middle class, the superficial agendas of “being conservative”, of hating “liberals” and of being wealthy and/or attractive reign supreme.
fly-over republicans can subscribe to such an ideology simply because they don’t care or have concerns about the economy and business practices (they’re poor…), they don’t care about global issues because the world is the street they live on, and they don’t care about social well being simply because they don’t care about the other guy. as long as their team, be it political, athletic, religious, alcoholic or sexual wins, that’s all that matters. they could be benchwarmers for team heterosexual, water boys for team christ or season ticket holders for team budweiser; as long as they’re cheering for the winning team, that makes them winners too.
to be fair, democrat stalwarts are ugly. so republicans are justifiably angry; the democrats pollute their aesthetic sensibilities. ugly democrats also tend to pursue higher education since they don’t ride their family’s fortunes or their looks.
suffice to say that i don’t believe either team ideologies are of value. republicans should not only look deeper into the issues of the day, they should also look inward and examine the hypocritical ideals they hold. and democrats should stop being ugly. maybe then, dems and reps could find enough common ground to come together and throw off the yoke of party politics.
November 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM #302758Participantthe prevailing motivation behind republican stalwarts appears to be superficiality. whether rich, poor or middle class, the superficial agendas of “being conservative”, of hating “liberals” and of being wealthy and/or attractive reign supreme.
fly-over republicans can subscribe to such an ideology simply because they don’t care or have concerns about the economy and business practices (they’re poor…), they don’t care about global issues because the world is the street they live on, and they don’t care about social well being simply because they don’t care about the other guy. as long as their team, be it political, athletic, religious, alcoholic or sexual wins, that’s all that matters. they could be benchwarmers for team heterosexual, water boys for team christ or season ticket holders for team budweiser; as long as they’re cheering for the winning team, that makes them winners too.
to be fair, democrat stalwarts are ugly. so republicans are justifiably angry; the democrats pollute their aesthetic sensibilities. ugly democrats also tend to pursue higher education since they don’t ride their family’s fortunes or their looks.
suffice to say that i don’t believe either team ideologies are of value. republicans should not only look deeper into the issues of the day, they should also look inward and examine the hypocritical ideals they hold. and democrats should stop being ugly. maybe then, dems and reps could find enough common ground to come together and throw off the yoke of party politics.
November 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM #302777Participantthe prevailing motivation behind republican stalwarts appears to be superficiality. whether rich, poor or middle class, the superficial agendas of “being conservative”, of hating “liberals” and of being wealthy and/or attractive reign supreme.
fly-over republicans can subscribe to such an ideology simply because they don’t care or have concerns about the economy and business practices (they’re poor…), they don’t care about global issues because the world is the street they live on, and they don’t care about social well being simply because they don’t care about the other guy. as long as their team, be it political, athletic, religious, alcoholic or sexual wins, that’s all that matters. they could be benchwarmers for team heterosexual, water boys for team christ or season ticket holders for team budweiser; as long as they’re cheering for the winning team, that makes them winners too.
to be fair, democrat stalwarts are ugly. so republicans are justifiably angry; the democrats pollute their aesthetic sensibilities. ugly democrats also tend to pursue higher education since they don’t ride their family’s fortunes or their looks.
suffice to say that i don’t believe either team ideologies are of value. republicans should not only look deeper into the issues of the day, they should also look inward and examine the hypocritical ideals they hold. and democrats should stop being ugly. maybe then, dems and reps could find enough common ground to come together and throw off the yoke of party politics.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.