Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Why California Is Doomed
- This topic has 205 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 10, 2010 at 6:09 AM #524737March 10, 2010 at 6:59 AM #523811
scaredyclassic
Participanti’d say the value of money might be less important going forward than people’s sense of confidence that they can continue to earn some of it. in addiiton to measuring “consumer confidence”, why don’t they measure ior rename it “earning confidence”? it assumes that earner’s will all be consuming.
March 10, 2010 at 6:59 AM #523948Participanti’d say the value of money might be less important going forward than people’s sense of confidence that they can continue to earn some of it. in addiiton to measuring “consumer confidence”, why don’t they measure ior rename it “earning confidence”? it assumes that earner’s will all be consuming.
March 10, 2010 at 6:59 AM #524389Participanti’d say the value of money might be less important going forward than people’s sense of confidence that they can continue to earn some of it. in addiiton to measuring “consumer confidence”, why don’t they measure ior rename it “earning confidence”? it assumes that earner’s will all be consuming.
March 10, 2010 at 6:59 AM #524485Participanti’d say the value of money might be less important going forward than people’s sense of confidence that they can continue to earn some of it. in addiiton to measuring “consumer confidence”, why don’t they measure ior rename it “earning confidence”? it assumes that earner’s will all be consuming.
March 10, 2010 at 6:59 AM #524742Participanti’d say the value of money might be less important going forward than people’s sense of confidence that they can continue to earn some of it. in addiiton to measuring “consumer confidence”, why don’t they measure ior rename it “earning confidence”? it assumes that earner’s will all be consuming.
March 10, 2010 at 9:21 AM #523841Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantWhile I don’t necessarily believe this, I thought it was a great line.
“San Diego would be a great place to live if it wasn’t surrounded by California.”
The Doom and Gloom will ease someday (hopefully soon) but in the mean time try to save some of these great one liners, they do provide some comic relief.
March 10, 2010 at 9:21 AM #523978ParticipantWhile I don’t necessarily believe this, I thought it was a great line.
“San Diego would be a great place to live if it wasn’t surrounded by California.”
The Doom and Gloom will ease someday (hopefully soon) but in the mean time try to save some of these great one liners, they do provide some comic relief.
March 10, 2010 at 9:21 AM #524419ParticipantWhile I don’t necessarily believe this, I thought it was a great line.
“San Diego would be a great place to live if it wasn’t surrounded by California.”
The Doom and Gloom will ease someday (hopefully soon) but in the mean time try to save some of these great one liners, they do provide some comic relief.
March 10, 2010 at 9:21 AM #524515ParticipantWhile I don’t necessarily believe this, I thought it was a great line.
“San Diego would be a great place to live if it wasn’t surrounded by California.”
The Doom and Gloom will ease someday (hopefully soon) but in the mean time try to save some of these great one liners, they do provide some comic relief.
March 10, 2010 at 9:21 AM #524773ParticipantWhile I don’t necessarily believe this, I thought it was a great line.
“San Diego would be a great place to live if it wasn’t surrounded by California.”
The Doom and Gloom will ease someday (hopefully soon) but in the mean time try to save some of these great one liners, they do provide some comic relief.
March 10, 2010 at 9:35 AM #523866desmond
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Denial is thinking your going to get that Ocean View McMansion for less than 400K (call me the king of Da Nile), but never having plan B, maybe move a little further inland ???
Just a thought…[/quote]
The “Straw Man” argument, it is getting worse!
March 10, 2010 at 9:35 AM #524003Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Denial is thinking your going to get that Ocean View McMansion for less than 400K (call me the king of Da Nile), but never having plan B, maybe move a little further inland ???
Just a thought…[/quote]
The “Straw Man” argument, it is getting worse!
March 10, 2010 at 9:35 AM #524444Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Denial is thinking your going to get that Ocean View McMansion for less than 400K (call me the king of Da Nile), but never having plan B, maybe move a little further inland ???
Just a thought…[/quote]
The “Straw Man” argument, it is getting worse!
March 10, 2010 at 9:35 AM #524540Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Denial is thinking your going to get that Ocean View McMansion for less than 400K (call me the king of Da Nile), but never having plan B, maybe move a little further inland ???
Just a thought…[/quote]
The “Straw Man” argument, it is getting worse!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.